this would be like if Ferrari made a terrible car, and then plastered it all over their website. no. not false advertising either.
There are no longer distinctions made between Premium and Standard cars as in the previous version of GT, but Standard equivalent cars will only have simplified cockpit views.
I mean isn't it misleading or even false advertising? If you go to GT's website you will never see photos of them and even on this website every banner selling GT has beautiful renders of premium cars, which of course are in the game but they are the minority.
Shouldn't we get banners with one of these cars as well? What do you think?View attachment 202265
![]()
^ Cover car right there.
They could put some spectators on the cover![]()
And it should remain so as well. Although, they could use the Yellowbird for the cover.PD doesn't put in-game car pictures on cover. They put artistic car pictures.
What am I looking at? Is she/he taking a dump?
That was exactly what came to my mind when I took the picWhat am I looking at? Is she/he taking a dump?
![]()
But should have wheels on it. (ba dum tss)Actually this should be the cover for GT7!
this would be like if Ferrari made a terrible car, and then plastered it all over their website. no. not false advertising either.
In a society that is obsessed with looks and in an industry that's obsessed with high quality graphics, you really think having the least detailed car on the cover is a great idea?
They could put a car made with 10 polygons on the cover I couldn't care less, the problem is poor detailed cars are IN the game.
Pretty Graphics still sell games and I guarantee more people will not buy a current game if its cover looks like its from the PS1 era. You and a few won't care, but many more will.
What about Minecraft?
Minecraft isn't even a franchise like GT is so it doesn't even come close counting. That game was designed from the start to look like that unlike the Big titles.
ha!Not only have they made bad cars, they've created minisites for them too.