What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,275 comments
  • 562,381 views
I'm still gonna watch it. Sucker of bad horror and Sci Fi, I am. :lol:

I know what you mean, I actually went to watch AVP:R knowing it was going to be bad. Turned out to be worse than I ever imagined :lol:
 
100% of a6m5 logic says go see it now. Good thing I'm lazy and cheap, but if the movie makes it to the cheap theater, look out! :lol:
If you are not sure just wait and rent 2012. I wouldnt say its worth seeing in the theater. Just wait for the cheap theater.
 
Saw Taken and Gran Torino over the weekend.

Best Saturday night I've had in about several months. I was thinking about writing a review, possibly for both.

Taken kicked so much ass, and I don't care whether or not it was a "squash" thriller.
 
👍 I just got "Taken" on Blu-ray, but haven't watched it yet - I was actually trying to remember how it made it's way on to my rental queue, but I'm quite looking forward to it now. I also got "Hunger", which scored a great review from Tom Servo a few weeks ago.

As for my viewing:

men-who-stare-at-goats-One_Sheet_rgb_1254171050_640w.jpg


The Men Who Stare At Goats (2009)

I don't want to be too harsh, as it was a 'fun' film, and the stellar cast gave it a good shot, but... I think the best thing I can say about it was that it was light-hearted, chucklesome, and on the odd occasion, quite interesting...

As for the downsides, however - well, making a feature-length film based on a Jon Ronson documentary was always going to be a tough gig. The humour is hardly cutting edge, and the plot is practically non-existent. The film really doesn't even have a take home message to speak of either, and as such it is almost instantly forgettable. 3/10
 
Taken is indeed an excellent movie.

The commercial for The Men who stare at goats looked abolutley horrible. Nothing I would ever watch. :sick: No offense.
 
👍 I just got "Taken" on Blu-ray, but haven't watched it yet - I was actually trying to remember how it made it's way on to my rental queue, but I'm quite looking forward to it now. I also got "Hunger", which scored a great review from Tom Servo a few weeks ago.

As for my viewing:

men-who-stare-at-goats-One_Sheet_rgb_1254171050_640w.jpg


The Men Who Stare At Goats (2009)

I don't want to be too harsh, as it was a 'fun' film, and the stellar cast gave it a good shot, but... I think the best thing I can say about it was that it was light-hearted, chucklesome, and on the odd occasion, quite interesting...

As for the downsides, however - well, making a feature-length film based on a Jon Ronson documentary was always going to be a tough gig. The humour is hardly cutting edge, and the plot is practically non-existent. The film really doesn't even have a take home message to speak of either, and as such it is almost instantly forgettable. 3/10

Man, and I liked the commercial too. I'm a comedy nut...but it doesn't sound too good. :guilty:
 
This is a very short (9min 11sec) and funny video. I hope it isn't against the policy.

EDIT: Sorry, but this video is not appropriate.

Mr. Moderator! Have you even watched that video? I think you havent. If you watched it then I would say: You are not your D... LOL
 
Last edited:
star-trek-2009.jpg


Star Trek 👍👍

I've watched an awful lot of Star Trek in my life. I've seen all of the movies, every episode of the original and TNG, as well as most of DS9, Voyager, and even Enterprise. So I'm slightly invested in the series.

Yup, they broke with series canon in both explained and unexplained ways - but it certainly isn't the first time we've seen that. They also came up with some hokey pseudo-physics that formed the basis for the movie - but it's not the first time we've seen that either. I certainly didn't need either of those things, but I can't say I wasn't ready for them, or that I wasn't ready to overlook them.

I wasn't ready to see elements of Galaxy Quest reflected in the new movie. That one caught me off guard - but after thinking about it a bit I actually kinda like it. It's a little tip-of-the-hat to an excellent parody of the Star Trek universe and cult.

Overall the movie hits every note it needs to hit. A strong, developing, emotional storyline with some genuinely interesting characters set in front of a fantastic backdrop. I was pretty impressed by the writing and execution throughout the movie. Very little seemed out of place or unwelcome.

It doesn't replace anything that's gone before it. The TNG crew had a different dynamic altogether which was fun to watch for different reasons. Likewise the DS9 crew had yet another dynamic. Each one seems to fit the situation and I think they all work. That being said, and I want to reserve judgement until a second viewing, but this may be the best Star Trek Movie ever made. It's certainly among the top 3 (the other two being 2 and 6). I'm not convinced yet that it's better than Wrath of Khan (which was in my top 10 of all time at one point), but it's close, and I want another viewing to try to make that determination.

Way recommended.
 
star-trek-2009.jpg


Star Trek 👍👍

I've watched an awful lot of Star Trek in my life. I've seen all of the movies, every episode of the original and TNG, as well as most of DS9, Voyager, and even Enterprise. So I'm slightly invested in the series.

