- 6,584

- Kent, UK
- GTP_Jondot
It's not a source, it's a convenient directory.
Eeeeeexactly 👍
It's not a source, it's a convenient directory.
Wiki is great because of the game I play on it, wiki-clicks. Here's how it works -
Minimum of 2 players.
1 player chooses 2 random words e.g Concord & black hole. (That's a bit too easy so don't try that one)
The winner of the game is the person that can get from the Concord page to black hole page by using a few links as possible.
Once the first word is typed in and the page is up, no other use of the keyboard is allowed, it can only be done by clicking on the links within each article page.
EDIT: If any one would like to play it with me, send a PM and I'll send back the 2 words.
A lot of people I've played with are morons and look up all of the links before telling me the 2 words so they know the shortest way.![]()
The goal of this game is to start at a random article, click on the first link in the article text not in parentheses or italics, and then repeat until you reach Philosophy. You then post the number of articles you go through to get to philosophy.
Let me ruin this game... or at least give you a few wins.
Wikipedia right now is a terrible source - as information on there right now could be erroneously entered. Wikipedia a few times in succession is fine as a starting point (that allows you to verify the information) but you should always refer to their sources rather than use it as the source.
I love it, but all the teachers in the school talk about it as it's a terrible source and how everyone who edits it is wrong. I see it in the other students, who get mad when I say wikipedia. As for me, I use it for everything
Yeah old books with out dated information,
Do you like Wikipedia or regard it as a credible source? I love it and think it is a terrific resource.
Some information doesn't date no matter how old it is.
Simple Example. Ohms law is still V=IR just as when I learnt it in the 1980's.
Wiki is a starting point nothing more, it does that well though.
Many a time I've come across incorrect information, take it all with a pinch of salt, it is the interwebs after all.
Cheers Shaun.
I prefer Uncyclopedia
A book on the solar system that said we have 9 planets and Saturn has 30 moons?
My science teacher wanted me to use books rather than wiki.
Whatever those liberal commies in the Commission say, Pluto is still a planet, and by damn, we are going to conquer it! By force!
To me a Planet is an object that orbits its parent star.
A moon is an object that orbit a planet.
So yes i still see that Pluto is a planet.
To me a Planet is an object that orbits its parent star.
A moon is an object that orbit a planet.
So yes i still see that Pluto is a planet.
But i know Saturn has more than 30 moons
Wiki says their are 53 named moons plus 9 un-named and www.nineplanets.org/saturn.html says the same thing.
http://www.solarviews.com/eng/saturn.htm
This site seems to be way out of date.
Better start counting the asteroid belt... and the Oort cloud
What about the bits that make up rings?
Do you? Have you verified them yourself? What you know you've read, and most of the current data is from the Cassini mission, which did reveal a lot of neat and fun things about Saturn.
Looked for NASA when i searched google but it wasn't in the top10.
But when i did my solar system assignment when i was at school i did use NASA and Wiki.
Plus changes are logged in Wiki and most of the time there are checks before edited topic is updated.
I will also count all the objects in the Kuiper Belt while i am at it
Rings are made up of ice, asteroids and other planetary fragments.
Not a single body like a moon is.
Ah yes, I was forgetting something. You must feel clever.
And searching for "NASA Saturn" gave that page quite easily. Learning how to find information is a valuable skill.
When did you do this Solar System assignment anyhow?
To me a Planet is an object that orbits its parent star.
A moon is an object that orbit a planet.
So yes i still see that Pluto is a planet.
But i know Saturn has more than 30 moons
Wiki says their are 53 named moons plus 9 un-named and www.nineplanets.org/saturn.html says the same thing.
http://www.solarviews.com/eng/saturn.htm
This site seems to be way out of date.
Not really.
I love astronomy.
And i am aware that Mars has asteroids that are moons.
I think i saw Triton through a telescope when i was younger.
You must mean Titan. Triton orbits Neptune, has half the diameter of Titan, and a considerable lower albedo than Titan does. Neptune itself comes out no more than a tiny blueish disk under even the most powerful ground-based telescopes.![]()