The non-muscle American car thread (READ THE OP)

  • Thread starter Thread starter The87Dodge
  • 1,558 comments
  • 148,747 views

In your opinion, which country makes the best looking cars?


  • Total voters
    199
It's TexRex and TS040 you need to tell this to, not me. They started the flamewars and they were the ones who decided to turn a debate into a large arguement. And TS040 should already get warning points for his smartmouth comments like "AHAHAHAHA SHUT UP" and "Oh sorry, dad.".

I'm going to make this very clear: you do not get to tell members of staff how to do their duties. Doubly so when you've repeatedly broken the AUP in this very thread.

This ends now. It's not up for discussion.
 
Double post -_-

I love this car. Panoz GTR-1, while we're at it.

1997-panoz-esperante-gtr-1-road-car-3.jpg

wallpapers_panoz_gtr-1_1997_1.jpg

Here's the Visteon Racing car.
 
I'm not an authority, but to call the Esperante GTR-1 the racing version of the Esperante road car might be a stretch.

autowp.ru_panoz_gtr-1_2.jpg
I'll be honest, I'm not up to par regarding American cars. That's why I asked.
 
Compared to all the other performance cars you could've bought, ultra does apply. It has more horsepower than:

1st generation ford Taurus SHO
Chevrolet Beretta Z34, which was Chevrolet's highest performance car besides the Camaro and Corvette.
Most Mustangs
Most Camaros
BMW M3 E30
Most Audis
Basically all Chevrolet and Ford cars besides the Corvette, Camaro, and Mustang.

Few American cars back in the day performed better than the Spirit R/T.

...no GMC Typhoon and Syclone end of story. And those weren't "ultra", your name clearly proves the issue here.
 
Last edited:
Just curious, what do you mean by "shoebox"?
The term refers, primarily, to Ford cars produced for the '49-54 model years, stemming from their shoebox appearance when viewed from above, an evolution from their fenders-outside-the-bodyshell predecessors. Because of this definition, though, the term is frequently used for non-Ford vehicles that had just undergone the same evolution.

Edit: Here's a '48 Ford for comparison:

1948_Ford_Coupe-jun23a.jpg
 
The term refers, primarily, to Ford cars produced for the '49-54 model years, stemming from their shoebox appearance when viewed from above, an evolution from their fenders-outside-the-bodyshell predecessors. Because of this definition, though, the term is frequently used for non-Ford vehicles that had just undergone the same evolution.

Edit: Here's a '48 Ford for comparison:

1948_Ford_Coupe-jun23a.jpg
Got it now.
 
I only mentioned cars, because of the weight difference.

Earlier on you made the statement that weight doesn't make much difference, but horsepower does. Which one is it? I don't know why you're so abrasive, but you've soured my GTP experience tonight just from being so wrong and then having the audacity to try and hide behind moderators. Man up.
 
This thing was all kinds of ugly...

1999-Packard-Twelve-Concept-12.jpg

And was a disgrace to the Packard name. Thing is, you lower a 53 Packard a few inches or stick a V8 in one...

image.jpg


...and the Packard clubs get all upset. That monstrosity of a concept car however, is considered a good car by those people. Strange.
 
Ah! That's a screenshot from the 1974 movie Gone In 60 Seconds. Go figure, tons of cars wrecked in that movie. Some eligible for posting here!
Well...that's a racing version of a Fox body Mustang...but honest, is this really a muscle car when it looks like a big Escort?

View attachment 520466

No
Just a friendly tip, use the edit button to help avoid double-posting (or try +Quote to reply to multiple posts) :)


How about something a little different:

1954 GMC Pickup2.jpg
1954 International R100 1.JPG
1967 Ford F100 Pickup Truck.JPG
1949-f1-ford-truck-001c.jpg
landscape-1431706163-pickup-trucks-red-chevy-0615.jpg
maxresdefault.jpg
 

Latest Posts

Back