Energizerrr
(Banned)
- 1,115
I'd love my Yugo to be in GT5 too, but I'm not the one starting yet another "THIS MUST BE IN GT, HI PD PLEASE^^" thread.
beeblebrox237The biggest disappointment in GT5 for me was getting in the Veyron and taking it for I drive, and discovering I couldn't use interior view.
EliteDreamerThe SSC and the new Tuatara are both ugly. The SSC is especially a disaster. If I may share my opinion since everyone else seems to doing the same.
Really, I see no possibility of it ever being in a Gran Turismo game.
EliteDreamerI'm not saying the Veyron is good looking. It is in it's own class of unatractiveness, and so are the SSC and the Tuatara. But the Veyron has more class if you know what I mean.
The McLaren is definitely the best of the world record smashers. 👍
EliteDreamerThe SSC and the new Tuatara are both ugly. The SSC is especially a disaster. If I may share my opinion since everyone else seems to doing the same.
Really, I see no possibility of it ever being in a Gran Turismo game.
I still prefer the legendary McLaren F1, it's almost as fast and out turns both! It's comfortable, naturally aspirated (no turbo lag), has the greatest sports car award: overall victory at Le Mans! It actually looks good, you sit in the middle, and it's considered "The greatest super car of all time" by many sources... Read my signature'
Correction: it is not faster then the Veyron. That is, not faster then the Super Sport.![]()
No.
A 6.3L V8 compared to an 8L W16. Yeah, it's a ridiculously big engine alright...
It wasn't built for luxury.
This "engineering beauty" motif is entirely avoiding why it was engineered the way it was in the first place.
Again, it's engine isn't bigger, and it's top speed was only that after the two runs were averaged; on it's first run it was already quicker than the original Veyron.
I won't even bother with the rest as you've already made yourself look foolish enough.
To the OP: I wish they have the Agera R & Vemon GT in the game. Claimed top speed on both 275MPH. Now add them & Test Course in-game then let GT5's physics engine decide how fast they really are.
The Aero is not a good car, it just brute forces its way into speed and does nothing else good, its not a good track car and its not a useable day to day car.
Actually Shelby Supercars is working on the next variation of the Aero that will stomp out the Veyron Super Sport. It isn't a matter of IF it will, it is just a matter of WHEN it will beat the current top speed record.
LOL, if you're trying to start an argument over the most "useable day to day car" then neither the Ultimate Aero nor the Veyron should be anywhere near the discussion. These aren't designed to be your daily commuters.![]()
^ One of the main reasons is that Bugatti had a flat, long, straight test track to do their top speed run, while SSC only had a closed public road, with kinks, and lots of undulations. It could theoretically do 275mph!
Anyways, I'm not really fond of the Aero, but the SSC Tuatara:
![]()
DLC me wants!![]()
SSC Ultimate Aero is a junk.
I still prefer the legendary McLaren F1, it's almost as fast and out turns both!
The Aero is not a good car, it just brute forces its way into speed and does nothing else good, its not a good track car and its not a useable day to day car.
How is it not a Diablo Kit car? It runs on a Diablo replica chassis and it looks like a Diablo.
A bad drag co-efficient you say? Is that why it's .357 compared to the Veyron's .36? You having fun making yourself look more and more foolish?My point with the difference between the Aero and Veyron is simply down to the Aero being a kit car with a bad drag co-efficient...
Funny, because the Veyron has a "massively" powerful engine to offset it's weight and to achieve the speed it did....offset by a massively powerful engine specifically designed to go faster than the Veyron.
Really? Do you...do you own one? Have you taken one around the track...any track?its not a good track car and its not a useable day to day car.
That's seriously hilarious who ever assumes weight has nothing to do with speed. Its physics and if you don't like it then don't bother posting because you make yourself look stupid.
EliteDreamerI think the Veyron was. Why else would there be luxury included?
God this thread is so stupid. All these wankers who keep thinking the Veyron SS is faster because it had miles of more straight then the UA had. I mean seriously as I said before. DO THE MATH. The UA is built around aerodynamics and its built around weight. GUESS WHAT, yes weight has a lot to do with top end speed! That's seriously hilarious who ever assumes weight has nothing to do with speed. More HP and less weight with greater aerodynamics means it will go faster. Its physics and if you don't like it then don't bother posting because you make yourself look stupid. If SSC really wanted to they could take their product to the same track and blow the Veyrons doors off. Sadly SSC wasn't bothering because they already had the Tuatara in the making when VW released the SS. Research people.
Am I the only one frustrated by the fact that the Shelby Super Cars Ultimate Aero is faster than a Veyron, yet is not on GT5?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/SSC_Ultimate_Aero_TT_-_1.jpg