Rolls-Royce Confirms the Cullinan, But Don't Call it an SUV...

Discussion in 'Auto News' started by GTPNewsWire, Feb 13, 2018.

  1. GTPNewsWire

    GTPNewsWire Contributing Writer

    Messages:
    5,478
    Location:
    United States
    eran0004 likes this.
  2. Man of Wheel

    Man of Wheel

    Messages:
    50
    It's an SUV.
     
    TheNuvolari likes this.
  3. Robin

    Robin Premium

    Messages:
    15,455
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Surprised they didn't call it a country house :lol:
     
  4. Crazybutt198

    Crazybutt198

    Messages:
    245
    Location:
    England
    Call it a massive taxi then
     
  5. MatskiMonk

    MatskiMonk Premium

    Messages:
    8,906
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    I think the sooner the term SUV is done away with, or at least gets a clearer definition, the better.
     
  6. Downhill Dino

    Downhill Dino Premium

    Messages:
    10,831
    Location:
    United States
    Wait, what's wrong with the classification? It does kinda have a wide net if that's the problem.
     
  7. JacksHerer

    JacksHerer

    Messages:
    1,219
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    sports utility vehicle?
    yeh I recall seeing all these SUVs being used to get the sport equipment to the sport location

    Chelsea tractor is the best name I've heard for them.

    Damn ugly is the name I would use.
     
  8. SlipZtrEm

    SlipZtrEm Administrator

    Messages:
    24,453
    Location:
    Canada
    A high bodied vehicle for high bodied people.

    upload_2018-2-13_10-59-16.png
     
  9. EngieDiesel

    EngieDiesel

    Messages:
    512
    Location:
    United States
    I could see it happening. After all, Mercedes was okay with this:
    [​IMG]

    That said, I can't say I'm surprised that Rolls-Royce would consider the term "sport utility vehicle" too pedestrian for it's clientele. Maybe it's so they can add an "exclusive vehicle designation" fee in the standard options package. :dopey:
     
  10. eran0004

    eran0004

    Messages:
    7,904
    Location:
    Sweden
    IMG_0989.JPG

    It's actually quite impressive in person. Nice proportions. If I owned a castle in the countryside I'd buy one :p
     
  11. Carbon_6

    Carbon_6

    Messages:
    675
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    High Bodied Vehicle...

    Good luck selling that as an acronym.
     
  12. Robin

    Robin Premium

    Messages:
    15,455
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Yup, it's usually followed by the words... 'tipped over'.
     
  13. GOTMAXPOWER

    GOTMAXPOWER

    Messages:
    4,007
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    It looks like a black cab.
     
  14. MatskiMonk

    MatskiMonk Premium

    Messages:
    8,906
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    The phrase 'sports utility vehicle' is in itself a statement of purpose, it indicates what the intended use of the vehicle would be, rather than being a description of it's bodystyle*. Rolls-Royce probably don't feel this accurately reflects the likely usage of the Cullinan by its owners.

    *This is why I personally don't like it as a vehicle classification. I know that's how it's used, but I'd prefer terms that were more descriptive of bodyshape, than intended use. The origins of a term like 'Sedan' don't really matter because they pre-date the automobile, but I don't think modern terms like SUV are accurate... personally.. High Riding Vehicle would seem simply to make more sense, though Honda kind of buggered that up - so I don't think High Bodied Vehicle would be that bad, personally.
     
  15. Famine

    Famine Administrator

    Messages:
    60,358
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    HBV sounds like a virus.
     
    Carbon_6, Turbo and TexRex like this.
  16. Lameonade

    Lameonade

    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    United States
    Well, Pontiac tried to call the Aztek an SRV (Sport Recreational Vehicle), but everyone I've talked to calls it a 'truck' or 'van'. I'm sure the general populous will still call this an SUV, even if it's not used for utilitarian purposes.
     
  17. TexRex

    TexRex

    Messages:
    7,167
    Location:
    United States
    Human bappleomavirus--contracted by partaking of reefer through an apple.
     
  18. MatskiMonk

    MatskiMonk Premium

    Messages:
    8,906
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Hepatitis B Virus might be the more obvious one. Having said that... I did have to google that to know, and Human xyz Virus is quite common. Doesn't seem to be a problem for HGV's though.

    ... which would be a problem for about a day (or for as long as car journo's thought they could get a like, share or subscribe from it) if such a term was actually adopted somewhat formally as a vehicle classification.
     
  19. Famine

    Famine Administrator

    Messages:
    60,358
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Fun fact: Rolls-Royce initially referred to it as a High Sided Vehicle. That lasted 20 minutes or so, because car journos after a like, share or subscribe started posting pictures like these on social media:

    [​IMG]
     
    VXR and JacksHerer like this.
  20. MatskiMonk

    MatskiMonk Premium

    Messages:
    8,906
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Damned journos using social media to highlight the shortcomings of using non-defined names in implied legal situations to limit access to the less attractive side of the country!
     
    EDK likes this.
  21. Famine

    Famine Administrator

    Messages:
    60,358
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    I think it was more "lol, it's a lorry".
     
    VXR likes this.