Scaff's Sim Racing Reviews

[Scaff]

I've been reviewing titles on my youtube channel for a while now (link in my signature), however following a discussion over in the Project Cars 3 sub-forum I've put a more structured approach in place, and thought I would gather them all in a central location.

The following video explains why I've taken this route and how the scores/ranking is made up, however, I've also covered these in text for those who don't want to listen to me.



Review Policy
A Note on Scores
These are my own view based on my own experience with the titles in question and should be taken as just that, you may well disagree in some or even all of the areas and that's perfectly understandable, these scores are also representative of how a title stands at the point in time it's being reviewed.

A Note on a 'Total' Ranking
I don’t intend to provide a total score or ranking as the actual needs of someone looking to pick up a title will vary, for example, if a large amount of accuracy to a particular Motorsport discipline simply isn't high for you, the score it that area is largely irrelevant. What I would suggest is that you take the areas that are important to you, and use those to get your own final score for a title.


Scoring Areas
Driving Simulation
Dominated by the physics side of how vehicle dynamics and tyre models are recreated. It would also include the implementation of Force Feedback to communicate what is happening within the physics engine and Tyre model, as well as how well track and surface changes are dealt with.

Racing Simulation
Rating the quality and awareness of the AI, as well as how balanced it is across the various types of vehicles being raced. How varied the packs' ability is and how scalable it is for users.

Motorsport Simulation
This one is a made up of how well real-world motorsport disciplines are recreated, it can be very focused (such as the F1 series, WRC series or ACC) or more of a sandpit (such as PC). Are the correct vehicles, tracks/stages and regulations being used.

Accessibility
How varying needs are catered for in terms of the audience, are a good number of well implemented driver aids included is the title game-pad friendly, does the difficult scale well and (if applicable) are the structures and rules of the racing explained well.

Content
Simply how much 'stuff' does it have in it, the range of tracks and vehicles. Is it a singular focus or does it take the sandpit approach? How widely can the content be used, i.e. can you take any car up Pikes Peak (as in SLRE) or is it locked to only some of the content (as in Dirt Rally)

Value
What is the initial price, does it come with a season pass from day one, how much of the future DLC is chargeable and is it recharging content that has been recycled from previous titles.

These six areas will then be plotted on a radar graph to provide a visual representation, along with a brief explanation of the score for each are and my logic behind it.

Review Stages
Initial Look
Done a day or two after launch, this will cover the initial impressions of a title and will not look to rank any of the above, as its too early and is used for getting an initial feel and view of a title. I try and do this for all of the main or interesting titles I can manage, but as I have to fund these myself, I can't cover everything

Review
Normally a week to ten days after launch to give time for the scale and scope of the title to be experienced (I do after all have a day job and family), this will use the ranking scale to provide a more balanced view of the title. Depending on the title, this may be the first review if I wasn't able to pick the title up at launch.

DLC/Update Reviews
I will provide short reviews on Updates and DLC for as many titles as I can, for minor updates I will put these in a weekly roundup on the channel rather than dedicate a full video to minor changes.

Post DLC Review
A re-review of a title once the DLC (if applicable) and all updates are in, as in this day and age titles can change quite considerably over the first six months to a year.

The second post in the thread will be an Index, so that you can find related videos throughout the review stages easily, I will also be adding my old videos and adding in scores and explanations over time.

I hope you all find this interesting, but at the very least it helps provide me with a location to keep them all organised.

 

[Scaff]

Index (A to Z)

Art of Rally
Initial Look
Full Review

Assetto Corsa Competizione
Initial Look
Review

Circuit Superstars
Initial Look

Dakar Desert Rally
Initial Look

Dirt 5
Initial Look
Full Review
The Serious Review

Dirt Rally 2.0
Initial Look
One Year On

Drive Rally
First Look (Demo)

EA Sport WRC
Full Review

F1 2020
Initial Look
Review

F1 22
Initial Look

Forza Horizon 5
First Look
Review

Gran Turismo 7
First Look
Full Review

GRID Legends
Initial Review
Review

Hot Wheels Unleashed
Initial Look

Inertial Drift
Review

KartKraft
Initial Look
Review

Le Mans Ultimate
Early Access Quick Review

NASCAR Ignition
Initial Look

Offroad Mania
Quick Review

Overpass
Review

Project Cars 2
One Year On

Project Cars 3
Initial Look
Full Review

Race League
First Look (Early Access)

