Unsurprisingly I've never heard of NAFTA, being from Europe and all. I simply assumed from looking at maps that it was in Central America.
I'm American and I've heard of the EU and Mercosur.
No doubt because the European Union is mentioned in western media regularly. Meanwhile NAFTA is not! 👍
Really? NAFTA has been talked about quite a bit in U.S. media, Mercosur hasn't, it probably had more to do with how much you care about modern history or global econ., thus dependent on what type of news you watch or read. Anyways me like others are just surprised that people didn't know Mexico was considered NA is all, you're not the only one to make these comments on the web.
Trust me, NAFTA hasn't done much for the U.S.Perhaps NAFTA is mentioned quite a bit in the US which really isn't surprising, as it involves the States heavily after all. But I've never heard it mentioned in the media here in the UK. Ever.
Perhaps NAFTA is mentioned quite a bit in the US which really isn't surprising, as it involves the States heavily after all. But I've never heard it mentioned in the media here in the UK. Ever.
Can we? I'd like to trade Maldonado for Vergne if that's the case.Are we freely trading drivers today?
Remember what Massa was like before he joined Ferrari? He was just like Gutiérrez, and wouldn't have lasted much longer without some help from Maranello.A very uninspiring choice, if true! At least he'll keep it on track - albeit slowly. One wonders if he was forced on Haas by Ferrari as frankly, he wouldn't even have been on my radar.
Remember what Massa was like before he joined Ferrari? He was just like Gutiérrez, and wouldn't have lasted much longer without some help from Maranello.
Fixed that for you. Sauber might have had unprecedented success with Kobayashi and Pérez, but it's easy to forget that they haven't lived up to it since.Gutiérrez's Sauber, on the other hand, wasn't.
Fixed that for you. Sauber might have had unprecedented success with Kobayashi and Pérez, but it's easy to forget that they haven't lived up to it since.
What Ferrari saw in Gutiérrez was his ability to drive around slowly but steadily during the few testing sessions there are now, and collect data, without sticking it in a wall. That's all teams need in a test driver nowadays! Otherwise do you really think Ferrari would have hired an ageing fresh out of HRT De La Rosa several seasons back?Sometimes that happens - Pérez freely admits that he went to McLaren too soon. But I don't think Ferrari would have taken Gutiérrez if they didn't see something in him. If it were any other team, it would be easy to write it off as being a grab for cash, but this is Ferrari we're talking about - if the sport ever wound up in a position where Ferrari needed to take pay driversit would be in dire straits indeed.
What Ferrari saw in Gutiérrez was his ability to drive around slowly but steadily during the few testing sessions there are now, and collect data, without sticking it in a wall.
Really? That good?!I have no figures for this but the impression I got in 2014 was that he was the driver most likely to weave like a mentaller in the braking zones. Veeeery GP2.
I am waiting for the next tweet from Aston whining about the BoP in F1.I can't believe no-one's mentioned this:
There are no teams left, only franchise naming rights.
Who were the under performers in lower formula that became better in F1? I keep seeing that posted but I've yet to see anything backing that claim up.
Michael Schumacher didn't do much in the lower formulae. 1990 German F3 champion against pretty much no one (apart from a couple of latter day touring car drivers like Jorg Muller and Franz Engstler) was his claim to fame. British F3 was the place to be in 1990 as it had Hakkinen, Fittipaldi, Salo, Adrian Fernandez and Alain Menu taking part.Kobayashi.
That's about it.