Why can't a thread about religion be civil

  • Thread starter Thread starter ledhed
  • 124 comments
  • 2,596 views
Originally posted by ledhed
Anyway I am not considered a liberal and I am against teaching religion in school unless it is in a purely historical context.

Exactly. And that is the only way it can be taught. The rest has to come to the individual through an epiphany, and this will happen in as many ways as there are people. Teaching kids religion in school amounts to moral conduct training, nothing more.
 
DGB- There's no particular line I want to quote of yours, and I don't want to take up all that space just to say... to me the entire idea of perfection is misconstrued, and god is based on it. The entire idea of god is derived from an error in perception. God is a synthetic concept people use to to take refuge from the reality of becoming, life and death and constant change, because these things can often be very hard. It's no suprise people want a way to organize the chaos that is the world. Creating the concept of a perfect being is perhaps a necessary first step toward that. But like everything else, humanity will surpass it just like it surpassed the need for god-kings.

Two thousand years and not one new god?
 
Originally posted by milefile
DGB- There's no particular line I want to quote of yours, and I don't want to take up all that space just to say... to me the entire idea of perfection is misconstrued, and god is based on it. The entire idea of god is derived from an error in perception. God is a synthetic concept people use to to take refuge from the reality of becoming, life and death and constant change, because these things can often be very hard. It's no suprise people want a way to organize the chaos that is the world. Creating the concept of a perfect being is perhaps a necessary first step toward that. But like everything else, humanity will surpass it just like it surpassed the need for god-kings.

Two thousand years and not one new god?

In a nut-shell,... I think a word that goes well with that is "Closure". Many people, oppressed or not,... need it.
 
Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
In a nut-shell,... I think a word that goes well with that is "Closure". Many people, oppressed or not,... need it.

Only like all "closure," it is an illusion, a way one chooses to feel in spite of reality. In the long run it doesn't suffice. People will start asking questions like...

Why am I punished for his f-up?
 
Originally posted by 12sec. Civic
I believe in science. What you see is what you get. Humans cant accept the fact that things are most often simpler than they think.


I have thought about this for so long that all of the thoughts in my head have been so muddled I have trouble releasing them in a logical manner that comes together as a sentence!

Basically, I have "faith" in the goodness of humans, and the fact that we are all very similar and for the most part, want the same things. I know that what I am saying here makes me sound pretty stupid, because I have trouble expressing these kinds of thoughts. But anyways, if you want to know what I wish listen to "Imagine" by John Lennon. I wish people could live happily together and like everyone.


I kind of want to prove that I can be a good person without religion. If you need religion to make you want to give someone a ride home, or toss a homeless guy a dollar, you obviously dont see why something like that is good for the world on your own. Someone has just told you that you should do things like that. I always do nice things to people whenever I get the chance.

Actually you don't need religion to be a good person or even to be saved. Orginized religion as I see it is a way for people of like faith to have a place to go where they can be with others like them and learn and draw support from each other as well as having a place to worship together.
 
Originally posted by ledhed
Its far from being only liberals who do not want religion tought in public schools. Its unconstitutional to bring church and state together using federal funds. Public schools belong to the whole country , everyone. Look at it this way Public schools belong to everyone, everyone does not share the same religion. How is it fair to teach religion in public schools unless you segregate the school by religion . Now in doing that won't you be discriminating against everyone involved ? Is that type of discrimination or seperation even if it were possible, desireable ? Anyway I am not considered a liberal and I am against teaching religion in school unless it is in a purely historical context. You wan't to learn religion talk to your parents or go to church.

I am against it being taught in school too. I am also against it being banned from the school.
 
Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
Why am I punished for his f-up?

Here's something that's interesting.... (This could be fact or fiction, I don't know either way, but here are some tid bits I've picked up along the way) There has been some talk in the scientific community that psychotic behavior can be genetically transfered. You can be punished for the sins of your fathers, in some instances it is implied for up to 12 generations. Personally I have a hard time swallowing that. I do believe in free will, and the ability to choose my course of actions. There is, however, so much that we do not know about the human mind and how it works, so it is possible that what I see as "My" choice, is being influenced by 'something' else. How can we be truly sure.
 
Originally posted by milefile
DGB- There's no particular line I want to quote of yours, and I don't want to take up all that space just to say... to me the entire idea of perfection is misconstrued, and god is based on it. The entire idea of god is derived from an error in perception. God is a synthetic concept people use to to take refuge from the reality of becoming, life and death and constant change, because these things can often be very hard. It's no suprise people want a way to organize the chaos that is the world. Creating the concept of a perfect being is perhaps a necessary first step toward that. But like everything else, humanity will surpass it just like it surpassed the need for god-kings.

