The best way I can honestly see F1 bettering its situation in america....

  • Thread starter Thread starter A2K78
  • 69 comments
  • 3,472 views
Our TV gets F1, and that's it. Only way to see almost anything else is to get Motors TV, which has a good coverage of motorsport or Eurosport, which shows Le Mans 24H and occasionally some other series. Neither of those are common channels in an average household.
From what im aware of though he is including cable, indycar is mostly shown on NBC Sports which is Cable from what I know.

Here in oz you can only see part of F1 and Part of V8 Supercars then basically every series on the Planet is on Fox Sports. Here in Oz all sports are mostly on Cable/Fox Sports.
 
Doesn't change the fact, most motorsports don't get any time on mainstream TV here. My situation is better, though, we have all, Eurosport, Eurosport 2 and Motors TV available in our house.
So do I. I'm just saying.
 
1. Having an American-based team ---- check

Nearly

2. Having an American Driver --- to be determined

Probably will happen, they'll have to be a lot better than the hilariously-named "Scott Speed" though.

3. Having multiple races in the states ---??

No, it's a world series. It's rare for a country to host multiple events (not unheard of though, and they have to be differently-named). Bernie may well ignore my opposition of course (he often does) and hold NJ and Austin in the same calendar. There are already other races on America of course, in Brazil and Canada.

4. Moving the season opener to america as oppose to australia

I'm not sure what difference that would make - to fans who don't care a race is a race.

The opener is in Australia for logistical reasons, the Pacific races are grouped before the teams return to Europe. Holding the opener on the American continent would require better weather in Interlagos/Montreal than is normal for the season.

As I believe I've said before... I just don't think that the US will take to F1 in such a wholesale way. I don't think the advertisers will like a 2-hour long race that isn't compartmentalised for advertising and I don't think that many of the fans will be so interested in "Euro"-style racing when the format is so different from Nascar-style racing.

That's not to say that the fanbase can't grow in the US but I don't see F1 ever getting a "big" hold.
 
Nearly



Probably will happen, they'll have to be a lot better than the hilariously-named "Scott Speed" though.



No, it's a world series. It's rare for a country to host multiple events (not unheard of though, and they have to be differently-named). Bernie may well ignore my opposition of course (he often does) and hold NJ and Austin in the same calendar. There are already other races on America of course, in Brazil and Canada.



I'm not sure what difference that would make - to fans who don't care a race is a race.

The opener is in Australia for logistical reasons, the Pacific races are grouped before the teams return to Europe. Holding the opener on the American continent would require better weather in Interlagos/Montreal than is normal for the season.

As I believe I've said before... I just don't think that the US will take to F1 in such a wholesale way. I don't think the advertisers will like a 2-hour long race that isn't compartmentalised for advertising and I don't think that many of the fans will be so interested in "Euro"-style racing when the format is so different from Nascar-style racing.

That's not to say that the fanbase can't grow in the US but I don't see F1 ever getting a "big" hold.
Also Texas is still having winter weather in March so a US GP is not feasible until late spring.
 
Mainstream TV in the USA gets... NASCAR, Indycar, F1, TUSC, MotoGP, Formula E, GRC and AMA Supercross.

That's not nearly close to what other markets get to see.

And how long has it taken to get this stage? I left the USA in 2008. There is a whole "paying" generation my age(43) that remember racing on tv As Indy Car and NASCAR, Moto GP. With ESPN and then speed channel, it added more European/Oceania series from mid/late 90's.
My son was born in '94, so from that generation to now, is a small minority of North American motorsport fans. Not going to be many fans to choose motorsport over Scandal, California Hills or Zack efron or whoever is the celeb of the month.

There need to be a way to watch the racers day in day out. Not just on Sunday. If a reality show had Hamilton and his gf on tv, that might start something. It has to be marketable.
 
- Limited to no local feeder series. NASCAR is the local product, with open-wheelers some distance back from sports-car series (which is a bit more down-to-earth in terms of expenses).

- Terrible TV Times. More than half of America is either asleep or getting ready for church at 8:00-10:00 Eastern Time (even earlier for Central, Mountain, and Pacific time zones), so ratings are always going to be middling. And that's if the races are on The Continent; ratings for a race in Japan or China are very limited to the hardcore fans, unless they're on tape delay.

That said, there's been an uptick in American interest and ratings, but it's probably always going to be a niche sport. Usually folks who take an interest in cars or have a career in the field are much more likely to have exposure and interest in F1, in various degrees, than someone who isn't. Auto racing has a bit of a stigma that "it isn't a sport" so it's discounted a bit in areas with century-old sports franchises. It's also a "rich man's sport", so poorer classes or hard-scrabble areas of the country can't really relate to the problems of a million-dollar vehicle that's a half-second off the pace.

Having a team and sponsors get heavily involved would help, but see my first point. Companies aren't typically going spread themselves that thin; there's always a few American sponsors and that hasn't changed much. It's still a ginormous economic engine, a tremendous population base with a very large middle and upper class, so it's almost always a target for growth. But we're also people with many sporting interests; besides the pro teams (nearly everyone is a fan of at least two pro sports teams), there's usually a college sport that's popular too; also, there's golf, hunting, fishing, tennis, and their kids' sporting activities that might take precedence. At some point, the fan isn't going have much time for another highly-technical pastime, unless they're also a truly dedicated sports fan with limited to no other interests; although in that case, those 7am starts have limited competition on the dial.
 
Last edited:
@Pupik "on the dial", you are giving away your age. I remember the days when sets had dials on them and you actually had to get up off your butt and turn it to change the stations...oh the horrors :D
 
Back