- 3,411

- the bottom of my heart.
- kolio123
So... they should?
I just read that 3 times before I realized what I had typed.
Fixed.
So... they should?
Mine usually tear on the bottom, so I just flip it over. There's a whole other side of the sock left! @Mrs Wolfe doesn't seem to appreciate this efficient use of material, and would rather throw it away.I like having a hole in my sock.
Wearing those jeans that press your butt and legs into shape is just sad.
I wholeheartedly agree with this. Dry or die!I've always enjoyed dry cereal. I think that most of the breakfast cereal-eating world is completely nuts...
Breakfast cereal with milk looks the scrapings of broken garbage disposal, tastes like moist sawdust, smells like damp cardboard; it's also messy and inconvenient.
I've endured your strange morning ritual for decades, and I'm not going to take it anymore!
Not the fall that kills you. Its the impact.You don't have a fear of flying. You have a fear of crashing.
You don't have a fear of heights. You have a fear of falling.
Then you're a masochist.What if it's Weetabix?
"LEGOs" is a valid term to use when talking about the bricks.![]()
I'm well aware of LEGO's statement on the matter, however it is still my opinion that "LEGOs" sounds appropriate.It's not, Lego have made public statements to correct this. "Lego" is a plural and the bricks are "Lego bricks". Ex. "Watch your step, there is Lego all over the floor!"
I would normally argue an opinion but your statement is factually untrue.![]()
This. Purely for the gaming power.I hate laptops. The good old-fashioned desktop is SOOOOO much better.
I was just talking about the hole you need to put your foot in.Mine usually tear on the bottom, so I just flip it over. There's a whole other side of the sock left! @Mrs Wolfe doesn't seem to appreciate this efficient use of material, and would rather throw it away.![]()
This. Only if if my friends genuinely understood. At least they don't dog me on it too much. They are still good friends.I've never been drunk and don't feel the need to ever experience that.
And so many people say that like being drunk. Headaches, puking, dizzy. I hate every one of those things. Why would I want them all at once? Sounds pretty 🤬 up to me. I think they are all lying.I hate being drunk.
I've only drank to the point of being drunk on a few occasions and I can't say I enjoyed them. It's not even that I do stupid stuff I just genuinely hate the way it feels to be drunk.
No.In recent years, Justin Bieber music is good, guys.
Would that be addiction though? If you enjoy it and it's not harming you, why not do it everyday? Why stop to prove you can, just to prove you can?Funniest part is that they claim they are not addicted, but they do it everyday even though they say don't need to.
Yes, they are being mentally dependent on a substance.Would that be addiction though?
It is illegal, and changes your priorities in a negative way.If you enjoy it and it's not harming you, why not do it everyday?
To prove to yourself that you do not need it.Why stop to prove you can, just to prove you can?
And so many people say that like being drunk. Headaches, puking, dizzy. I hate every one of those things. Why would I want them all at once? Sounds pretty 🤬 up to me. I think they are all lying.
That's different than just using it everyday isn't it?Yes, they are being mentally dependent on a substance.
The illegal bit varies by location, which calls into question if it makes sense in the first place. If the use is having a negative effect, then clearly there is a negative effect. However daily usage was the only thing you mentioned originally, and that's what I was questioning. Using something often doesn't constitute addiction or harm.It is illegal, and changes your priorities in a negative way.
That doesn't sound worthwhile in normal circumstances. I could try to live without my favorite possessions, but there isn't exactly a lot of motivation to do so because proving that I was capable of doing it seems completely pointless.To prove to yourself that you do not need it.
How so? Edit: answered my own question below; increases likelihood of addiction.That's different than just using it everyday isn't it?
The part you quoted never mentioned negative effects, that's usually more the withdrawal of said substance, but a shifting of priorities so that everything in your life becomes weed related. "Man I got so high and listened to this album/watched this movie/did whatever and it was sooooooo trippy" is the best example I can give.If the use is having a negative effect, then clearly there is a negative effect.
But it does vastly increase the likelihood of addiction, does it not?However daily usage was the only thing you mentioned originally, and that's what I was questioning. Using something often doesn't constitute addiction or harm.
Drugs carry a stigma, frequent usage even more so. The act of doing without drugs for X amount of time is usually a sign of them trying to break said stigma, and prove to whoever (be it themselves or loved-ones) that they aren't an addict.That doesn't sound worthwhile in normal circumstances. I could try to live without my favorite possessions, but there isn't exactly a lot of motivation to do so because proving that I was capable of doing it seems completely pointless.
To clarify my earlier post, I was debating whether everyday use must imply dependence. It's absolutely a risk factor and something to consider, but it won't immediately create problems. At the very least, the amount of time that everyday use continues will play a factor.How so? Edit: answered my own question below; increases likelihood of addiction.
The part you quoted never mentioned negative effects,
that's usually more the withdrawal of said substance, but a shifting of priorities so that everything in your life becomes weed related. "Man I got so high and listened to this album/watched this movie/did whatever and it was sooooooo trippy" is the best example I can give.
But it does vastly increase the likelihood of addiction, does it not?
Drugs carry a stigma, frequent usage even more so. The act of doing without drugs for X amount of time is usually a sign of them trying to break said stigma, and prove to whoever (be it themselves or loved-ones) that they aren't an addict.