- 12,883

- Divided States of America
- MikuHime80
Better?remove ;-;
Better?remove ;-;
Ohh Shots Fired! Feel free to look at this picture at any time. http://media.salon.com/2013/05/shutterstock_137498786.jpgFeel free to stop being an asshole at any time
And feel free to take you and your friend Jack and just leave me alone.Ohh Shots Fired! Feel free to look at this picture at any time. http://media.salon.com/2013/05/shutterstock_137498786.jpg
I can understand the underlying meanings to it, but it isn't helping make anything better. I let it go a little because everyone's doing what I usually do by calling it how they see it. Now it's a lovely salt bath.I don't understand what you're getting out of attacking anyone for no reason.
Pleasure, because they think they're better than someone over the internet, it's childish and Immature.I don't understand what you're getting out of attacking anyone.
Well, it is my philosophy that there should always be more slower-class cars than faster ones. To my knowledge there are about 4-5 GT500 drivers and 7-9 GT300s. I think that this ratio is pretty close to the real-life series but I'd say having one more GT500 wouldn't hurt. (As long as they start with some ballast and aren't insanely fast. If that's the case they need to find a more "elite" series if I'm honest. /opinion)4) More experienced drivers needed!--GT300 is definitely doing it's job of being a class for those needing experience or those that can't handle the GT500s. Problem lies where we have a hell load of GT300 drivers and a handful of GT500 drivers. I'm not big on asking for things, it's a bit of embarrassment factor for me mentally, but if you guys know of people that would be competent and semi-interested, please invite them. Having drivers that know what they are doing is very important.
They would start with ballast. We're a third into the season. I definitely get the proportion, but we had 4:7 ratio, which made it look very empty. 6:9 ratio would probably be ideal for S3.Well, it is my philosophy that there should always be more slower-class cars than faster ones. To my knowledge there are about 4-5 GT500 drivers and 7-9 GT300s. I think that this ratio is pretty close to the real-life series but I'd say having one more GT500 wouldn't hurt. (As long as they start with some ballast and aren't insanely fast. If that's the case they need to find a more "elite" series if I'm honest. /opinion)
To have 9+ cars on GT6 in a online series that is seen as subpar at best, I absolutely do appreciate it. But there needs to be a tide turn for quality too. Just having one or two more GT500 drivers would be phenomenal.4:7 (57.14%) and 6:9 (66.7%) are pretty similar ratios. The only real difference to me is that 6:9 makes it a full grid. Hopefully you'll be able to achieve that at some point, but I believe we have a healthy grid as it is. You're doing something right to have 9+ cars every race, take some solace in that. 👍
The races are Saturday afternoon.I would drive a GT500 just for the sake of attendence, but i work Saturday nights up until labour day. Maybe after then.
I work 10-7The races are Saturday afternoon.
I'm more focused on next season. If the numbers from Apricot Hill can be consistent, we can ride out the rest of the season.I would drive a GT500 just for the sake of attendence, but i work Saturday nights up until labour day. Maybe after then.
#96: GTP_GT916--Causing an avoidable collision--Pit lane start for next applicable event.
Causing and avoidable collision--10 kg. of ballast for the next applicable race for each car that a driver hit during the race.
There's a reason behind it. Had it have been between drivers of the same class, the standard penalty would apply. However, it wasn't, which to me made it a more severe collision.