- 1,397
no. thats the 300SL.
google image search seems to be working. some keystrokes, a few moments waiting,... voila!!!
google image search seems to be working. some keystrokes, a few moments waiting,... voila!!!
neanderthala 60s mercedes 300SEL 6.3.
300 horses in a staid looking benz. remove the 6.3 badge and one would ever know the difference, there was no external difference between the 6 cylinder and V8 versions.
PublicSecrecySome day im going to kill whoever invented the V8...argh!!!!![]()
Petermcjoea new S4 with A4 badging. a regualr 1.8t is 0-60 in like 8 sec. an S4 is mid 5's
Monster7My personal car, 1986 Omni GLH Turbo.
It has been lightened and weighs in at 2160 lbs with a full tank of race gas. With nothing more than a boost controller, 3" cat-back and a clutch, it has beaten numerous Camaro's including a '69 SS 396, a couple Mustangs, a modified Lancer Evolution, and the last race before the old motor gave out - a brand new SRT-4. I won by a little over a car length.![]()
![]()
cardude2004You guys say that Buick's are good and I think that they are awful. We had one as a rental car when we drove to Minneapolis last week. It had bad performance compared to my father Infiniti G35 or something. When you braked the car to feet to stop. It felt like you were never going to stop. When you started out all of the cars passed you at the stoplight.
Victor Vance*looks at M5P's sig*
What do you hate the 1.8T for?
Bonus points for half-vinyl top. 👍Drifting ThundaHere's your Buick sleeper
It ran 10.36 seconds @ 136.89 mph at the track.![]()
neanderthali nearly bit on a $8000 E30 M3 when i bought my mercedes, but i needed a reliable daily driver whose parts would cost a fortune, so i chose the benz.
Didn't even notice that 👍skip0110Bonus points for half-vinyl top. 👍