- 4,722
- United Kingdom
That does sound quite hard.at the end of an increasingly long and increasingly hot shaft that you have to pump your cooling fluids through
That does sound quite hard.at the end of an increasingly long and increasingly hot shaft that you have to pump your cooling fluids through
Antarctica 24 hours of sun... not possible with flat earth model.
Can we just make a hole in the ground and see where it comes out?
Yes there maybe some magma to deal with but I am sure we have the technology to handle.
Antarctica 24 hours of sun... not possible with flat earth model.
I would guess it might affect the planet quite a lot too. We still need it to live on.Uh...they do that quite often, deep oil drills can only drill so deep before the material is too difficult to dig through because of temperatures. So the first issue is the drill bit itself is already getting heated from the friction and vibrations of what it is doing, which is moving dirt, rock and material in general out the way. Then as you get deeper the temperature rises and that add on to the working temperature of the drill bit. Now there are materials that can handle high temperatures, but many times those materials lack other properties needed to drill deep into the earth. So what you need is not only a material that has the ability to break through hard materials, but is very feasible in high temp condition, and wont easily fracture or wear.
These aren't easy things, and material engineers have studied ways to dig deeper for various reasons, since there is good money in it. If you can figure it out than so be it, but it's not as simple or close to it as you think.
To dig a hole to the centre of the earth even would require something like a laser, no material we use to dig can possibly do it without melting or destroying it self.
Well, no, because obviously space folds except when it doesn't, except it doesn't really at all it's just an illusion of folding. Simple.
Ok... so then... the stars? They look farther than either the moon or soon from any given point on the disc in that image. They don't get folded?
Ok hang on a sec... if the light from the moon is really light from the sun, then the light from the sun reflected off of the moon reaching you has gone through more folded space than the light coming straight from the sun to you. You should never see the moon unless it's closer to the sun than you are and you can also see the sun (which doesn't ever seem to happen in their graphics).
A small point which is somewhat skipped over in the flat earth fantasy but is the next pseudoscientific revival going to be the sun going around the earth?
After all, it doesn't feel like the earth is travelling 70,000mph and the sun quite clearly is the celestial body which moves across the sky, rather than the other way around. Evidence!
Good series of videos debunking flat earthers whilst teaching you about reality in fairly good depth at the same time.
And a slightly unrelated series debunking geocentrism (Earth being center of the universe) that's also pretty fun to watch and goes into a crazy amount of detail
It's already common practice to cite big numbers related to speed and then go on to claim that because the numbers are big they're fake. It's not just the earth, they know that the Sun is supposed to move within the galaxy and that the galaxy moves in space. Some of these numbers are 5 or more figures, so they can't possibly be real.A small point which is somewhat skipped over in the flat earth fantasy but is the next pseudoscientific revival going to be the sun going around the earth?
After all, it doesn't feel like the earth is travelling 70,000mph and the sun quite clearly is the celestial body which moves across the sky, rather than the other way around. Evidence!
It's already common practice to cite big numbers related to speed and then go on to claim that because the numbers are big they're fake. It's not just the earth, they know that the Sun is supposed to move within the galaxy and that the galaxy moves in space. Some of these numbers are 5 or more figures, so they can't possibly be real.
All of its faked to keep us quiet, after all if you haven't been then it can't be true.
CGI dude!
I would guess it might affect the planet quite a lot too. We still need it to live on.
That happened on a radio quiz once. The question was;
How many times bigger than the moon is the sun, is it twice as big or four times as big?
The actual answer is closer to 400 times bigger so many people think that the researchers read "The sun is 400 times bigger than the moon" and thought it must have been an error. It couldn't possibly be 400 times bigger!
Not only is the Sun 400 times bigger than the moon, it is 400 times farther away - permitting the phenomenon of the full solar eclipse. This coincidence actually irritates some people.The actual answer is closer to 400 times bigger so many people think that the researchers read "The sun is 400 times bigger than the moon" and thought it must have been an error. It couldn't possibly be 400 times bigger!
---
For what it's worth, even the heliocentric model of our solar system isn't "static" or flat. Even as the spherical planets orbit the sun, the entire system itself is moving through space.
I always found this gif fascinating:
Well, no, because obviously space folds except when it doesn't, except it doesn't really at all it's just an illusion of folding. Simple.
I also note from the images of the dome firmament (or space... or whatever it is) that the barrier between the dome and whatever is beyond the dome (which is... whatever they say it is) literally meets Antarctica. So if you were to travel to the South Pole - which, by their images, is the entire circumference of the disc - you wouldn't be able to walk the last foot towards it as your head would be outside the dome. Or it's an impenetrable, physical barrier that you'd just bounce your head off, like the eaves of your house in the attic.
Not that you could reach the South Pole, as it's not an actual place in their images.
What i can't figure out about Flat Earthers is to what end their stubbornness exists for.
I can get religious people arguing for their beliefs and the writings within their scriptures despite overwhelming scientific evidence that contradicts it - Creationists etc, because it challenges the very bedrock of their belief bubble.
But why be so certain that the earth is flat? What benefit does possessing this knowledge enrich mankind and why would a 'ball' earth be such a challenging concept?
The one thing all conspiracy theories have in common is that there is virtually no tangible evidence to support them.
Yeah, seeing space in motion is always interesting. I have not gotten around to getting a telescope yet, but I bought Universe Sandbox 2 a while ago and it can provide some very nice imagery.For what it's worth, even the heliocentric model of our solar system isn't "static" or flat. Even as the spherical planets orbit the sun, the entire system itself is moving through space.
I always found this gif fascinating: