Whats The Point Of The BMW X3?

Originally posted by neon_duke
What does New York have to do with anything? You live on Manhattan, not the damn Catskills. Then there might be an excuse. Why won't a minivan work there? Are they not cool enough?


Your sexy little minivans are complete boats. A Grand Caravan is 200.6 inches long. Try parking that in New York City. Most garages on Manhattan won't park long-wheelbase minivans because they have to pack cars into small spaces - that doesn't include the garage at my house or at work, though. Still, I'd eat off my face before I got anything over 185 inches long. An X3, Forester, or Outback is perfect.

What I really want - and I've been pondering this for weeks now - is a car the size of a Mazda 6 with the features of an LS430 - I'd have one in two seconds, no matter what it cost.

And besides, you can get a Grand Caravan Sport AWD in the $30 large USD range, with a 3.8l V6 and enough sauce to tow a 3500-lb racecar/trailer, and a cavernous interior.

Harsh. For $32000, you can get a Caravan SXT AWD (Sport was cancelled), and that's the base Caravan with AWD. It's a load of ****. An AWD Durango seats seven with similar spec/options and a much larger engine for just $28700 - and it's not even the segment's best buy; I'm only using it as an example because it's on the same page. And to make things even worse, Chrysler is the last mainstream minivan maker offering AWD, and they've cut it down to a single trim level on each model. It's looking bleak, Duke.

If I was looking in that range I would most assuredly be looking at a wagon rather than an SUV.

Change 'wagon' to 'Outback' and you're closer - it's the only AWD wagon for sale anymore. How weak is that? (yes, Volvo and Audi have them, but they're no competitor for small SUVs and hardly a competitor for midsize SUVs)

What about non-AWD vehicles? Are there any credible wagons in the same sort of size as the V70/A6? Or (going smaller) the 3-Series?

The Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable have wagons, but they're **** and everybody realises that; something like 80% of their sales are in rental fleets. We've got a few small hatches, but they're all the length of a PT Cruiser and nowhere near the height. A couple offer AWD, but it's rare to actually find them with it. We've of course got the 'low on utility high on style' luxury wagons like everybody - A4, 3-series, V40, IS300 - but they sell so weakly that Jaguar isn't even bringing the X-Type wagon to the US, which seemed like an obvious move. We've also got the standard A6, 5-series, E-class crop, but they're nearly as rare as the small ones.

SUVs have everything wagons have and a bit more utility. What the hell is so wrong with that?

Did you get to have a go in a Zafira when you were in the UK? Or the woeful Xsara Picasso?

No, neither. :(
 
Originally posted by GilesGuthrie
Looking at the high-spec V6 market.
Hyundai Santa Fe V6 2.7 (168bhp) CDX 5d: £17,995
Suzuki Grand Vitara V6 2.7 (170bhp) XL-7 5d: £18,000
Jeep Cherokee V6 3.7 (208bhp) Limited 5d: £23,000
Land Rover Freelander V6 2.5 (174bhp) Premium 5d: £26,595

Just some more-
Kia Sorento 3.5 V6 180hp CDRi £22,000
Honda HRV 1.6 VTEC £14,750
Toyota Rav4 Range £16,000-£20,000
Nissan X-Trail (It is a soft roader. Nissan said so:p) 2.0 £16,755
Daihatsu Terios 1.3 "sport" £10,000
Jeep Wrangler 4.0 £15,755
Kia Sportage 2.0XSE £12,995
Land Rover Discovery TD5 2.5 £21,995
Lexus RX300 V6 £30,000
Mazda Tribute 2.0GXi(2wd) £16,000
Rover Streetwise (Rover call in an "urban soft-roader". Go figure)
1.4 3dr £9,295
Ssangyongyongyingyengwhatever Rexton 2.9RX £18,000
Suzuki Jimny 1.3JLX £9,935
Tata Safari 2.0td £13,995
VW Toureg 2.5TDi £28,600


And I would put the Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin in there, but Mitsu say it is a proper 4x4.
Plus I like it.
 
Originally posted by Rossell
Isuzu VehiCross.















I rest my case.

I like it. You have to admit, it does look stunning, for a 4X4 compared to the other out there.
181270_3_full.jpg


00vehicross.jpg
 
Originally posted by ultrabeat
Just some more-
Kia Sorento 3.5 V6 180hp CDRi £22,000
Honda HRV 1.6 VTEC £14,750
Toyota Rav4 Range £16,000-£20,000
Nissan X-Trail (It is a soft roader. Nissan said so:p) 2.0 £16,755
Daihatsu Terios 1.3 "sport" £10,000
Jeep Wrangler 4.0 £15,755
Kia Sportage 2.0XSE £12,995
Land Rover Discovery TD5 2.5 £21,995
Lexus RX300 V6 £30,000
Mazda Tribute 2.0GXi(2wd) £16,000
Rover Streetwise (Rover call in an "urban soft-roader". Go figure)
1.4 3dr £9,295
Ssangyongyongyingyengwhatever Rexton 2.9RX £18,000
Suzuki Jimny 1.3JLX £9,935
Tata Safari 2.0td £13,995
VW Toureg 2.5TDi £28,600

Yeah. Except he was looking for small SUVs with six-cylinder engines, not four-cylinder or midsize SUVs.


:rolleyes:

We need to get you to understand demographics.
 
I graduated with a guy who owned the yellow version (the only other color you could get). It was a bit freaky to see driving down the road.
 