Redout 2
First Look

Ride 4
Initial Look

Rush Rally Origins
Full Review

Sebastien Loeb Rally Evo
Five Years on

Star Drift Evolution
Quick Review

Superstar Racing Experience: The Game
Initial Look

Ultimate Racing 2D
Review

WRC 8
Review

WRC 9
Initial Look
Full Review

WRC 10
Initial Look
Full Review

Wreckfest
Review
(Nearly) One Year On


Full Video Review Playlist

 

[Scaff]

F1 2020

Initial Look


Review

Driving Simulation: 7
Continues to build on previous years resulting in a good balance f approachable realism in regard to the driving simulation

Racing Simulation: 8
Solid AI with a good track awareness and happy to fight with both the player and each other, adding in a great range of skill levels

Motorsport Simulation: 9
About as close to offering every element of the sport as it possible to get and remain an accessible package

Accessibility: 8
Excellent range of accessibility options, catering for a wide range of players experience, the only thing it requires of the player is to bring a love and degree of knowledge of F1

Content: 5
Mainly limited to the current F1 field, last years F2 and a range of F1 classics, some of which are locked behind paid DLC or the premium launch edition

Value: 6
Unfortunate follows the Codemasters mould of locking some content away behind premium launch editions and paid DLC, offering perks like early access to those wishing to pay more. Combined with the (understandably) limited content due to the nature of the title potentially limits the value it offers to those not invested in F1 as a sport or series.

Full F1 2020 Video Playlist

 

[Scaff]

Assetto Corsa Competizione

Initial Look


Review

Driving Simulation: 9
Excellent physics and tyre model, taking a step above even the level of AC itself when combined with the dynamic weather and time of day makes for the most accurate and realistic driving simulation on console to date.

Racing Simulation: 8
Impressive AI with great awareness of both the player and each other, they will race accurately with each other. Oddly one of the most impressive aspects is the awareness of them to blue-flags when passing backmarkers, an area that is often forgotten in AI logic. Only let down by the lower AI count of console, which can make longer races lonely places at times.

Motorsport Simulation: 9
Unremittingly accurate in its depiction of the series, down to the actual track and weather differences between each of the two seasons offered, only let down by the unrealistically short stints in the longer events when scaled back to 'shorter' durations.

Accessibility: 4
Unfortunately, a title that does little to make the sport accessible, despite a short 'tutorial' in the career mode, large amounts of the particulars of the discipline are not explained and if you don't know things such as pit limiters only activating in 1st gear you are potentially going to end up feeling overwhelmed. Pad control is better than the original AC, but that's a low benchmark to beat.

Content: 5
With 24 cars and 11 tracks in the base title, even the 'free for pre-orders' Intercontinental GT pack, which adds 4 more tracks does little to change the fact that the title os light on content.

Value: 8
While low on content due to the nature of the discipline its recreating, the title pushes the score up by being a 'budget' price release, coming in at £35.

Full Assetto Corsa Competizione Video Playlist

 

[Scaff]

Ultimate Racing 2D

Review

Driving Simulation: 1
It's not a driving simulation, and aside from some type of vehicle being more tail-happy than others, you will not find a deep and detailed simulation model here. That said, did you really expect to?

Racing Simulation: 5
The AI is offered in a range of difficulties via a slider, meaning it does cater for a range of players, its functional enough to make mistakes and be aware of each other and the player

Motorsport Simulation: 4
Surprisingly it does offer qualifying, tyre wear, dynamic weather and pitstops, they may be done in a basic manner due to the arcade nature of the title, but this does add to the depth and replayability.

Accessibility: 9
It’s a top-down racer with a wide range of AI settings, it's about as accessible as it gets in this regard, plays great with a gamepad, has no idea what a wheel is!

Content: 8
35 racing classes, 45 tracks (many faux real-world ones), a massive career and championship mode provides a huge amount of content to get to grips with.

Value: 10
At under £8 it represents excellent value, particularly given the sheer amount of content it offers even as a top-down racing title

 

[Whitestar]

A Note on a 'Total' Ranking
I don’t intend to provide a total score or ranking as the actual needs of someone looking to pick up a title will vary, for example, if a large amount of accuracy to a particular Motorsport discipline simply isn't high for you, the score it that area is largely irrelevant.

