No, I never said anything like that. What I am saying is that Timo Glock hasn't scored any points yet because he isn't as good as the people that do.
Except now your talking about a team that doesn't have the budget of some of the others, so that has hampered him some yes, but IF Timo was as fast as let's say Groesjean or Paul Di Resta then would he not be at a team that does have a better budget?
What a twisted logic, you really want me to explain why Glock isn't in a position to score points?
Fine then:
-Quite fricking clearly he can't score points as he is in a car that cannot. You put any driver in a Marussia - Alonso, Vettel, Hamilton..anyone - they would not score points either. Hence this "points = largely skill" logic is pretty flawed.
-Glock isn't in a better team because in 2009 the team he was in left the sport. He didn't have many options and didn't bring money, so he ended up at Virgin/Marussia as they wanted an experienced and skilled driver to lead the team. The reason he is still there is because 1.) he still doesn't bring money to grab a seat elsewhere and 2.) he's easily forgotten about now - which in turn is caused by the earlier point about being in a crap car.
If you even begin to take a couple of seconds to think about it, you quickly realise judging a driver's skill just by his points is a pretty flawed logic.
Of course, to score wins, points, championships..you need skill. But you need a lot of other things too. I would never agree that its "the main reason".
The "main reason" is the overall package - its a team sport after all. Why is Alonso top of the table? Because he's bloody good, he's got a reliable car, his team generally give him safe and good strategies, the Ferrari seems to be consistently top 5-6 material and all of his rivals are suffering from severe inconsistencey. Its not "mainly" Alonso's skill that has him there - its a combination of factors.