You talking about the series of corners up the top of the track, or the climb up the hill with the jumps.
I'm not a fan of the track as such, but that sequence of corners after the left at the top of the hill, down through that left hander onto the back straight is brilliant - it rewards tight apexes and faith in the car to be fast there - quite thrilling.
Are you talking about the rail road tracks that go across the course?
In any case, what ever part you are talking about, lower your stabalizer and spring rate settings. Seattle is an unforgiving course when it comes bumbs and altitude changes.
yeah, the hill. its just a series of jumps that have no place in a race sim....
all they had to do was make it a str8 single hill and all would be good....
Originally posted by ving yeah, the hill. its just a series of jumps that have no place in a race sim....
all they had to do was make it a str8 single hill and all would be good....
I'm inclined to agree - the jumps are a bit silly. Does make you think about your braking point heading up the hill there, though, I've had some B I G accidents there after missing my braking point.
I think that Seattle II holds up better as a race track. All those jumps work better going downhill, and the beginning sections around the Dome are more fun going reverse.
Originally posted by Dolbytone I think that Seattle II holds up better as a race track. All those jumps work better going downhill, and the beginning sections around the Dome are more fun going reverse.
Originally posted by alexy2k Your Kidding Right? As a race track those hills are great fun but phew in real life the front bumper is very vulnuerable.. :eeK:
I don't understand how going reverse is more of an issue than going forwards, and thus the reason you choose to single my post out. Of course the bumper is vulnerable, and in real life, I'm sure we'd all go much slower over these sections. That has nothing to do with what I said though.