Good decision! And I like that scoring system.

 

[Scaff]

Good decision! And I like that scoring system.

Thanks

 

[Morbid65]

I like the scoring system, particularly how the sim aspects are broken up into more specific categories.

I agree that an overall rating doesn't make a lot of sense, but as the number of titles you review grows, you could probably compile the ratings in a spread sheet that could be easily sorted for people to sort by the category they find most important and so on for those looking for a list.

 

[Scaff]

Dirt Rally 2.0

Initial Look


One Year On

Driving Simulation: 8
A solid physics model that moved the work done on the original Dirt Rally forward, while some issues do still exist on the tarmac sections, the end result is very satisfying and convincing. Early issues with FFB on Thrustmaster wheels have now been resolved, but the title does still need care with the FFB settings.

Racing Simulation: 7
AI is always tricky to judge in a rally title, as its asynchronous by its very nature, however, the times posted in the rally stages offer a competitive balance for a range of players. The are we can see the AI directly in is the Rallycross and this has improved from the original Dirt Rally, which seemed to be far too challenging for quite a few players.

Motorsport Simulation: 6
Oddly basic in its approach, the career mode, while expanded from the original still offers a limited recreation of how rallying functions in reality, while Rallycross is at least a little more faithful. Points are gained for manual handbrake starts, tyre choice and the service park, however, those looking for a more structured approach may well be disappointed.

Accessibility: 6
The Dirt Rally series seems to revel in its status as the hardcore arm of the Dirt franchise, and as such little is done to welcome in the newcomer or novice, however, gamepad support is reasonable enough, but rally has always been a tough nut to crack on a gamepad. It is however slightly more accessible than the original, so many they are getting a bit soft as time goes on.

Content: 8 (6 at launch)
Very light at launch in terms of locations and stages, with little in that regard transitioning over from the original Dirt Rally, which many assumed would mean it would turn up in paid DLC, something that turned into reality. While much of the recycled content was polished up (Monte Carlo in particular), it did serve as a sticking point for many. The car list, however, for both Rally and Rallycross was good and varied both at launch and in the DLC, with a good mixture of past content returning and new toys to play with. New locations in DLC was limited to Scotland for rally, however, Rallycross was well served, with a host of new locations arriving.

Value: 5 (6 at launch)
With almost as much content locked behind the DLC/Season Pass as was in the base title, value was always going to be a hard sell for Dirt Rally 2.0, made even worse by the fact most of the Rally stages were recycled from the original. This was slightly sweetened by the inclusion of the Colin McRae Flat Out pack into the Season Pass, which did add in new content, also now available in a Game of the Year edition with all the DLC included.


Full Dirt Rally 2.0 Video Playlist

 

[sirjim73]

Dirt Rally 2.0

Initial Look


One Year On


View attachment 944795

Driving Simulation: 8
A solid physics model that moved the work done on the original Dirt Rally forward, while some issues do still exist on the tarmac sections, the end result is very satisfying and convincing. Early issues with FFB on Thrustmaster wheels have now been resolved, but the title does still need care with the FFB settings.

Racing Simulation: 7
AI is always tricky to judge in a rally title, as its asynchronous by its very nature, however, the times posted in the rally stages offer a competitive balance for a range of players. The are we can see the AI directly in is the Rallycross and this has improved from the original Dirt Rally, which seemed to be far too challenging for quite a few players.

Motorsport Simulation: 6
Oddly basic in its approach, the career mode, while expanded from the original still offers a limited recreation of how rallying functions in reality, while Rallycross is at least a little more faithful. Points are gained for manual handbrake starts, tyre choice and the service park, however, those looking for a more structured approach may well be disappointed.

Accessibility: 6
The Dirt Rally series seems to revel in its status as the hardcore arm of the Dirt franchise, and as such little is done to welcome in the newcomer or novice, however, gamepad support is reasonable enough, but rally has always been a tough nut to crack on a gamepad. It is however slightly more accessible than the original, so many they are getting a bit soft as time goes on.

