Statistical anomalies in motorsports.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Carbonox
  • 414 comments
  • 83,982 views
Not a statistical anomaly but the Jordan 198 used Elf fuel and lubricants despite being sponsored by Repsol.
 
I suggest that was soley a decision made by the engine supplier and their lubricants partner.
 
Lotus won the 1972 Constructors Championship with just one driver scoring points.
 
And, as with most cumulative records, a lot to do with less races per year back in the day. Drivers don't stick around on rubbish teams, which Williams have been for most of the 18+ race per year era.
Mansell is their most capped driver with 95 starts. He drove 6 full years plus a few races. That would would be 130+ races these days.
 
Barra333
And, as with most cumulative records, a lot to do with less races per year back in the day. Drivers don't stick around on rubbish teams, which Williams have been for most of the 18+ race per year era.
Mansell is their most capped driver with 95 starts. He drove 6 full years plus a few races. That would would be 130+ races these days.
Click to expand...
Mansell also wanted to stick around at the end of 1992 and defend his title in 1993.
Much to Frank Williams' surprise, he had no interest in doing so for pocket change.
 
Who would've expected that a guy who had a framed photo of Thatcher on his desk would put such little value on labour.
 
XuKJzH0.jpeg


In Connor Zilisch's first 11 NASCAR Infinity Series races this year, he had an average finish of 16.8

Then in the Talladega race he got injured and sat out the Texas race

After that he came back and went on an absolute tear and now has an average finish of 2.1 over the last 15 races, including 15 straight top 5 finishes, which is unheard of in stock car racing
 
Last edited:
Car #4 finally produces a Formula 1 World Champion!

(Since the practice of running the same race numbers throughout the season was introduced in 1974)

Don't care if it's anomalous or not.
 
Har1MAS1415
Car #4 finally produces a Formula 1 World Champion!

(Since the practice of running the same race numbers throughout the season was introduced in 1974)

Don't care if it's anomalous or not.
Click to expand...

#4 was stuck on the number-two Tyrrell from 1974 to 1995, so Patrick Depailler was the only one to win with that number until Frentzen managed it 19 years later.

Interestingly, nine previous world champs won races with car #4, with six of them winning a race in their championship years.

Oh, the anomalies of entrant distribution and whatever favoritism the organizers decided at the time. Did your transporter arrive first in the paddock? You get car numbers 1-2-3...or maybe number 31-32-33 because we said so, and we're reserving #1 for the local driver.
 
Last edited:
There is, was or has been a Formula 1 champion from Great Britain in every decade except the 1980s.
 
Alan Kulwicki was a famous underdog NASCAR champion with a more consistent than fast pace, but did you know that in the 1992 season in question, he never had more than 2 successive top 10's at any point in the 29 race season? The core difference to earlier seasons, where he already was fast but unreliable, was that the off days were still often yielding top 15's that were worth a respectable amount of points, keeping him in the fight. Elliott's win streak alone was 4 races long, and 6 other drivers, including Irvan and Earnhardt outside the final top 10, had top 5 streaks longer than Kulwicki's best top 10 streak.

Also, with Elliott having a wreck at the Daytona 500 and then winning rounds 2-5 while Allison won the 500 and gathered consistent top 5's in all of the following races, there was a point after the Darlington round where Elliott had won 80% of the races without leading in the points.
 
In the F1 2025 season, the top 5 at the end of the first lap of the first race, were the top 5 in the final championship standings.

It really was all over after 1 lap.
 
Last edited:

Not sure if this is really statical anomaly but I think this might be a sport to put it for comments.

I saw an interesting social media provocation that said to rank the last four first time champions :
2010 VET, 2016 ROS, 2021 VER, 2025 NOR

So I thought a little, and it occurred to me that these were all very close championships decided in the final round. Could have easily gone either way - so good suspense for keeping fans watching, but in the end perhaps unconvincing titles. I did a little analysis, it is google AI assisted to generate this so it might have errors so if there are some please let me know (and use appropriate AI to moderate your frustration).


Year
Driver
Winner Points
Margin (Points)
Margin (%)

1985
Alain Prost
73
20
27.4%

1988
Ayrton Senna
90 *
3 *
3.3% * *

1992
Nigel Mansell
108
52
48.1%

1994
Michael Schumacher
92
1
1.1% *

1996
Damon Hill
97
19
19.6%

1997
Jacques Villeneuve
81
3
3.7% * *

1998
Mika Häkkinen
100
14
14.0%

2005
Fernando Alonso
133
21
15.8%

2007
Kimi Räikkönen
110
1
0.9% *

2008
Lewis Hamilton
98
1
1.0% *

2009
Jenson Button
95
11
11.6%

2010
Sebastian Vettel
256
4
1.6% *

2016
Nico Rosberg
385
5
1.3% *

2021
Max Verstappen
395.5 *
8 *
2.0% * *

2025
Lando Norris
265
2
0.8% *

It looks like Alonso and Button are the only first time champs since 2000 with a convincing winning margin percentage. However, ironically perhaps, the anecdotal comments are often that these titles might be heavily dependent on superior equipment in form of mass-damper fitted chassis with Michelin tyres in 2005 and the famous double-diffuser brawn in 2009.

