Which tv's...

  • Thread starter Thread starter bullet360
  • 45 comments
  • 3,041 views
Slashfan
This TV is the best TV I've ever owned. Vizio are too bright and Sharps are good.

What year did you get it?
 
I want to say late 2010 or really really early 2011.
 
I currently have a 20 inch 720p LG and I must admit, 1080P and a larger screen does wonders. :I
 
I have a Sony KDL 40HX720. Very happy with it.
 
Do note: The PS3 can only do 3D games at 720P. Only movies are 1080P
 
"Sony's are junk,they only have good sound,everyone thinks their good cause they are spensive"

not so i play on 42" sony bravia 1080p its a bad ass tv for ps3 or anything else

sony have wicked color
 
"Sony's are junk,they only have good sound,everyone thinks their good cause they are spensive"

not so i play on 42" sony bravia 1080p its a bad ass tv for ps3 or anything else

sony have wicked color

Indeed, tv's are a matter of taste. But saying sony's bad is just stupid. Read the reviews online, read about the prizes those tv's won...
 
Sony's are junk,they only have good sound,everyone thinks their good cause they are spensive. I would say vizio or sharp. Stay far away from 3D for a while or forever for that matter. The industry jumped the gun on the technology

A lot of uninformed junk in that statement 👎.
 
Vizio's have the worst reliabilities ratings in the industry. I have a Samsung 46" 1080p/240hz/3D/SmarTV.. Its the best TV that fit my budget and needs.
 
I had a plasma 3D tv for 3 days... before throwing it back into the shop in anger, Main reason Screen burn... 1 play (for 1 hour) of GT5 left the dials burnt onto the screen, Sure it cleared them up with the burn cleaning system on the TV... but I dont want to have to DO anything to keep my TV working properly.

So I went for 200hz LED Samsung and now EVERY tv I've bought and will ever buy will be LED, LCD has too much motion blur and the contrast ratio isnt up to spec for my liking.

Where as LED you get insane crispness, deep blacks and bright whites and smooth as oiled silk for picture.

Also always review your tvs, There are some new LG 3D led tvs which on paper look amazing, I nearly bought one myself to enjoy GT5 in 3D... only to read they suffer from crippling input lag, its so bad that some people have reviewed the LG 3D LED tvs as making games unplayable!

They are the LW450, 550 and 650 models if anyone is interested.
 
I picked up a 47" LG LED 1080p 120Hz for $600 on boxing day. It looks extremely good, and I'm coming off of sitting directly in front of a 23" 1080p monitor, where you really notice graphical/display flaws because you're so close. I really don't think you can beat this TV for the price. I didn't get a plasma because I'm a little scared of burn-in, as I leave a lot of still images on my TV. Also if you get LED or plasma plan on getting some axillary speakers as the ones that come in the TV are generally horrible.

Edit: I also dodged 3D because the increased price, I don't watch much 3D content, and I hate the idea of having to wear the glasses, seems like an annoyance.
 
MadmuppGT
So I went for 200hz LED Samsung and now EVERY tv I've bought and will ever buy will be LED, LCD has too much motion blur and the contrast ratio isnt up to spec for my liking.

LED TV's are still LCD TV's, they just have a different method of back lighting (many LED's as opposed to fluorescent tubes). This means that any motion blur you experienced with a previous LCD that isn't on your new LED back lit LCD is probably because the previous TV model was particularly prone to motion blur, it has nothing to do with the merits of LED back lighting.

That's not to say there are no merits to LED back lighting, it's brilliant. Higher contrast, lower power consumption and thinner TV's. I would always recommend an LED back lit TV if you can pay the little extra.
 
LED TV's are still LCD TV's, they just have a different method of back lighting (many LED's as opposed to fluorescent tubes). This means that any motion blur you experienced with a previous LCD that isn't on your new LED back lit LCD is probably because the previous TV model was particularly prone to motion blur, it has nothing to do with the merits of LED back lighting.

That's not to say there are no merits to LED back lighting, it's brilliant. Higher contrast, lower power consumption and thinner TV's. I would always recommend an LED back lit TV if you can pay the little extra.

Completely agree, here. Your post on the Quattron, I can't really argue any facts, and I completely understand your view point.

But I have to say that there is definitely a huge difference. I notice it most with reviewing images. Autoshow images and landscapes are just breathtaking. But I am also partially color blind. A lot of males are, but are not aware.

My point is, I have done zero research on Quattrons outside of my own television, and since I purchased, but can personally recommend them, at least to be checked out.

I feel like for video gaming without a cost of an electric bill, plasma is the way to go. I believe them to be heavier, and assume they are less fuel efficient (because they get so hot, compared to my LED and fl. backlit LCDs).

But, they are usually cheaper to buy originally. Really, though, the best bet for anyone is to go to Best Buy and look around. See what looks nice to you. Ask questions. Go back, and do the same thing. Go to different stores. Ask the same questions, and new ones. Build your knowledge wealth, and watch prices. When you find a few you want, bring in your PS3 and test it out on what you narrow down. When you decide your television, watch prices. Also, keep in mind market trends (ie, when oLED is coming out, what time of the year it is (superbowl/december/E3)). And when you find your perfect television, for the perfect price, you will rejoice.

Seriously, my television w/ a four year all inclusive warranty cost me 200 less than the device itself normally. 1499 slashed to 1050, then 250 for warranty.

Oh, and research your warranty, also. A lot of people don't recommend them, but SOME are worth it. I love Best Buy for the Black Tie. I have personally experience replacements for a notebook with a bb through the screen, and two cameras broken at my fault. And a pixel burnt out on a television w/ the warranty, and it is already qualified for the replacement. We are just waiting until closer to the end. For the price, you are gauranteed a television for that long, or you get a replacement. Brand new, of exact equal value or greater. Or, you can get the money value towards another product.
 
I had a plasma 3D tv for 3 days... before throwing it back into the shop in anger, Main reason Screen burn... 1 play (for 1 hour) of GT5 left the dials burnt onto the screen, Sure it cleared them up with the burn cleaning system on the TV... but I dont want to have to DO anything to keep my TV working properly.

So I went for 200hz LED Samsung and now EVERY tv I've bought and will ever buy will be LED, LCD has too much motion blur and the contrast ratio isnt up to spec for my liking.

Where as LED you get insane crispness, deep blacks and bright whites and smooth as oiled silk for picture.

Also always review your tvs, There are some new LG 3D led tvs which on paper look amazing, I nearly bought one myself to enjoy GT5 in 3D... only to read they suffer from crippling input lag, its so bad that some people have reviewed the LG 3D LED tvs as making games unplayable!

They are the LW450, 550 and 650 models if anyone is interested.

I got a Samsung plasma TV for cheap on Black Friday. I got it because plasma has a higher refresh rate, vivid colors, and deep blacks. You just have to let it have time to break in. When I first got mine it did get screen burn easy but now after a few months of owning it, it does not get it at all.

I have nothing against LED TVs I just got the plasma because of its benefits and it was cheaper. It's a great TV though!
 
I have a 46" Sony Bravia LED 1080p. Works perfect with GT5. Not a huge fan of plasma tv's.
 
For got to add in, my TV is an LED.
 
Back