Am i the only one who thinks the F1 Sprint Races get totally ignored?
I was just browsing through 2025 British GP thread for this weekends GP and someone mentioned, and i'm paraphrasing this as i'm not having a go at them - least of all because it's all very true, how 'Hamilton needs to have a good result, preferably a win, to help his time at Ferrari'. He's not had a great season so far and neither has Ferrari, as a whole. But he did qualify 1st for the Sprint race at China and went on to win it! Yet it might as well of never happened as far as history sees it.
The season's page on Wikipedia barely gives the Sprint Races any mention. F1's own website has a section on Sprint Races and how they fit in with the GP weekends, but you'll struggle to find their results on the 'Results' page. Yes a Sprint win only gives you the same points as a 6th place GP finish, but they're all valuble points the end of the day and they mean a lot to the teams and drivers championships. Yet they're very much a foot note.
I said this when they were first announced, but why didn't they just use the Sprint Races, for the six weekends that run them, as a replacement for Qualifying on the Saturday. With the sprint results providing the grid order for Sunday's GP. They can still give out the same points as they do. It puts less stress on the cars, uses less tyres and gives the team personnel a bit of a breather.
The Sprint only gives points upto 8th (rather than upto 10th in a GP) so Sprint weekends only throw scraps towards the lower teams on the grid for the same amount of effort. It almost creates a two-tier championship where the lower teams have even less chance of a points haul. At least with a short race instead of regular qualifying the lower teams have a better chance of a higher grid position for that weekends GP - due to a higher probability of other cars getting damaged or retiring because of reliability issues that a race provides over the more regimented qualifying session.