Thats not a bad idea!💡

A convertable 4x4...
What about a Convertable MPV! Is there a market for that?
 
Originally posted by ultrabeat
Thats not a bad idea!💡

A convertable 4x4...
What about a Convertable MPV! Is there a market for that?

Renault built a 2-door MPV with a full-length sliding glass roof. They didn't sell too many.
 
Originally posted by GilesGuthrie
Renault built a 2-door MPV with a full-length sliding glass roof. They didn't sell too many.

Yeah, but they tried to convince people it was a coupe. I distinctly remember a "Car" giant test where they had the Avantime against, like, the CLK and 330Ci - it looked so stupid there.
 
I heard about that.
I like Renault's suicidal designs:)
 
I don't see the POINT of an SUV, since I don't see a single family with like 5 kids anymore. And no matter how "macho - looking" and powerful they are, 90% of them still perform like Greyhound Buses (I mean these things are like 0-60 in 8-or-so seconds, with slalom speeds of around 62-63). And what's this "off-road" bullcrap? I bet you less than 5% of SUVs purchased in the last ANY NUMBER of years have actually been taken off city/highway roads? Just a few weeks ago I saw my neighbor a couple of houses down getting buckets of mud and throwing them on his car (presumably to make it look like he went "off road")! Of course, the main reason so many of these SUVs are sold is because most people follow whatever the majority of people are doing, no matter what they're doing, like sheep following a herd. I'm not saying some people don't live in adverse conditions that would require something like 4WD, but to have a special vehicle just to go off road? Of course, another main reason people buy SUVs is to feel "big, bossy, and 'in control of the road'. I drive pretty much the smallest car on the road at any particular point in time (save motorcycles, the MR2 is about 2300 or so lbs i believe), and I don't feel little and unimportant or anything like that. In fact, I feel more in contral than in a large vehicle, knowing that if I need to make an evasive maneuver, I can do so w/o rolling like a soda can (although it does scare me sometimes that these behemoths are on the same road as me, sometimes completely occupuied in the conversations on their cell phones instead of the road)!
 
Originally posted by Joecool593
I don't see the POINT of an SUV

There aren't any alternatives.

Unless you want us all to have sedans, in which case I don't see the POINT of your MEMBERSHIP.
 
Lord help me. Someone on a building site a mile away from me owns a VehiCross.





NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!.
 
I don't see the POINT of an SUV, since I don't see a single family with like 5 kids anymore. And no matter how "macho - looking" and powerful they are, 90% of them still perform like Greyhound Buses (I mean these things are like 0-60 in 8-or-so seconds, with slalom speeds of around 62-63). And what's this "off-road" bullcrap? I bet you less than 5% of SUVs purchased in the last ANY NUMBER of years have actually been taken off city/highway roads? Just a few weeks ago I saw my neighbor a couple of houses down getting buckets of mud and throwing them on his car (presumably to make it look like he went "off road")! Of course, the main reason so many of these SUVs are sold is because most people follow whatever the majority of people are doing, no matter what they're doing, like sheep following a herd. I'm not saying some people don't live in adverse conditions that would require something like 4WD, but to have a special vehicle just to go off road? Of course, another main reason people buy SUVs is to feel "big, bossy, and 'in control of the road'. I drive pretty much the smallest car on the road at any particular point in time (save motorcycles, the MR2 is about 2300 or so lbs i believe), and I don't feel little and unimportant or anything like that. In fact, I feel more in contral than in a large vehicle, knowing that if I need to make an evasive maneuver, I can do so w/o rolling like a soda can (although it does scare me sometimes that these behemoths are on the same road as me, sometimes completely occupuied in the conversations on their cell phones instead of the road)!
I totally agree. M5 what is wrong with sedans, vans wagons etc?
 
It's hard to have a cool van, without looking like an A Team reject.
 
Originally posted by lsk8er
I totally agree. M5 what is wrong with sedans, vans wagons etc?

Sedans should be obvious. Vans and wagons are NOT a viable alternative to SUVs because they DO NOT offer all-wheel drive. Yes, some vans have it - the cheapest one is $32000, which is more expensive than about 60% of all SUVs. The only wagon under $32000 with AWD is the Subaru Outback, and they're already hugely popular. Basically, it goes this way: if you've got $25000, need all-wheel drive, and don't like the Subaru Outback, YOU HAVE NO CHOICE BUT AN SUV. Simple

Oh, and I realise it's trendy to rag on SUVs for whatever reason, but it's intelligent to do a bit of research first.
 
No, its trendy to buy SUVs. If you need AWD buy a Subaru, thats more of a wagon than an SUV anyway. Why do you need AWD anyway?
 
Originally posted by lsk8er
If you need AWD buy a Subaru,


Dude, read. ...if you've got $25000, need all-wheel drive, and don't like the Subaru Outback, YOU HAVE NO CHOICE BUT AN SUV. Strangely, not everyone can 'buy a Subaru', some of us have differing tastes. Also, some of us find it necessary to make a decision between twenty SUVs in a very competitive range trying to be the best value rather than choose one station wagon by default.

thats more of a wagon than an SUV anyway.

Ah - you didn't read what I wrote in the first place. What's the point?

Why do you need AWD anyway?

:rolleyes:

Why do humans need cars at all?
 
Recap what Ford and GMC did.

Ford:
1. Escape
2. Explorer
3. Expedition
4. Excursion


GMC:
1. Jimmy
2. Yukon
3. Yukon XL


BMW is only trying to compete. Give them a brake.
 
Back