- 3,194
Originally posted by DGB454
Adam didn't need a sacrafice to stand before God. All he had to do was love him. I think that's the way it's suppose to be but we messed up.
Why am I punished for his f-up?
Originally posted by DGB454
Adam didn't need a sacrafice to stand before God. All he had to do was love him. I think that's the way it's suppose to be but we messed up.
Originally posted by ledhed
Anyway I am not considered a liberal and I am against teaching religion in school unless it is in a purely historical context.
Originally posted by milefile
DGB- There's no particular line I want to quote of yours, and I don't want to take up all that space just to say... to me the entire idea of perfection is misconstrued, and god is based on it. The entire idea of god is derived from an error in perception. God is a synthetic concept people use to to take refuge from the reality of becoming, life and death and constant change, because these things can often be very hard. It's no suprise people want a way to organize the chaos that is the world. Creating the concept of a perfect being is perhaps a necessary first step toward that. But like everything else, humanity will surpass it just like it surpassed the need for god-kings.
Two thousand years and not one new god?
Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
In a nut-shell,... I think a word that goes well with that is "Closure". Many people, oppressed or not,... need it.
Why am I punished for his f-up?
Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
Why am I punished for his f-up?
Originally posted by 12sec. Civic
I believe in science. What you see is what you get. Humans cant accept the fact that things are most often simpler than they think.
I have thought about this for so long that all of the thoughts in my head have been so muddled I have trouble releasing them in a logical manner that comes together as a sentence!
Basically, I have "faith" in the goodness of humans, and the fact that we are all very similar and for the most part, want the same things. I know that what I am saying here makes me sound pretty stupid, because I have trouble expressing these kinds of thoughts. But anyways, if you want to know what I wish listen to "Imagine" by John Lennon. I wish people could live happily together and like everyone.
I kind of want to prove that I can be a good person without religion. If you need religion to make you want to give someone a ride home, or toss a homeless guy a dollar, you obviously dont see why something like that is good for the world on your own. Someone has just told you that you should do things like that. I always do nice things to people whenever I get the chance.
Originally posted by ledhed
Its far from being only liberals who do not want religion tought in public schools. Its unconstitutional to bring church and state together using federal funds. Public schools belong to the whole country , everyone. Look at it this way Public schools belong to everyone, everyone does not share the same religion. How is it fair to teach religion in public schools unless you segregate the school by religion . Now in doing that won't you be discriminating against everyone involved ? Is that type of discrimination or seperation even if it were possible, desireable ? Anyway I am not considered a liberal and I am against teaching religion in school unless it is in a purely historical context. You wan't to learn religion talk to your parents or go to church.
Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
Why am I punished for his f-up?
Originally posted by milefile
DGB- There's no particular line I want to quote of yours, and I don't want to take up all that space just to say... to me the entire idea of perfection is misconstrued, and god is based on it. The entire idea of god is derived from an error in perception. God is a synthetic concept people use to to take refuge from the reality of becoming, life and death and constant change, because these things can often be very hard. It's no suprise people want a way to organize the chaos that is the world. Creating the concept of a perfect being is perhaps a necessary first step toward that. But like everything else, humanity will surpass it just like it surpassed the need for god-kings.
Two thousand years and not one new god?
Originally posted by DGB454
Not a new God? I don't really understand. Why would we need a new one?
Originally posted by ledhed
@ milefile, I would have to think that throughout history men have sat down and rationalized faith or religion in the same way and come to the same conclusions as you have. After all it seems to be the only logical conclusion when you try to combine scientific facts as we know them and basic human nature along with historical context. In the end it all boils down to faith. I have always found it very easy to debunk every religiouse theory that was presented to me by using an historical or logical or scientific argument. Thats always the big mystery to me about religion we may be able to explain the universe and what used to be the mystery of nature in human terms , life itself down to the first cell spliting . We have the ability to create life itself from a petri dish so we need not use religion to say GOD created life , stars . planets.etc. all things that were at one time a great mystery to us. But no one has ever been able to tell me how to create give or modify a soul. That to me is worth the effort to find the answer to. It seems to me if you believe you have a soul you may want to take care of it.
Originally posted by milefile
Understanding your soul is not an ongoing thing. It happens all at once, and is gone. The point of life is to feel it again, a sort of addiction to life and the world, in a way.
Originally posted by Pako
ledhed,
Wow, that's pretty intense ledhed! I've never looked at it that way before. It is very thought provoking.
What it appears your talking about here is spirituallity, which in my estimation is seperate from religion. My definition of spirituallity is a personal relationship with God, and awareness if you will. This is not achieved through religious works, but rather the practice of awareness of God in our lives and the daily building of a one-on-one relationship with Him.
Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
Why do you feel the need to have a personal, one-on-one relationship with him? Isn't the sacrifice of his only son good enough? Or is it that he demands a relationship?
Originally posted by Pako
Here's a scenario for you. Your stuck on a mountain. You've been climbing up this mountain for days. Your entire body is exausted. Your not sure if you can continue up the mountain or not. The whole time there has been a rope dangling down from the top of mountain to aid you in your journey. You have decided to make the trip on your own. Do you decide to grab the rope and climb up taking it's advantages or do you continue to climb without the aid of the rope?
I have choosen to take ahold of the rope. It is a straight path, following the guide of the rope. It is my faith that leads me to believe that the rope will hold my weight and that it is securly attached to the top of mountain.
Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
Ok,.. thats where we differ then. I have no intensions of ever grabbing the rope. I've always had to bust my ass for the accomplishments I've achieved. If someone would've assisted me, I would've came up short in the self-determination catagory.
Originally posted by Pako
How can there be only 'self' in that? In my estimation, we are all apart of something much bigger.
A bouble edged sword that can be good, but can also relut in a lot of selfishness.Originally posted by Pako
If self-determination is that high on the category listing, then I can totally see your point. In the early 70's and forward, there has been a huge movement of "self". Self motivation, self help, self success, self healing, finding your self..... so on and so forth.
It's a metter of defining the "rope." Also, the "something much bigger" is embodied in every single one of us.I see it more as being just a part of a whole. As milefile pointed out, a life force that's in everything. How can there be only 'self' in that? In my estimation, we are all apart of something much bigger.
Originally posted by Pako
Sorry, I'll use spell checker next time.
![]()
Originally posted by milefile
Ummm... okay. Was that for me?