Content: 8 (6 at launch)
Very light at launch in terms of locations and stages, with little in that regard transitioning over from the original Dirt Rally, which many assumed would mean it would turn up in paid DLC, something that turned into reality. While much of the recycled content was polished up (Monte Carlo in particular), it did serve as a sticking point for many. The car list, however, for both Rally and Rallycross was good and varied both at launch and in the DLC, with a good mixture of past content returning and new toys to play with. New locations in DLC was limited to Scotland for rally, however, Rallycross was well served, with a host of new locations arriving.

Value: 5 (6 at launch)
With almost as much content locked behind the DLC/Season Pass as was in the base title, value was always going to be a hard sell for Dirt Rally 2.0, made even worse by the fact most of the Rally stages were recycled from the original. This was slightly sweetened by the inclusion of the Colin McRae Flat Out pack into the Season Pass, which did add in new content, also now available in a Game of the Year edition with all the DLC included.

Love the reviews methodology. 👍

Value is a tricky one though. Why does DR2 go down in value rating after a year? Is that because the DLC was below expectations or something else?

Also, value rating only makes sense at release date to me, as its compared with the full, fixed price.

When looking at a game one year on, few people would likely expect to pay full price even for a GOTY edition.

Example being DR2 which I held off from buying for a long time for the "Value" reasons highlighted in your review. However, when it appeared in the sale at a heavy discount (a month before the base game was free on PS+), I bought the "complete" edition, as it was now worth the cost to me.

So, its Value rating at launch, in my opinion, was very similar to your 6 rating. However, its Value rating after a year was much higher than 6 to me, due to the lower price point. In the same way that you indicate the ACC Value rating is higher because of its lower price point.

I am of the opinion that the other rating categories are OK to include after a year, it is only the Value rating that I consider there are difficulties with.

I hope some of that rambling above makes sense

 

[Dave A]

I imagine the value rating is based on the cost as at the time Scaff purchased it and then re-scored on reflection as at the time of the review rather than what the cost of the game has been at various points inclduing sales and a special offers. I think it would be very hard to account for those periods rather than what the games RRP is.

 

[Morbid65]

Maybe it would be a good idea to mention the price at the time of review with the value rating? Then if the price goes down later people can do their own sorta "math" on it and decide if it's worth it for themselves.

 

[sirjim73]

I imagine the value rating is based on the cost as at the time Scaff purchased it and then re-scored on reflection as at the time of the review rather than what the cost of the game has been at various points inclduing sales and a special offers. I think it would be very hard to account for those periods rather than what the games RRP is.

So, a "hindsight" rating then? I guess that makes sense. And would work for all the categories too.

e.g. "if I knew the physics would improve from release to their current state, what would I have rated them at on release".

I read it as being a review one year on of the position one year on.

Anyway, its Scaff's ratings and reviews, not mine. He can use any system he likes

 

[Scaff]

The value is a tricky one once you get passed the launch period, for Dirt Rally 2.0 I did check on exactly what the prices currently are on the PSN store to get a measure of it, and in that particular case, I dropped it because a lot of the DLC content was recycled from the original, and arguably should have been included in the base product.

 

[MrCrynox]

If it was me I'd score the value at the time of release & make that point clear on the review, copy paste a statement on every review because there are a few reasons why value can change as a game ages be it discounts, price drops or additional free content. I do like the style of your reviews @Scaff & like the new written additions to compliment the videos.

 

[Scaff]

Wreckfest

Review


(Nearly) a Year On

Driving Simulation: 7
Hidden behind a rough and tumble arcade-style title is actually a very solid physics engine, with far more depth than first appears on the surface. It gives Wreckfest far more longevity that you would initially suspect and strikes an excellent balance between pick up and play and depth

Racing Simulation: 7
In the vein of the titles driving style, the AI has to be aggressive, but it manages to achieve a firm balance between aggressiveness and competitiveness. Tied to a good range of AI options it's rare that you feel the AI has done the dirty on you, and on the rare occasions it does, the resulting carnage will probably leave enough of a smile on your face you will not mind too much at all.

Motorsport Simulation: 3
While certain real world motorsport discipline are the root of Wrkefest as a title, it only takes the bare bones of these series, leaving enough to craft a sizable and enjoyable career mode with a good sense of progression.