Yup, they broke with series canon in both explained and unexplained ways - but it certainly isn't the first time we've seen that. They also came up with some hokey pseudo-physics that formed the basis for the movie - but it's not the first time we've seen that either. I certainly didn't need either of those things, but I can't say I wasn't ready for them, or that I wasn't ready to overlook them.

I wasn't ready to see elements of Galaxy Quest reflected in the new movie. That one caught me off guard - but after thinking about it a bit I actually kinda like it. It's a little tip-of-the-hat to an excellent parody of the Star Trek universe and cult.

Overall the movie hits every note it needs to hit. A strong, developing, emotional storyline with some genuinely interesting characters set in front of a fantastic backdrop. I was pretty impressed by the writing and execution throughout the movie. Very little seemed out of place or unwelcome.

It doesn't replace anything that's gone before it. The TNG crew had a different dynamic altogether which was fun to watch for different reasons. Likewise the DS9 crew had yet another dynamic. Each one seems to fit the situation and I think they all work. That being said, and I want to reserve judgement until a second viewing, but this may be the best Star Trek Movie ever made. It's certainly among the top 3 (the other two being 2 and 6). I'm not convinced yet that it's better than Wrath of Khan (which was in my top 10 of all time at one point), but it's close, and I want another viewing to try to make that determination.

Way recommended.

Yes, yes, yes and yes.

Too bad I only saw it once in the theater. Oh well, time to pick up that Blu-ray copy!

Simon Pegg was brilliant as Scotty. They could not have found anyone better.
 
star-trek-2009.jpg


Star Trek 👍👍

I've watched an awful lot of Star Trek in my life. I've seen all of the movies, every episode of the original and TNG, as well as most of DS9, Voyager, and even Enterprise. So I'm slightly invested in the series.

Yup, they broke with series canon in both explained and unexplained ways - but it certainly isn't the first time we've seen that. They also came up with some hokey pseudo-physics that formed the basis for the movie - but it's not the first time we've seen that either. I certainly didn't need either of those things, but I can't say I wasn't ready for them, or that I wasn't ready to overlook them.

I wasn't ready to see elements of Galaxy Quest reflected in the new movie. That one caught me off guard - but after thinking about it a bit I actually kinda like it. It's a little tip-of-the-hat to an excellent parody of the Star Trek universe and cult.

Overall the movie hits every note it needs to hit. A strong, developing, emotional storyline with some genuinely interesting characters set in front of a fantastic backdrop. I was pretty impressed by the writing and execution throughout the movie. Very little seemed out of place or unwelcome.

It doesn't replace anything that's gone before it. The TNG crew had a different dynamic altogether which was fun to watch for different reasons. Likewise the DS9 crew had yet another dynamic. Each one seems to fit the situation and I think they all work. That being said, and I want to reserve judgement until a second viewing, but this may be the best Star Trek Movie ever made. It's certainly among the top 3 (the other two being 2 and 6). I'm not convinced yet that it's better than Wrath of Khan (which was in my top 10 of all time at one point), but it's close, and I want another viewing to try to make that determination.

Way recommended.

You pick up SO much more the second time you watch it. I've seen it 3 times, and each time it has been a treat. Killer soundtrack too.👍
 
It's certainly among the top 3 (the other two being 2 and 6). I'm not convinced yet that it's better than Wrath of Khan (which was in my top 10 of all time at one point), but it's close, and I want another viewing to try to make that determination.
I see we are of similar minds when it comes to Star Trek. It is a very close call for me on whether it or 6 are better though. There is a lot to be said for attacking your enemy while cloaked and taunting them with Shakespeare.

I bought this one on Blu-Ray and love it (Now I just need the TNG movies to complete my Star Trek BD collection). My biggest wish (without bringing in geeky physics) is that the deleted scenes, which show what Nero did for 25 years, would have been kept or added into a director's cut. I figure it is doubtful since the CGI bits were still incomplete on the Blu-Ray.

Also, needed more Scotty.

Bonus for the Blu-Ray is that BD-Live connects you straight to a Nasa News RSS Feed. 👍
 
I'm a big fan of 2 and 6 too. I enjoyed Star trek a lot but after watching 6 again on Blu-ray recently I have to admit I prefered 6 to 10
 
725
I'm a big fan of 2 and 6 too. I enjoyed Star trek a lot but after watching 6 again on Blu-ray recently I have to admit I prefered 6 to 10
Generations - 7
First Contact - 8
Insurrection - 9
Nemesis - 10

To clarify, when you say 10 you mean what people are calling Star Trek X (this new one) not Nemesis, correct?
 
