Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,100,793 views
2006 Pontiac GTO :)

223304d1269411082-2006-gto-upper-grilles-dsc05049-1-.jpg


2001 Camaro SS

2001camaross011.jpg
 
GTO cause Monaro. Even though it's just a JAFOC with a coupe body it is one of the only Holdens that I would really love to own. I love that style Camaro but compared to the Monaro it doesn't do anything for me.
 
Pontiac eeeeeasily
A harder one (for me at least)
Pontiac GTO 6.0L
ccw001psene1.jpg

OR
Terminator Cobra
ford-svt-mustang-cobra-05.jpg

As sexy as that GTO looks, the terminator is just menacing
 
Camaro VS Caprice: Camaro. The Caprice is boring inside and out, and the interior is old plasticy GM junk.

GTO VS Camaro: Camaro. I can't stand the newer GTOs. No styling inside and out again, and a similar plasticy interior, though the Camaro's got a subpar interior as well, it at least looks better outside.

GTO VS Mustang: Mustang. That's a no-brainer.
 
Monte Carlo SS Supercharged VS Firebird Trans Am: You mean to tell me that an overweight, awkwardly large, plastic-interiored behemoth with a nearly 20 year old platform under it with a supercharged version of, while a very good engine, sent its power to the front wheels is a worthy alternative to a much faster, nicer looking, cooler, rear wheel drive muscle car? Needless to say, I'll take the Trans Am. It's one of my favorite modern muscle cars, looks the business, goes fast, sounds nice, and can be had for peanuts.

1993 Chevrolet Silverado 454 SS
DSC_0092.JPG


1991 GMC Syclone
1991-gmc-syclone-13.jpg
 
Doog
Monte Carlo SS Supercharged VS Firebird Trans Am: You mean to tell me that an overweight, awkwardly large, plastic-interiored behemoth with a nearly 20 year old platform under it with a supercharged version of, while a very good engine, sent its power to the front wheels is a worthy alternative to a much faster, nicer looking, cooler, rear wheel drive muscle car?
Click to expand...


http://[domain blocked due to malware]/instances/400x/29006465.jpg
 
Doog
Monte Carlo SS Supercharged VS Firebird Trans Am: You mean to tell me that an overweight, awkwardly large, plastic-interiored behemoth with a nearly 20 year old platform under it with a supercharged version of, while a very good engine, sent its power to the front wheels is a worthy alternative to a much faster, nicer looking, cooler, rear wheel drive muscle car? Needless to say, I'll take the Trans Am. It's one of my favorite modern muscle cars, looks the business, goes fast, sounds nice, and can be had for peanuts.
Click to expand...

Have you Been watching wheeler dealers lately?
 
-> ...
Kent
How about...

Focus st or mazda speed 3?
Click to expand...
^ After seeing the Focus ST in person & upclose, I'd pick the ST.

brentcostner
2010 Chevy Camaro SS 6.2L OHV V8

2012 Chevy Caprice 6.0L OHV V8
Click to expand...
^ The Caprice, because Cop Car.

brentcostner
2006 Pontiac GTO :)

2001 Camaro SS
Click to expand...
^ GTO easy.

motortrend
Pontiac eeeeeasily
A harder one (for me at least)
Pontiac GTO 6.0L

OR
Terminator Cobra
Click to expand...
^ Its kinda unfair for a tuned Mustang against a stock GTO. :indiff:

-> Either way, I'd still pick the GTO.

Street Racer
Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Supercharged

OR

picture6va.png
Click to expand...
^ LOL WUT!? Of course, the Trans Am.

Doog
1993 Chevrolet Silverado 454 SS

1991 GMC Syclone
Click to expand...
^ The Syclone easy.
 
Camaro SS vs. Caprice: The Camaro hands down! ;)

Pontiac GTO vs. Camaro: GTO because Holden Marano and I had the pleasure of being in one plus rode in one. :D

GTO vs. Cobra: Tough choice.... Give me BOTH! :D

Monte Carlo SS vs. Trans-Am: The Monte Carlo is crap, I hate that car it's not like the real MC from the '70s and 80's. The Trans-Am, I loved that car since I seen them on the roads and with a LS1 engine, muscular design and a T-Top? :sly:👍

One day I'll own a 2002 TA Firebird along with a Toyota Supra TT and 300ZX Z32 TT.

Chevy Silverado 454 vs. GMC Cyclone: Hmmm, tough choice, but I'll take..... Both.


Here's some power wagons to chose from. Two Inline 6 with Twin Turbo engines that can kick major butt anytime.

Audi RS2 Avant

audi-rs2-avant-01.jpg


vs.

Nissan Stagea 260RS

nissan-stagea-rs-four-01.jpg


I'll take them both, because RS and Nismo. ;)
 
Last edited:
Doog
I don't like Chris Harris. :grumpy:
Click to expand...

How can you not like Chris Harris he's one of the best car reviewers there is and also one of the best drivers there is considering hes not a racing driver.

Anyway I would pick Trans Am, Syclone and Stagea.
 
Considering that the real 260RS doesn't look like that, and the manual ones are rarer than, well something very rare and that the automatics are only silly 4 Speeds.

I'll take that 5 seater "Porsche" *Ahem* I mean Audi, thank you very much. 0-60 in under 5 seconds in a nearly twenty year old car? Yes please.
 
JAHHAJ
How can you not like Chris Harris he's one of the best car reviewers there is and also one of the best drivers there is considering hes not a racing driver.
Click to expand...

Eh. I wish he'd go more in depth in describing the entire car, not just a couple driving impressions and some fancy drift shots. He's an ok reviewer, but I don't think he's great.

Stagea VS RS2: RS2, because rare Audis are cooler than rare Nissans.
 

Latest Posts

Back