Two thousand years and not one new god?

I can't argue with your perception of God or his perfection because it is what you believe.
I do know in myself that God is not a synthetic concept. I have a relationship with him. It's a little hard to explain unless you have been in that relationship. Believe me that sometimes I wonder about it and think that possibly I'm wrong. That doesn't happen very often but it does happen occasionaly. That's when I have to really lean faith.

Not a new God? I don't really understand. Why would we need a new one?
 
@ milefile, I would have to think that throughout history men have sat down and rationalized faith or religion in the same way and come to the same conclusions as you have. After all it seems to be the only logical conclusion when you try to combine scientific facts as we know them and basic human nature along with historical context. In the end it all boils down to faith. I have always found it very easy to debunk every religiouse theory that was presented to me by using an historical or logical or scientific argument. Thats always the big mystery to me about religion we may be able to explain the universe and what used to be the mystery of nature in human terms , life itself down to the first cell spliting . We have the ability to create life itself from a petri dish so we need not use religion to say GOD created life , stars . planets.etc. all things that were at one time a great mystery to us. But no one has ever been able to tell me how to create give or modify a soul. That to me is worth the effort to find the answer to. It seems to me if you believe you have a soul you may want to take care of it.
 
Originally posted by ledhed
@ milefile, I would have to think that throughout history men have sat down and rationalized faith or religion in the same way and come to the same conclusions as you have. After all it seems to be the only logical conclusion when you try to combine scientific facts as we know them and basic human nature along with historical context. In the end it all boils down to faith. I have always found it very easy to debunk every religiouse theory that was presented to me by using an historical or logical or scientific argument. Thats always the big mystery to me about religion we may be able to explain the universe and what used to be the mystery of nature in human terms , life itself down to the first cell spliting . We have the ability to create life itself from a petri dish so we need not use religion to say GOD created life , stars . planets.etc. all things that were at one time a great mystery to us. But no one has ever been able to tell me how to create give or modify a soul. That to me is worth the effort to find the answer to. It seems to me if you believe you have a soul you may want to take care of it.

I tried to address the mysterious aspect in my first long post. Becoming, to me, is more perfect than what we commonly call perfect. Few people would look at a log rotting in the woods and call it perfect. But it is. It must not be any other way for life, and life makes sure of that... without any help.

I see my "soul (although I have a problem with the word, and prefer to use "being")" in such things. I feel my being when I precieve it in the context of the world... when I stand in the Grand Canyon and understand my significance and place in that context... when I saw my son born... looking at the sky at night and understanding that earth is a tiny little rock in the inexplicable universe... as the sun rises over the mountains... while looking at pictures of Dresden or Hiroshima or Auschwitz at the end of WWII (it doesn't have to make me happy to sublimate me)... It happens when the world comes together and something fundemental about life is revealed, seemingly for the first time, every time. That is when I feel alive and know that the same force that runs through all those things also runs through me; I feel my being as interwoven with all Being.

I used to be a religious Christian. When my Christian principles were subjected themselves, I found that I had become too Christian to continue being Christian. Christianity consumes itself. The idea of the Christian god is the ultimate contradiction, hence untenable.

So my shedding of Christianity was as natural and necessary as a snake shedding its skin. It didn't remove the possibility for spiritual sublimation from me, but rather, it enhanced and stimulated it, bringing "soul" or as I prefer, being, into a meaningful, applicable, and living context.

How can I prove something that is only evidenced in me by a feeling? What else is faith if not that? We look at the same thing and feel somthing different, practically see different things.

Understanding your soul is not an ongoing thing. It happens all at once, and is gone. The point of life is to feel it again, a sort of addiction to life and the world, in a way.

*That last sentence is pretty lame, but will have to do for the time being.
 
Originally posted by milefile

Understanding your soul is not an ongoing thing. It happens all at once, and is gone. The point of life is to feel it again, a sort of addiction to life and the world, in a way.



Not lame,... I've had a similar experience.
 
ledhed,

Wow, that's pretty intense ledhed! I've never looked at it that way before. It is very thought provoking.

What it appears your talking about here is spirituallity, which in my estimation is seperate from religion. My definition of spirituallity is a personal relationship with God, and awareness if you will. This is not achieved through religious works, but rather the practice of awareness of God in our lives and the daily building of a one-on-one relationship with Him.
 
Originally posted by Pako
ledhed,

Wow, that's pretty intense ledhed! I've never looked at it that way before. It is very thought provoking.