Generations - 7
First Contact - 8
Insurrection - 9
Nemesis - 10

To clarify, when you say 10 you mean what people are calling Star Trek X (this new one) not Nemesis, correct?

Yes apologies, I meant the new one 👍
 
I see we are of similar minds when it comes to Star Trek. It is a very close call for me on whether it or 6 are better though. There is a lot to be said for attacking your enemy while cloaked and taunting them with Shakespeare.

"From hell's heart I stab at thee"

vs.

"Once more unto the breech dear friends"

vs.

" Are you out of your Fulcan mind?"

Hmmm.... 2 and 6 are a bit more refined. But 2009 has a raw quality that appeals. All three have gigantic plot holes, so that's no help. More research definitely needed.
 
I really enjoyed the movie as well. Right up there with 2. The only problem I have with the movie was how fast the Enterprise could go. Warp 4!:confused:
The NX 01 Enterprise was the 1st warp 5 Earth ship. What happened. Budget cuts?:boggled:
 
The Men Who Stare At Goats (2009)

I don't want to be too harsh, as it was a 'fun' film, and the stellar cast gave it a good shot, but... I think the best thing I can say about it was that it was light-hearted, chucklesome, and on the odd occasion, quite interesting...

...The film really doesn't even have a take home message to speak of either, and as such it is almost instantly forgettable. 3/10

Moral: Don't fly a 'copter while on acid.

Yeah, I found it my-kind-of funny and up-my-alley weird; yet, as you said...surprisingly rather forgettable. (I didn't feel like taking in a serious movie this year.)

Verdict: Rental — possibly best when taking the day from work because you're not-quite-sick, but unsure if you want to chance a long day of work while popping cough drops and carrying extra facial tissues.
 
72423803.jpg

Los Abrazos Rotos (a.k.a. Broken Embraces) (Pedro Almodóvar, 2009) -- Almodóvar's new movie is very much unlike his previous ones. There's no transvestites, no prostitution and very little flaming homosexuals. Still, while none of those get in the way of the story, there is little to no story to begin with. Goes on to being sort of a romantic drama and it works well as such for a while. There's even an element of mystery to it that works nicely as well. But the mvoie falls short of being in any way conclusive and that's a majour flaw, which earns it a 5.5/10 from me.

@Shintaro: Penélope Cruz shows her breasts in this one!
 
👍 I just got "Taken" on Blu-ray, but haven't watched it yet
Don't get your hopes up too high though. It was a very good rental, Neeson is badass, but it's no classic. I found it to be an very good action 'flick'.

P.S. Sorry to hear about the "goats". I was looking forward to that one!

72423803.jpg

Los Abrazos Rotos (a.k.a. Broken Embraces) (Pedro Almodóvar, 2009) -- Almodóvar's new movie is very much unlike his previous ones. There's no transvestites, no prostitution and very little flaming homosexuals. Still, while none of those get in the way of the story, there is little to no story to begin with. Goes on to being sort of a romantic drama and it works well as such for a while. There's even an element of mystery to it that works nicely as well. But the mvoie falls short of being in any way conclusive and that's a majour flaw, which earns it a 5.5/10 from me.

@Shintaro: Penélope Cruz shows her breasts in this one!
Since I'm a fan of both Almodovar & Cruz, I was following your review very seriously. That made the last comment even more comical. :lol:

I love Almodovar's films, and I consider him a master filmmaker. Even if it's a "5.5", I'm betting I'll find plenty of redeeming qualities in this one for me. And I won't be missing guys making out. :lol:
 
I really enjoyed the movie as well. Right up there with 2. The only problem I have with the movie was how fast the Enterprise could go. Warp 4!:confused:
The NX 01 Enterprise was the 1st warp 5 Earth ship. What happened. Budget cuts?:boggled:
Ship physics are something the new movie greatly ignored. I just told myself that the ship wasn't completely ready yet due to the emergency, and the Enterprise wasn't even allowed its test flight, so it just wasn't up to full spec. And as past films have shown us, when the ship is forced to leave early nothing works right.

The truth is more likely that the writers said: Time travel = alternate universe = we can change whatever we want. These are the same guys that wrote both Transformers films. Science and continuity isn't their strong point.
 
The truth is more likely that the writers said: Time travel = alternate universe = we can change whatever we want. These are the same guys that wrote both Transformers films. Science and continuity isn't their strong point.
I see now. I didn't know the same guys wrote those 3 movies but it seemed like such a glaring mistake. Sort of like in Transformers 2 when they are in the Smithsonian museum in DC and walk out the back and they are in a desert plane graveyard. Where is that in DC.:odd::rolleyes:
 
Sort of like in Transformers 2 when they are in the Smithsonian museum in DC and walk out the back and they are in a desert plane graveyard. Where is that in DC.:odd::rolleyes:

I noticed that one right away as well because Ive been to those graveyards and they are in Arizona somewhere if I remember correctly... Was there when I was like 10 or 11 with the parental units... :D So youre right... DC and Arizona are a few 1000 miles apart... Sometimes I wondered if there are more people that see that kind of stuff... I guess Im not alone :p
 


The Taking Of Pelham 123 (Tony Scott, 2009) -- Take the bus. 1.5/10
 
Last edited:
So... Has no one seen Boondock Saints II? It has not and will not be at any theaters around me. Guess just have to wait for it to go on sale. Just wondering...
 