Accessibility: 7
As mentioned in the Driving simulation area, Wreckfest manages to strike a good balance between pick up and play and depth, it does, however, get a few points docked for some odd design choices. The lack of ability to bind buttons being the main one, this really should be a default option in this day and age. The overall presentation in some areas is also a little rough around the edges, such as replays which may well put some off.

Content: 8
Wreckfest came out of the gate with a good amount of content, as mentioned it comes with a sizable career to start, a good range of tracks and vehicles. The vehicles bolstered by a solid upgrade and cosmetics system that is refreshingly free of monetisation. Over the course of the season pass, they have also added a number of really strong tracks free of charge, as well as a massive amount of new cars and cosmetics on top of this. Finally, a tournament system was added towards the end of the season, adding in a range of daily and weekly challenges, with a new progression system and new vehicle versions to obtain, perfect for those that had finished the career mode and were looking for a new challenge.

Value: 8
Launched as a budget title at £35 Wreckfest offered excellent value for money straight out of the gate, the Season pass was a very fair £19 and is a rare example of a season pass offering strong value for money, particularly when the Deluxe edition, combining the game and season pass can be picked up for £50. Personally, if they were to offer a second season of content that offered similar value I would not hesitate to opt-in and support the developer.


Full Wreckfest Video Playlist

 

[Scaff]

Project Cars 2

One Year On

Driving Simulation 8
Despite the tribal nonsense on the internet the truth is that Project Cars 2 does have a solid physics engine, that does a lot very, very well. It is of course not without faults, but overall it manages to provide a realistic and competent driving simulation that recreates the feel of driving in a manner that demonstrates the great work the tyre model and overall physics engine brings to the table. Live Track 3.0 then takes that and adds another layer of goodness on top of it, ensuring that its not just the cars that are the star, but the way the tracks change and evolve are just as important.

Racing Simulation 6
While Project Cars 2 does offer a wide range of adjustability to the AI, and has moved on from the base laid in the original, the truth is that the AI is competent at its best moments, and downright odd at its worst. The key issue is around finding the right aggression balance, as too low and the nervousness was clear to see in the oddly twitchy wheel changes when cars are side by side, get it too high and it's now carnage. That it isn't consistent from car to car or track to track remains the biggest issue, find a good combination and its great, don't and its a mess.

Motorsport Simulation 8
While not attempting to mirror anyone motorsport discipline, what Project Cars 2 does, however, allow you to do is recreate just about any real-world series you want. You may need to do the hard work, but with options that many, many other titles miss out on, PC2 shows that it can be done. Just about the only thing missing is customer championships, had that been added it would be close to perfection in this regards. Even with this omission, PC2 remains the Sandpit for Motorsport fans.

Accessibility 6
While PC2 did make changes to the original to make it more accessible, it has to be said that it remains a difficult title for people to get into. The FFB and gamepad use still require a good among of tweaking to get right, enough to put off a lot of people. While steps were made in the right direction, such as the Race Engineer that will tweak set-ups based on your feedback and a range of default set-ups to use as a base, easy to implement options, such as tyre warmers for all cars were missing.

Content 8
Project Cars 2, even without the DLC content, offers one of the finest track line-ups of any racing title released, while the car list is, in my view, excellently balanced, offering a good range of vehicles, with little padding via cheap duplicates. Add in a large career mode and the sandpit options in both single and multiplayer and you have a volume of cars, tracks, time of day, weather, etc. that will keep most occupied for years.

Value 7
At launch the variety of tracks was varied and close to complete, however a good number of cars (around 20% of the final count) was locked into the DLC. Price-wise you are looking at what could be considered average prices for the base title and £25 for the season pass, however, a deluxe edition is available for £70 that contains everything and is a common sight in various sales.

Full Project Cars 2 Video Playlist

 

[MagpieRacer]

Project Cars 2

One Year On


View attachment 946743

Driving Simulation 8
Despite the tribal nonsense on the internet the truth is that Project Cars 2 does have a solid physics engine, that does a lot very, very well. It is of course not without faults, but overall it manages to provide a realistic and competent driving simulation that recreates the feel of driving in a manner that demonstrates the great work the tyre model and overall physics engine brings to the table. Live Track 3.0 then takes that and adds another layer of goodness on top of it, ensuring that its not just the cars that are the star, but the way the tracks change and evolve are just as important.

