rate a car!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Codename 47
  • 230 comments
  • 13,909 views
15%
And oh boy what a slugger!!!!!!!!!!!

Next Car:
Mazda 787B
 
53%
Bland car to drive, bland car to race.

Next Car:
Acura RSX Type-S
 
Originally posted by The Vanishing Boy Next Car:
Acura RSX Type-S
Click to expand...
60%. Too heavy and too underpowered compared to the Integra it replaced. Worse understeer problem to tune out. Bland car to drive, bland car to race. Looks better than the Beetle, though.

Next up: Clio Sport or Clio racecar.
 
70% i didn't enjoy these as much as i thought. it had too much understeer (maybe its just the way i drive?) and it never really was able to hold the ground.

O.K., how about Nissan Z concept
 
70

It just seems like it should be a little more powerful, but other than that, it handles well. I just don't like gold cars...



Next car: Audi S4
 
6.5/10

It doesn't look very GT-ish and doesn't quite fit in amongst the equallly powered japanese cars. (i.e. Skyline, Lancer, RX-7)

The engine is great only the chassis seems as if it can't handle it quite well when tuned hard.

Next car: Mine's Lancer Evo VI
 
60%

Not enough power, handles ok, but not really a contender in most races...

Next car:RUF 3400S
 
when you get it up to 631 hp and fully upgraded IT FLIES!!!!!! great handling, fast, very stable and easy to drive, THE car for the pro spider roadster cup, 85%
 
7.4/10

Great 3th, 4th and 5th gear but only a bit slow coming out of corners in 2nd. Handles nice, quick if not sometimes a bit sluggish.

Mazda MX-5 1.8i (LS)
 
Slow, not enough Horsepower, Accerleration is bad

Good for drifters, Not a bad car once tuned up, Roadster.

Overall 57%


Next car:
Honda Civic Type R
 
Fast, Good HP when modded and Stock, Great Acceleration, Sounds Cool. Doesn't handle real well. 90%

Next Car
Subbie WRX
 
WRX: 80%. Quick and fast, but feels heavy. Benefits greatly from weight reduction Likes to be sideways but loses a lot of speed when drifted too much; requires early braking. Gets extra points for being available as a station wagon because it's cool to watch on replays.

Next victim: Camaro SS.
 
75%-good power, handling is avarage...can become a handful to drive.

Next car: Mitsubishi 3000GT
 
99%...reminds me of my good ol' days in GT1 driving my maxed out GTO twinturbo :)

Next Car
Honda S2000
 
95%-great car, exellent power, exellent handling, could use more torque though. Very fun to drive and race.
 
90% Not too good in the game...but I'm giving it credit since my dad owns this car and it's a ton of fun to drive
 
85%-really fast, handles ok, but it seems to drive weird at times...

Next car:Tommy K ZZ-s
 
80% Only driven it a few times, I'll give it 80 because the ZZII(j) is rad :)

Next Car: Panoz Esperante
 
What can I say about this good for nothing car? Not much really it just plain sucks!! Yup. I give it :sleep: I give it a sleepy 35/100.

Next we have the: Vertigo Race car?
 
65%-sure it drives ok and stuff, but it's just something I don't race with...

next car...Celica GT-4
 
50% at best. I just don't like this car. Too heavy, doesn't handle terribly well, and the hamster driving that "Kompressor" must need a vacation. For a supposedly supercharged car, I had to go Stage II turbo to get anything out of it.

I eventually tuned it up enough to beat the CLKs, but it wasn't cheap, which was my original intention. Having taken care of the Beginner and Amateur Silver Arrows, I parked this car and have very little desire to ever drive it again.

Next up: NSX Type S Zero
 

Latest Posts

Back