Memento - has Christopher Nolan ever made a bad film? Even if you have to pay a lot of attention because the story starts at the end and ends at the mid-point, it's still brilliantly told. I've always liked films where you have to make up your mind about what happened, provided they're well-made, and Memento is one of the finest. A+

Public Enemies - Heat is one of my favourite films, and at first glance, this is very similar, except that it's based on actual events. But Mann's direction is terrible, with a floating camera that makes you all too conscious that you're watching a film as it bobs around. The films also seems to require that you know the subject going in; I know who the likes of John Dillinger and J. Edgar Hoover were, but I don't know of Pretty Boy Floyd or Frank Nitti. C+

Terminator Salvation - having read what the original script planned for, I'm disappointed by the end result. Many of the plot "twists" are predictable as none of them are very original, and there are plot holes big enough to drive a submarine through. The film is certainly better than the crap that was Rise of the Machines, but it's nowhere near as good as the original films. B-

Wanted - fun, if flawed action romper. The film takes its over-the-top nature and plays it as a stength. I've never been a fan of Angelina Jolie, though; her breasts always seem to be cast with the rest of her being a necessary evil. I can picture the director - I can't spell his name - constantly shouting "Do it again, but this time, do it bigger!", but unlike Michael Bay, he seems to remember where the scene started before he started pushng for more insanity, so the film doesn't feel bloated. As a result, the scenes tend to build up to a climax insead of hitting it straight away and trying to hold on to it for the rest of the sequence. B
 
I saw about 20 minutes of Epic Movie last night. The "... Movie" films are all awful in varying degrees, but this one was a special kind of horiffically bad. If I'd spend those twenty minutes having my manhood sanded down with an industrial belt sander it would have been arguably less painful than watching the film.

They're supposed to be funny, but their parodies of other films made me cringe in the extreme - the humour is dumbed down to such a degree and joined so roughly to the main "story" that it just feels like a series of shorts you'd find on Youtube made by college kids with no future. What happened to the clever parodies you used to get in Films like Hot Shots? Even the first Scary Movie was better and that was a pretty bad film.

0/10 is being kind.

The films also seems to require that you know the subject going in; I know who the likes of John Dillinger and J. Edgar Hoover were, but I don't know of Pretty Boy Floyd or Frank Nitti. C+

Without wishing to offend in any way... well duh. It would cease to be a film based on real events unless it included the real people what were around Dillinger at that time. I'd argue that you don't have to know who Pretty Boy Floyd and the like are in order to enjoy the film - before I watched it I had only cursory knowledge of the robberies and characters involved. The film entertained me, informed me a little, and after I'd seen it I went away and looked into it more.
 
I saw about 20 minutes of Epic Movie last night. The "... Movie" films are all awful in varying degrees, but this one was a special kind of horiffically bad. If I'd spend those twenty minutes having my manhood sanded down with an industrial belt sander it would have been arguably less painful than watching the film.

They're supposed to be funny, but their parodies of other films made me cringe in the extreme - the humour is dumbed down to such a degree and joined so roughly to the main "story" that it just feels like a series of shorts you'd find on Youtube made by college kids with no future. What happened to the clever parodies you used to get in Films like Hot Shots? Even the first Scary Movie was better and that was a pretty bad film.

0/10 is being kind.
I actually went on a date to see this when it was in the cinema, she was hungover, I was trying to punch above my weight. It was quite possibly the worst first date I have ever been on, the only way I managed to get a second date is because we could both agree how horrendously bad that movie was.
 


Serpico (Sidney Lumet, 1973) -- The true story about an honest New York cop who blew the whistle on rampant corruption in the force only to have his comrades turn against him. Forget Scent of a Woman and even The Godfather, this is Al Pacino's best performance ever. The story is good and tense enough to keep you glued to the seat, even if it's a 70s American movie with very long scenes and some seemingly pointless ones, but it's also from a time when movies had a decent amount of their runtime dedicated to characters definition, rather than newer movies that just jump straight into the story. This is also a movie that I've heard has been part of the syllabus in many ethics and law classes and it shows. Great example of the old 'do the right thing' motto, even though it's going against the flow. 9/10
 
Back