Racing Simulation 6
While Project Cars 2 does offer a wide range of adjustability to the AI, and has moved on from the base laid in the original, the truth is that the AI is competent at its best moments, and downright odd at its worst. The key issue is around finding the right aggression balance, as too low and the nervousness was clear to see in the oddly twitchy wheel changes when cars are side by side, get it too high and it's now carnage. That it isn't consistent from car to car or track to track remains the biggest issue, find a good combination and its great, don't and its a mess.

Motorsport Simulation 8
While not attempting to mirror anyone motorsport discipline, what Project Cars 2 does, however, allow you to do is recreate just about any real-world series you want. You may need to do the hard work, but with options that many, many other titles miss out on, PC2 shows that it can be done. Just about the only thing missing is customer championships, had that been added it would be close to perfection in this regards. Even with this omission, PC2 remains the Sandpit for Motorsport fans.

Accessibility 6
While PC2 did make changes to the original to make it more accessible, it has to be said that it remains a difficult title for people to get into. The FFB and gamepad use still require a good among of tweaking to get right, enough to put off a lot of people. While steps were made in the right direction, such as the Race Engineer that will tweak set-ups based on your feedback and a range of default set-ups to use as a base, easy to implement options, such as tyre warmers for all cars were missing.

Content 8
Project Cars 2, even without the DLC content, offers one of the finest track line-ups of any racing title released, while the car list is, in my view, excellently balanced, offering a good range of vehicles, with little padding via cheap duplicates. Add in a large career mode and the sandpit options in both single and multiplayer and you have a volume of cars, tracks, time of day, weather, etc. that will keep most occupied for years.

Value 7
At launch the variety of tracks was varied and close to complete, however a good number of cars (around 20% of the final count) was locked into the DLC. Price-wise you are looking at what could be considered average prices for the base title and £25 for the season pass, however, a deluxe edition is available for £70 that contains everything and is a common sight in various sales.

Full Project Cars 2 Video Playlist

Bang on my friend. Personally as an incompetent pad user I'd put accessibility at a 4 but that's just me.

Really enjoying this review format, keep it up.

 

[MrCrynox]

@ Scaff will you be doing a written review for WRC8 & then 9 ?

 

[Scaff]

@ Scaff will you be doing a written review for WRC8 & then 9 ?

Yep, will be doing so, next on my list (WRC8) and as I have WRC9 Pre-ordered that one will follow as soon as I can.

 

[Scaff]

Overpass

Review

Intro
Overpass aims to open up a new category in the racing genre, and in that regard it does its job, based around extreme off-roading you have two categories of vehicles, All-Terrain Vehicles and Quad-bikes, with a roughly equal vehicle count between them. The events are broken down into two types, obstacle courses and hill climbs, both run against the clock, a number of different environments are available as well as the ability to run these as a form of free roam.

Driving Simulation: 6
On the face of it Overpass falls into an interesting category, one in which going slowly is the quickest way, and knowing when to go quickly and when to take your
time is key. Gaining an understanding of when to use the 2wd, 4wd and the diff lock are key to getting the most out of the vehicles, however, these elements are handled in what can only be described as a simplistic manner. Open and flattish ground, pop it in 2WD and go quicker, getting rough pop it into 4wd but you drop speed, getting really muddy or slippy, pop on the diff lock and steering reduces; it really doesn't gain any more depth than that unfortunately. Rolling the vehicle is also a constant danger and at times can feel unfair as it's very tricky to look around you when manoeuvring (Mudrunner and Snowrunner do this aspect much better), and when you reset its often in a position that actually makes things worse, something that is even more true of the Hillclimb events. This is even worse in the quads, as you have to also balance the rider, and as such the roll-overs become even more unfair feeling, to the point that I simply stopped attempting to use them.

Racing Simulation: 3
As all the events are against the clock, you never get to see your opponents in action, just the end results and these fall into one of two camps. Astoundingly slow for obstacle races, and absurdly quick for Hill Climbs, with the end result being an AI that doesn't work for either, given that some championships mix these two event types up compounds the problem even further.