What it appears your talking about here is spirituallity, which in my estimation is seperate from religion. My definition of spirituallity is a personal relationship with God, and awareness if you will. This is not achieved through religious works, but rather the practice of awareness of God in our lives and the daily building of a one-on-one relationship with Him.


Why do you feel the need to have a personal, one-on-one relationship with him? Isn't the sacrifice of his only son good enough? Or is it that he demands a relationship?
 
Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
Why do you feel the need to have a personal, one-on-one relationship with him? Isn't the sacrifice of his only son good enough? Or is it that he demands a relationship?

In simplistic terms:

Why should I settle for a hamburger when I can have a T-Bone Steak?

------------

Nothing is ever demanded of us. He is always there for us, making himself availble when we are willing to accept him. Again it comes down to a choice.

Here's a scenario for you. Your stuck on a mountain. You've been climbing up this mountain for days. Your entire body is exausted. Your not sure if you can continue up the mountain or not. The whole time there has been a rope dangling down from the top of mountain to aid you in your journey. You have decided to make the trip on your own. Do you decide to grab the rope and climb up taking it's advantages or do you continue to climb without the aid of the rope?

I have choosen to take ahold of the rope. It is a straight path, following the guide of the rope. It is my faith that leads me to believe that the rope will hold my weight and that it is securly attached to the top of mountain.
 
Redeyeballs , not everyone accepts Christian dogma, I'm trying to take religion in a broad sense. I do not want to exclude any other faith or pass judgement on it. After all almost all religions are about the same thing at there core. They just have different rules and different ways of reaching the same conclusions. Sometimes its good to step away from a subject and look at it in strictly analytical terms, by removing any predudice you may have. The search here is for knowlage. I know of no better way to go about it. Than to suspend any preconceived beleifs and open your mind to all possibilitys.
 
Originally posted by Pako

Here's a scenario for you. Your stuck on a mountain. You've been climbing up this mountain for days. Your entire body is exausted. Your not sure if you can continue up the mountain or not. The whole time there has been a rope dangling down from the top of mountain to aid you in your journey. You have decided to make the trip on your own. Do you decide to grab the rope and climb up taking it's advantages or do you continue to climb without the aid of the rope?

I have choosen to take ahold of the rope. It is a straight path, following the guide of the rope. It is my faith that leads me to believe that the rope will hold my weight and that it is securly attached to the top of mountain.


Ok,.. thats where we differ then. I have no intensions of ever grabbing the rope. I've always had to bust my ass for the accomplishments I've achieved. If someone would've assisted me, I would've came up short in the self-determination catagory.

And led,... I'm not trying to be a hard ass here. I'm trying to inform myself by taking into context the other sides opinions. The only way to do that (for me) is to be skeptical and analytical. 👍
 
Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
Ok,.. thats where we differ then. I have no intensions of ever grabbing the rope. I've always had to bust my ass for the accomplishments I've achieved. If someone would've assisted me, I would've came up short in the self-determination catagory.

If self-determination is that high on the category listing, then I can totally see your point. In the early 70's and forward, there has been a huge movement of "self". Self motivation, self help, self success, self healing, finding your self..... so on and so forth. I see it more as being just a part of a whole. As milefile pointed out, a life force that's in everything. How can there be only 'self' in that? In my estimation, we are all apart of something much bigger.
 
Originally posted by Pako
How can there be only 'self' in that? In my estimation, we are all apart of something much bigger.

I think so too,... only there's no consiquences, awards, or end result. Only the continuation of evolution to the particular species upon it death. IMO, it is 'self. Life is how YOU make it, not how someone/thing tells you to make it.
 
Originally posted by Pako
If self-determination is that high on the category listing, then I can totally see your point. In the early 70's and forward, there has been a huge movement of "self". Self motivation, self help, self success, self healing, finding your self..... so on and so forth.
A bouble edged sword that can be good, but can also relut in a lot of selfishness.

I see it more as being just a part of a whole. As milefile pointed out, a life force that's in everything. How can there be only 'self' in that? In my estimation, we are all apart of something much bigger.
It's a metter of defining the "rope." Also, the "something much bigger" is embodied in every single one of us.
 
Of course we can't be civil about religion. We're only dumbasses, after all. Oh, and human too, yeah.
 
Originally posted by milefile
Ummm... okay. Was that for me?

*confusion is setting in*

I thought you deliberately miss spelled words to point out my spelling errors in my above post.

"A bouble edged sword"
"also relut in a lot of"
"It's a metter of defining"

It's all good. ;)
 

Latest Posts

Back