- 963
- United Kingdom
You do know this is a forum, right, not an echo chamber?
Yes I am aware of that, I think you're the one need to be reminded of this with the way you insist that everyone agrees with you on everything otherwise you'll dogpile them with essay posts of pure drivel.
A forum having opinions! By god, get the fainting chair!
You. And you're free to have that opinion. But otherwise...
Man up and take your own advice.
He goes and proves my point with the added bonus of a poorly disguised insult. Wasteman.
Again, take your own advice.
Why are you still replying then telling others not to respond? That desperate to get the last word in? You're beyond a wasteman, you're a wastegash.
Sophy is being worked on but how many more years question at this point becomes something like complaining a developer taking some time to make a new game and not that a sequel came out instantly.
The confirmation that is given is that Sophy won't be available at launch. But that won't mean they are doing nothing about it.
Yh being honest this game is probably gonna be similar to how it is now for the rest of its life. I probably won't be buying another GT game after the disappointment this turned out to be. A single player racing game that had less then a 3rd of races (90) than GT sport with over 300 races. Just because we got missions and circuit experience that doesn't mean we shouldn't get races. So they make credits take ages to build up and give us barely any races? So we have to keep rinsing the same races over and over in order to get any credits. Honestly what an absolute joke. The online mode even pays like garbage compared to GT sport so the only way to switch things up and its not even worth doing unless its just for a bit of fun but as far as credits go its just not worth it.
So put it on hard take all the graphics off and play with a wheel a clutch pedal and proper gears OR if your that good stop playing racing games and do it for real.
Most of the game's difficulty comes from the AI being literal miles ahead of you and you being unable to make up the difference. More often then not the difficulty 'settings' don't matter, because it's either that, or you blitz them, either because the event actually has (slight) differences in AI pace or you just decide to build a car right to the PP limit and blast by them anyway, so the difficulty settings don't matter anyway once more.
Thats what he was doing, defending.
A lot actually. I've even had yellow flag situations for accidents ahead of me. And I'll be uploading a video tonight of a race I did last night at Catalunya where I finished 2nd because the lead car was apparently drinking some of that Sophy juice. Got within 1.5 seconds but a pass was impossible.
That's a problem that can be very easily fixed at a structural level, if Polyphony simply realized that the AI has been bad for more then a decade now. They haven't.
As a helper. We have no idea whether or not it will be actually implemented as an AI system, only that Polyphony sees Sophy, at the moment, as a helper, and at most a potential online challenge to see who in the community can 'beat' Sophy in a one off event. Nowhere in the Sophy presentation or papers did they say that Sophy would be implemented as an AI opponent, and considering the fact that the experiment needed however many PS4's hooked up to a cloud network in order to work, we can surmise quite easily that Sophy is not coming to PS4, a not insignificant part of the player base. So what do you expect these players to do? Buy a PS5 to get competent AI and difficulty settings?
Way to think highly of yourself.
Yes, how dare people be concerned about and want to discuss the state of the single-player AI in the single-player portion of the game. /s
The notion of "things will get better with updates" isn't exactly a great one, especially since we do not know for sure that the AI will be touched at all in future updates. I'd prefer not to give PD cop-outs in areas that they 100% have the capability of being better in.
We still don't know in what capacity Sophie will be used, if any. At no point has PD and/or Sony said that Sophie would replace all of GT7s AI.
I would be more inclined to believe that if the AI didn't A) move over so far away from the corner entry (I could see it if it was basically almost immediately before the ideal braking zone), and B) visibly slow down before hitting the brakes.
Hmm, I'll take your word for it there since it's only one clip.
I was coming up on him quick in the slipstream and he moved over to protect the inside. Not sure what kind of racing you watch but that was a fairly normal move from the real world that I'm happy to see the AI do. Bonus that he made a mistake and it cost him the position. I see nothing but positives in that clip.
That is ultimately the most frustrating part. The AI does seem to be, on the whole, better. Not massively, but a bit.
I do feel the AI is massively better because It blocks, slipstreams, and can actually keep pace now, and there is no longer a car that is massively faster even in one make. I have had an edge of my seat races, I haven't had races like that since GT3 and more recently PC2. In that GT3 race, I mentioned, I had THREE cars attempt to overtake me, which means that behind me they were overtaking each other. In Sport, the AI would never pass themselves past the first few turns..
Yes, nothing wrong with realistic rolling starts.
Well I mean yeah it's better, but it's still got a long way to go before it's on the same level as some competitors, so we still need to push PD to improve it further in terms of pace and racecraft.
