GilesGuthrie
Staff Emeritus
- 11,038
- Edinburgh, UK
- CMDRTheDarkLord
Also, typically, "tactical" nukes are of the neutron type which have high personal casualty rates with relatively low asset damage.
Because they both believe that the land is theirs and that they should not share it because that would be conceding.Originally posted by km
i think it is stupid that india and pakistan are fighting for a peace of land why don't they just split it 50 50 don't that sound better than nuking each other![]()
Originally posted by boombexus
A tactical nuke is one that has a smaller blast radius and can be used, say, against troop concentrations or other specific battlefield targets. They can be laucnhed by artillary or aircraft.
All the other "non-tactical" are high yield devices usually straped to a ICBM or Inter Continental Ballistic Missile and are targeted at the enemy's major cities.
Originally posted by streetracer780
Who gives a **** about the Middle East. There a bunch of people who can't agree on anything.
Originally posted by km
K SMART GUY LET ME LAUNCH A NUKE AT U AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS TO U![]()
Originally posted by ethanol
sst:<whisper> Umm... Don't tell any of the others, but we don't have any nukes in Canada... </whisper>
sst:
Originally posted by km
K SMART GUY LET ME LAUNCH A NUKE AT U AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS TO U![]()
Originally posted by km
would anybody know what would happen if india and pakistan launched nukes at each other would everyone else ie: USA, Russia launch theres![]()
Originally posted by Rice Rocketeer
wow...this is a stupid thread...
anyone ever hear of Mutually Assured Destruction?
Originally posted by ethanol
sst:<whisper> Umm... Don't tell any of the others, but we don't have any nukes in Canada... </whisper>
sst:
Originally posted by rufrgt_sn00pie2001
Oh right, and Holland doesn't have guns.![]()