"Rice"

  • Thread starter JohnBM01
  • 94 comments
  • 4,373 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
I saw some major rice in SF a couple of days ago:

(Sorry for the quality I had to resize...)
 

Attachments

  • rice.jpg
    rice.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 77
:lol: I love the way these ricers think they are something specail and they go out for "team" crusies. Thats funny.
 
Hell I eat rice and this rice crap makes me look bad(j/k)...
I think the problem is, is that people who usually love overdone exteriors are kids... Sheesh... I remember, I used to love some of my Hotwheels because they 'looked' like they could beat the other hotwheels... But they don't have any power do they? You gotta push them to make them go foward.. These (grown-up)kids think a car is fast if they make it look fast or something... I don't mind people who want to make the car into something that looks cool and has nice features in them, but there are too many young people that are getting the wrong idea in what is fast... LOOKING FAST does not equal FAST!! And the sad thing is they usually use the term 'rice'.
 
If the wing is taller than the car, it's rice

If the tach is bigger than the rims, it's rice

I think no street car should have one of those big wings. Only track cars. It just looks stupid.
 
I think its fine to just have looks on your car, thats fine by me, but don't lie. If your car is not fast then it is not fast. Hell is my truck fast, not really...but does it look good? I think so.
 
Those rice cars in SF pictured are nothing. I just saw a Civic with what I can only describe as a 'square' bodykit... not very aerodynamic or appealing to the eye. I never thought I would see something nearly as boxy or ugly as a Scion xB, but that Civic came really close...
 
Originally posted by Dorifto
I saw some major rice in SF a couple of days ago:

(Sorry for the quality I had to resize...)

How are you going to call it rice if you don't know what's under the hood, to me its rice if they mis badge it, or make look extremely fast but its not, but show cars a different story
 
Originally posted by knightinwhite86
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT'S UNDER THE HOOD, DUDE

Actually, I don't care what's under the hood. It could be the 6-liter V12 from the Lamborghini Diablo and it'd still be rice. Bodykits, wings, and wheels like that equate to rice no matter what's under the hood.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
Actually, I don't care what's under the hood. It could be the 6-liter V12 from the Lamborghini Diablo and it'd still be rice. Bodykits, wings, and wheels like that equate to rice no matter what's under the hood.
I agree. Even if there is power to back it up, it's still tacky. And if there isn't power, it's unforgivably tacky.
 
Originally posted by neon_duke
I agree. Even if there is power to back it up, it's still tacky. And if there isn't power, it's unforgivably tacky.

Yeah, he's right. They are all tacky whether they are fast or not.
 
Originally posted by 87chevy
Yeah, he's right. They are all tacky whether they are fast or not.

I'm also inclined to agree. Its like the automotive equivalant of wearing a Speedo. Even if you're have a BSD, who the hell wants to see it?


M
 
So... is a Plymouth Superbird "rice" then? I mean, it's essentially a standard muscle car with a new front bumper on (see Veilside - although the Plymouth's is specifically to aid aeridynamic efficiency) and a massively huge rear wing (made taller out of need to open the boot (trunk)...). Doesn't matter what's under the bonnet then?
 
WOAH there!!!! A Superbird IS NOT RICE! That is a classic muscle car! The car came like that from the factory. And, like you said, the new front addon was for actual areodynamic purposes! And the rear wing was probably too. After all, NASCAR raced them just like that.


ps. Also, I don't think anything with a V8 can be classified as Rice. Now i'm not talking about "what if i put a V8 in a civic?", first of all that would be an insult to the engine. If it's got over 289 cubes, and 8 cylinders, it's not rice.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
Actually, I don't care what's under the hood. It could be the 6-liter V12 from the Lamborghini Diablo and it'd still be rice. Bodykits, wings, and wheels like that equate to rice no matter what's under the hood.

Superbird - bodykit? Check! Wing? Check! What's under the hood? Doesn't matter...
 
Famine makes a good point.

But the word was tacky, not rice. The Superbird was a homologation special. All that stuff WORKED. It looked ridiculous, especially on a street car, but it was functional.

I dunno. Asthetics are tough thing to nail down. Fully functional wings are okay, but when you're off the track and just tooling down to the grocery store, its all a bit too much. This would go for an Evo or a GT2.


M
 
And all the same things could apply to a Veilside or Top Secret Supra - and they look bloody vile. But the stuff all works.

Just so everyone knows, I love the Superbird. I also love the Supra TT (err, original, not smegged up).
 
Oh, and I have to be competely fair here, 87Chevy. A 4" lift on a big azz truck is way tacky too. ;) But what do I know? I like deem yankee cars.


M
 
As is a Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI - and that looks like it crashed into Halfords and all the parts stuck onto it...
 
Originally posted by ///M-Spec
Oh, and I have to be competely fair here, 87Chevy. A 4" lift on a big azz truck is way tacky too. ;) But what do I know? I like deem yankee cars.


M

Whoa, there big guy, uh, no it's not. What's tacky is a 3inch BODY LIFT on a truck, and cheap a** all-terrains and cheapo dual exhaust that has one pipe hanging down because the mounts rusted out or broke. What looks good is what i have. I have a truck that is functional and that i actually use to go off road. My truck is far more cabable than most the trucks around here because they have stock, dinky, drivetrain with big tires, no lockers (ie. one wheel wonders) and crappy looking body lifts. And bad sounding exhuast.

see you done gone and opened up a whole big can o'worms that didn't need to be opened.

and to answer your question, you don't know nuthin'. ;)
 
Ok, I have trouble responding to that. It's just so damn stupid.

1. never said he had a BODY lift.
2. never said he even had a new exaust
3. never said he had "all terrains"
4. never said he took it off road

Chill out.
 
Originally posted by Famine
Plymouth Superbird. Next.
Hey, do not dis the Superbird! :irked:Even if it was the weak-sauce variant of the 'Winged Wonders,' the wing stood there for a purpose: to keep the car on the ground. (how ironic.) And the blasted thing was not put in place by some teen thinkin' he's the shat. I am not getting any deeper into the whole 'Rice tuner' deal, for it has been beaten to a pulp already.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back