Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,913 comments
  • 3,239,862 views
Facepalm.jpg
 
Those bro-trucks are exactly what 75% of my town drives, I'm just sick and tired of seeing useless F-150's and Rams, and poorly done Ranger's, Tacoma's, and S10's.

I'm not kidding when I say everything is lifted... have to go find a pic of that lifted PT Cruiser again.. and snap a pic of the lifted ford van.. which is a shuttle here.
 
If it didn't have nearly as many flames, it would be awesome.



Or they just used them until they could get the funds for real doors.

It's been explained to you what it's for and you even said off-roading is not your thing. So why comment and an actual off-road purpose design, that you know nothing about. IF you don't like the look leave it at that and move on but don't argue it as if it's stupid and has no purpose, when it does.
 
It's been explained to you what it's for and you even said off-roading is not your thing. So why comment and an actual off-road purpose design, that you know nothing about. IF you don't like the look leave it at that and move on but don't argue it as if it's stupid and has no purpose, when it does.

I was just giving my opinion on how I thought it looked. I didn't say it was useless, I just thought it looked odd.
 
I was just giving my opinion on how I thought it looked. I didn't say it was useless, I just thought it looked odd.

Yes but as I said that's fine but when you keep arguing it after it's then becomes a bit superfluous. Especially since it has a function to it's design which isn't questionable, this has been discussed in the thread before, functional items that are actually working designs and fabrication aren't questionable and shouldn't be posted here.
 
Wait, the one that appears to actually be a well-built, legit off-roader is the questionable one?
I hate vehicles without doors.
Why? They are awesome. Especially a off-roader.
Because it looks like someone didn't have enough money to finish their project.
It's easier to get in and out of the car, that's for sure. Especially in countries where they park inches away from your car.
Ok. I would assume not a lot of jeeps drive with the doors off in your neck of the woods. Its good to see obstacles etc when off roading.
I guess. Off roading just isn't really my thing.
LOL, no...They took the "real" doors off their Explorer and put those on, because they are awesome for rock-crawling. Saves a lot of weight, huge improvement in visiblity, safer than no doors.
It's been explained to you what it's for and you even said off-roading is not your thing. So why comment and an actual off-road purpose design, that you know nothing about. IF you don't like the look leave it at that and move on but don't argue it as if it's stupid and has no purpose, when it does.
I was just giving my opinion on how I thought it looked. I didn't say it was useless, I just thought it looked odd.
Yes but as I said that's fine but when you keep arguing it after it's then becomes a bit superfluous. Especially since it has a function to it's design which isn't questionable, this has been discussed in the thread before, functional items that are actually working designs and fabrication aren't questionable and shouldn't be posted here.
Guys, it's a Photoshop....:lol:
 

Latest Posts

Back