The General Anime Thread...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kent
  • 66,840 comments
  • 3,349,680 views
I shouldn't even be here talking to you ungrateful cretins, but I'm bored.

Entertain me. Now.
 
And if you want a shorter version T-12, here's one for 10 minutes.:)
 
My compatibility with Sephy I think is the highest. It once was over 90% at one time.
Anime compatibility with Sephy71 is:
Extremely High
87.7%
 
KrLf7.gif
 
My comparisons are uncharted because I'm too underground for MAL.

Honestly though, many of the lists compiled by users are going to be heavily biased towards the most popular series. Such as Bleach being #2 on one of the lists posted, when its animation, story, and everything are pretty meh most of the time.

Then you have the younger crowds in here that know that and Naruto, etc, but have never watched core classics like Bebop or NGE - specifically the guy that constantly quotes sales numbers and figures as a defense of what is good and isn't. The equivalent of saying Transformers 2 was good because it made money at the box office.
 
My compatibility with everyone else.
Dravonic: 44.2%
Lain: 76.9%
sly: 67.1%
Randy: 54.1%
AOS-: 74.3%
uMadson: Unknown :(
DK: Unknown :(
Loli: 64.4%

With two of the best reviewers on MAL:
Archaeon: 62.3%
tehnominator: 73.4%

Trust me, their reviews are quite good.
http://myanimelist.net/profile/tehnominator/reviews
http://myanimelist.net/profile/Archaeon/reviews
Then you have the younger crowds in here that know that and Naruto, etc, but have never watched core classics like Bebop or NGE - specifically the guy that constantly quotes sales numbers and figures as a defense of what is good and isn't. The equivalent of saying Transformers 2 was good because it made money at the box office.
I never say "X show is selling good, so it's good, and X show is selling bad, so it's bad.".

There have been shows that sold bad I consider to be great, and shows that sold great to not be all that good.

Also you're forgetting that "Good" and "Bad" are subjective when it comes to the quality of shows, something that is common sense. It's all opinions. You can't prove X show is good, and X show is bad as it's subjective, not objective.
 
Last edited:
Also you're forgetting that "Good" and "Bad" are subjective when it comes to the quality of shows, something that is common sense. It's all opinions. You can't prove X show is good, and X show is bad as it's subjective, not objective.

False.

Animation quality has objective elements. A solid sound track can be objectively measured as well, as some anime will just use the same bits over and over and over, while others will have large scores for even just a few episodes, such as Madoka. And there is good and bad voice acting, and I think people will also agree on that.
 
However voice acting, while people say there is good and bad voice acting, that's also subjective. The FMA dub having horrible voice acting is an opinion. The FMA dub having excellent voice acting is an opinion. There are only certain things that are objective like say video quality on a home video release.

The Dragon Ball Z Season Sets look worse than the Dragon Box for example is objective due to the fact that on the Season Sets, 20% of the footage was cropped vertically, you have missing lines (Mainly in heavy shaking scenes.), colors much darker than they originally were, and more problems.
(Season Set shot on the top, Dragon Box on the bottom.)
61Yv4AFsbhL.png
81aZdGKalOL.png
 
Back