Motorsport Simulation: 3
While the disciplines in Overpass are based around real-world ones, the attempt to incorporate a feeling of that into the title is minimal, and instead, you are faced with an overly complicated system of rounds, in a season, with a permanent damage mechanic that requires you to send vehicles away for repair and not have access to them if they get too banged up in a previous round. It's a nice idea, but it's overcomplicated and not well explained at all. The entire career lurches from offering an open form path to heavy-handed linear control of your path with no warning and feels disjointed as a result, particularly as upgrades to the vehicles are locked behind event completion (and you then have to pay for them), but you don't know what they are until you unlock them.

Accessibility: 3
As has already been mentioned the career structure is messy, with very little to assist you in knowing what to do, the tutorial provided allows you to skip sections, almost as if it knows they are unbalanced and don't really work. Wheel support is provided, however its certainly a title better played with a gamepad, as the Quads simply don't work with a wheel as you can't balance the rider at all. Wheel support itself is also basic and appears to be a very much tacked on afterthought, the only thing you can adjust is overall FFB, for which the slider ranges from 'limp as an overcooked noodle' to 'nope, you're not turning that at all', however, it's not a linear scale on the slider, it gets about 2/3rd of the way along and just jumps. When using a wheel the soft lock comes into play at utterly random moments, I'm not sure if this is to try and provide a tyre stuck on something affect or not, but it's just unpleasant and ineffective. Honestly, I would steer well clear of using Overpass with a wheel (pun intended). Then we get to sound, now not something I would normally include within accessibility, but in this case, it's the single biggest reason why I can only play Overpass in short doses, as most of the vehicles have CVT boxes and small buzzy engines, and the end result is an engine note that is one constant high pitched buzz that is just grating to the extreme.

Content: 3
On the face of it content does seem to be quite generous for Overpass, but as you start to explore, it soon becomes apparent that falls into two halves. The locations, obstacles races and hill climbs are generous in number, particularly given this is a new IP. The vehicles, however, are a different story, with half of the content effectively a tier below because of the awful rider balance mechanism for the quad-bikes, and a number of the vehicles are locked behind day one paid DLC, taking what is already a low vehicle count down even further. The content is hampered further by the lacklustre career mode, which even if it was more accessible is simply short on events and stuff to do.

Value: 3
Had Overpass been released as a budget title it would have made up for a lot of these shortcomings, however, the simple fact is that as a full-price release, with content locked behind paid day 1 DLC its simply poor value for money given the relatively sparse content and career mode.

Summary
Overpass t me very much feels like a missed opportunity, its got the makings of an excellent title with an approach to driving games that fits an interesting point between the likes of Mudrunner and Snowrunner and the more traditional off-road titles such as WRC and Dirt. However, it's simply not executed well enough, with borderline unusable wheel support, half the vehicles an utter pain to use ad a career which is a mess to progress through and suffers from an unbalanced AI. Its a real shame because at times I really enjoyed Overpass and the concept is excellent, however, the issues start to grate too quickly and are too serious to recommend it as anything more than a vaguely interesting curio if you can pick it up dirt cheap.

 

[PJTierney]

Oh I like these, well done.

 

[Scaff]

Oh I like these, well done.

Thanks, hope you found the Dirt 2.0 one fair.

 

[dlshearon]

@Scaff Great review on Overpass!
As someone who has played the game and an offroad nut, you hit the nail on the head.

 

[Scaff]

@Scaff Great review on Overpass!
As someone who has played the game and an offroad nut, you hit the nail on the head.

That's great to hear, I've quite a bit of off-road experience, but in quite, quite different vehicles (Land Rovers) but the knowledge transfers well.

 

[Mr Grumpy]

@Scaff, I'm waiting for your Fast & Furious review

 

[Scaff]

@Scaff, I'm waiting for your Fast & Furious review

I do plan to do one, but not at full retail, I'm not quite insane enough to drop that kind of money on it!

 

[Mr Grumpy]

I do plan to do one, but not at full retail, I'm not quite insane enough to drop that kind of money on it!

Something tells me you won't have to wait long.

 

[Scaff]

Something tells me you won't have to wait long.

I might even get to do it before PC3 releases.

 

[PJTierney]

Thanks, hope you found the Dirt 2.0 one fair.

Totally fair.

The Value stat may be higher for people looking at GOTY but if people have the Standard Edition they're missing out on half the game.