Additional caveats for years with the double stars, these I reckon are the most unconvincing / over-rated championships. Yeh many of these drivers went on to more consistent performance and deservingly earned massive kudos from most sides, but I’m just looking at the first titles.

1988 Prost actually scored more points over the season but only best 11 results counted.

1997 should have been wrapped up early, it was travesty to the car that the WDC was not locked in before the final race.

2007 Kimi was awesome to pinch that title from drivers bickering and trading away points with the best machinery. This isn't actually unconvincing or over-rated.

2008 Hamilton getting a point from Glock? meh.

2010 Webber took points off Alonso a couple of times in the season where Vettel was behind both, if Alonso beat Webber in those races he would have been Champ.

2016 Rosberg crashed into Hamilton in Spain, and tried another thou-shalt-not-pass collision in Austria so he was willing to overstep sportsmanship, the team backed him anyway and he still only won by 5 points after Hamilton lost an engine while leading a race late in the season.

2021 the stars aligned when Latifi crashed the allowed Verstappen to take a free pitstop for tyres and get caught up behind Hamilton. The debacle of the race direction implosion just made it 99.99% instead of 95%. Max inherited the championship due to Latifi and the FIA / race director turned it into a full blow f-up.

2025 Norris won by points given to him by his team mate being ordered out of the way after a slow pitstop. Lame. The teams could have put in orders at the end of the season if they hadn’t swapped early say some pundits and punters. That would still be lame.
 
From 1994 to 1998, the winner of the opening round of the BTCC went on to win the title; a five-year streak and it was a different champion in a different car every time.

1994 - Tarquini wins at Thruxton and takes the title for Alfa Romeo
1995 - Cleland wins at Donington Park and takes the title for Vauxhall
1996 - Biela wins at Donington Park and takes the title for Audi
1997 - Menu wins at Donington Park and takes the title for Renault
1998 - Rydell wins at Thruxton and takes the title for Volvo

Irrelevantly to the sequence, it was also true in 1991 for Will Hoy and Alain Menu again in 2000 in the supertouring era. The only years it wasn't true were:

1992 - Cleland wins at Silverstone but Harvey takes the title
1993 - Soper wins at Silverstone but Winkelhock takes the title
1999 - Thompson wins at Donington Park but Aiello takes the title

Is such a streak, particularly different drivers and cars/teams, comparable in other series? A streak of different drivers winning opening races then winning the title.
 
Last edited:
Barra333
I think 5 manufacturers in 5 years is a tough one to beat
Click to expand...
Certainly would be in Australian touring cars.

If you're just going on manufacturers, you can add BMW in 1993, Nissan in 1999 and Ford in 2000 either side for eight consecutively different manufacturers.
 
Last edited:
Liquid
From 1994 to 1998, the winner of the opening round of the BTCC went on to win the title; a five-year streak and it was a different champion in a different car every time.

1994 - Tarquini wins at Thruxton and takes the title for Alfa Romeo
1995 - Cleland wins at Donington Park and takes the title for Vauxhall
1996 - Biela wins at Donington Park and takes the title for Audi
1997 - Menu wins at Donington Park and takes the title for Renault
1998 - Rydell wins at Thruxton and takes the title for Volvo

Irrelevantly to the sequence, it was also true in 1991 for Will Hoy and Alain Menu again in 2000 in the supertouring era. The only years it wasn't true were:

1992 - Cleland wins at Silverstone but Harvey takes the title
1993 - Soper wins at Silverstone but Winkelhock takes the title
1999 - Thompson wins at Donington Park but Aiello takes the title

Is such a streak, particularly different drivers and cars/teams, comparable in other series? A streak of different drivers winning opening races then winning the title.
Click to expand...
The thing I also remember from the early half of that BTCC era, was that the championship winning car while, obviously, being the most consistent, it wasn't the very best car the whole year through.
1993: BMW won the title but Ford Mondeo was the car to have towards the end.
1994: Alfa wins the chocolates but the field was so open that it wasn't always the best on race day. Again, Ford peaked, as did Vauxhall, Toyota, and Renault came on strong with the new Laguna. And so on.
The dominance of certain cars changed like the seasons, and that made it one of the best championships to follow because it was so unpredictable.
 
Pete05
The thing I also remember from the early half of that BTCC era, was that the championship winning car while, obviously, being the most consistent, it wasn't the very best car the whole year through.
Click to expand...
You can add a few more years to that as well:

1992 - The E36 BMW was terrible at the beginning. It was a straight fight between Vauxhall and Toyota until halfway through the season.

1996 - Biela's Audi conquered until (rightly or wrongly) the ballast brought BMW, Renault and Honda into the picture.

1998 - Rydell's Volvo was great all year but by the end, Nissan had improved exponentionally and went on to domimate in 1999.
 
Liquid
Certainly would be in Australian touring cars.

If you're just going on manufacturers, you can add BMW in 1993, Nissan in 1999 and Ford in 2000 either side for eight consecutively different manufacturers.
Click to expand...
That is a wild stat. There are very few series in the world that would have 8 manufacturers competitive in the same decade, let alone winning consecutive years.
 

Latest Posts

Back