I was wondering the same thing. Maybe they automatically swing from side to side rather than the manual action of moving them to point one way or the other?
One clever, but rare, touch is the swinging air vents on my old 626. It's something which I've never seen anywhere else.
![]()
(sucky pic, but it's the best I could find on short notice)
This is also why we haven't seen a GM police car in ages.
Police often cruise at night in "stealth" mode, with out lights.
If you can't turn out the headlights, you can't be "stealthy".
Thanks for the explanations on the air vents. I get it now![]()
It seems that on all single bulbs that have low and high filament in them that only one beam is lit up at a time. I'm not sure about our G6, because the beams are separate, but my Civic's lows turn off when the highs are on.And while we are on GM, what is the deal with the high beams on GM cars?
GM is the only manufacturer I know of that has the low beams turn off when the high-beams turn on.
It is a feature I find very annoying on all my GM vehicles. Consequently, if I'm going someplace that is likely to be DARK, dark in the evening I will take ANY of the other cars over the GM's because I like having the extra lumens provided by having the high beams ADDED to the lowbeams, rather than INSTEAD of the lowbeams.
It seems that on all single bulbs that have low and high filament in them that only one beam is lit up at a time. I'm not sure about our G6, because the beams are separate, but my Civic's lows turn off when the highs are on.
Layout of the engine alone doesn't determine this, rather the use of collapsible engine mounts and guide rails ensure the engine on most modern cars head under the chassis in an accident.I heard somewhere that Audi used that layout so the engine could dive under the chassis if crash occurs.
In contrast, my mate's E46 3-er very obviously turns the lows off when he puts the highs on.
Which is however not as daft as the placement for the Cassette player on the Citroen CX...
I'm surprised Abarth hasn't been mentioned in this thread.![]()
Now onto one that drives me mad (and the reason I will never buy a Saab)
![]()
First its a stupid place to put the ignition key, and the the requirement to put the damn car in reverse before you can get the key out. I know it has logic for Scandinavian countries (allows the car to be parked in gear rather than using the handbrake) but its still drives me potty.
What about Abarth?
And despite the 40 year gap, I bet the Kaiser's doors worked just as well.The Kaiser-Frazier also had weird doors, and came before the Z1!
![]()
center handbrake: they were designed BEFORE everybody was thinking center consoles. oh, and over here, it's considered a "Parking brake", and is only supposed to be used for such...which is why it usually gets transfered to a pedal on the extreme left side on most american vehicles.
Some of the cars he talks about on Top Gear should name but a couple I suppose.![]()
Now onto one that drives me mad (and the reason I will never buy a Saab)
![]()
First its a stupid place to put the ignition key, and the the requirement to put the damn car in reverse before you can get the key out. I know it has logic for Scandinavian countries (allows the car to be parked in gear rather than using the handbrake) but its still drives me potty.
foot-activated parking/ e-brake is a stupid invention in a first place.
Permission to think granted. it could easily be integrated into the dash.
Permission to think granted. it could easily be integrated into the dash.
It COULD, yes, but you do realize how cheap a metal lever, a pivot point, a ratcheting/locking mechanism and a little rubber pad is don't you? It's the obvious choice imo.
Like those funny Honda's with the shifter integrated into the dash?
Not when you have a reason to try and keep everything off the floor of the car, i.e when you design the car to seat 3-wide somewhat comfortably up front. Where else are you going to put the handbrake?
I don't see anything special in here,as i also can't see anything Abarth in the new 500,it's just not it.
Abarth main focus was race cars,so i actually don't see the problem with engine lid on the 600,and Recaro had various types of head rests.
foot-activated parking/ e-brake is a stupid invention in a first place.