Would you rather?

  • Thread starter Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,257,623 views
HHR. It looks way better than a PT Cruiser.
 
HHR for me
sort of a weird one
ES300
634720689180007971hqerge5i.JPG

OR
MR2
634732897963877068lmrhjdud.jpg
 
MR2, no question.
 
LOL, am I the only one going for the ES300? :lol:

I like sedan better, so yeah...

On the other hand, I'll take the HHR. Simply, not my taste but much better than the PT.
 
Lexus ES300 vs Toyota MR2- MR2 cause it's a mid engine sports car.
 
It can only be the MR2, turbo'd of course.
And I would probably get the HHR, it would make a bigger fire when I burn it.
 
Hhr, mr2. I cannot get it to let me use capital letters!
 
HHR because it looks better then the PT.

MRS because I like it more then the ES300.
 
-> ...
Even though the PT is, dare I say, better looking, I'd take the HHR.

BATTLE OF THE UGLY!



OR

^ HHR (SS), because Nurburgring.

2008chevrolethhrssturbo.jpg


:sly:

-> And the HHR is NOT ugly, its decent looker.

sort of a weird one
ES300
634720689180007971hqerge5i.JPG

OR
MR2
634732897963877068lmrhjdud.jpg
^ SW20 MR-2, because racecar.

534804_351331278261713_298087080252800_971717_228040430_n.jpg


:)
 
HHR because it's anything but a PT Cruiser.

MR2 to make up for the HHR.
 
I'd take the PT Cruiser.

And probably the MR2.
 
PT cruiser vs HHR - Pt cruiser. Because I could then make my own PT bruiser or the Plymouth Pronto Cruizer Concept. Which was way better looking than the production version.

Allstar%207.jpg

PT Bruiser. 1200hp 500ci Chrysler Wedge engine. quarter mile best ET. 8.8 secs.

ES300 vs MR2 - ES300 I know nothing about. Looks ordinary and dull. I've always liked the MR2's. So MR2 wins.
 
Bom15
PT cruiser vs HHR - Pt cruiser. Because I could then make my own PT bruiser or the the Plymouth Pronto Cruizer Concept. Which was way better looking than the production version.

PT Bruiser. 1200hp 500ci Chrysler Wedge engine. quarter mile best ET. 8.8 secs.

You know the choice was a PT Cruiser and not a PT "Bruiser". If you're spending that kind of money you could probably do that to the HHR too.

HHR - looks better than the PT.

MR2 - will be a much more enjoyable drive.


New one:


2011 BMW E91 335d M Sport

large_1301106781_c58ff70963c2c7f3dbaf0c6cef318deacfa5b40d.jpg



VS

2004 Audi S4 Cabriolet (B6)


2004-audi-s4-cabriolet-index.jpg
 
Last edited:
Audi because V8 and not a diesel.
 
S4- the B6's V8 sound wonderful. Even more so with the top down.
 
BMW E91 335d M Sport vs Audi S4 Cabriolet (B6) BMW cause it's a wagon :D and I hate convertibles.
 
BMW. I don't look good in a convertible, and nor do I want to expose myself to the crappy weather round here, no matter how many V8s a car may or may not have.

Plus I reckon the Bimmer looks better.
 
BMW E91 because I don't like the look of that Audi.
 
BMW. Because it's a fast, torquey, sporty wagon.
 
-> ...
New one:

2011 BMW E91 335d M Sport

large_1301106781_c58ff70963c2c7f3dbaf0c6cef318deacfa5b40d.jpg


VS

2004 Audi S4 Cabriolet (B6)


2004-audi-s4-cabriolet-index.jpg
^ E91 all the way here, because wagon.

^ Plus the only excuse for a trunk/boot is a roadster (like my car, the S2K). :sly:
 
Chrysler PT Cruiser vs Chevy HHR - Even though I strongly dislike the look of both, I'd actually go for the Cruiser. They can look half decent if you mod them right... but most of the time, they just look terrible whatever you do with them.

Lexus ES300 vs Toyota MR2 - MR2. Like the Cruiser, mod them right and they look good. Plus the MR2 is an all around good-looking car. Well, to me it is.

BMW E91 335d M Sport vs Audi S4 Cabriolet (B6) BMW cause it's a wagon :D and I hate convertibles.

^ Exatcly the same reason for me.
 
Toyota Supra vs. Mitsubishi 3000 GTO: So much fatness. Probably take a Supra though because it has a targa top, which is always cool.

JCW MINI vs. Morris Mini: Old Mini, as much as I like the newer MINI's I'd really like to own a classic one at some point.

PT Cruiser vs. Chevy HHR: I'd take the PT if it was the 2.4L Turbo one since they are pretty quick. Their design is over baked but it's still more or less a Neon hatchback so it's not all bad.

2011 BMW 335d vs. 2004 Audi S4 Cabriolet: The BMW, it's a diesel and a station wagon, two things I rather like. Plus the BMW would be way more practical.
 
I'll take the E91. Why? Because wagon and put a E92's V8 inside a build a "M3" like wagon and blow off the doors off of many cars. Plus a rare sight and a what if BMW did create a M3 wagon.
 
You know the choice was a PT Cruiser and not a PT "Bruiser". If you're spending that kind of money you could probably do that to the HHR too

I know. I chose PT cruiser saying I could make my own PT Bruiser. Another cheaper option would be to make the Plymouth Concept. Both are ugly and that's my way of making at least one of them look and perform better. They could be my long term projects. It doesn't ask what you would do with the car after you've purchased it. The HHR I'd most probably have to import it. Otherwise I would try the same kinda thing.

BMW 335D vs Audi S4 - BMW. Still don't like Audi's. BMW's more practical.
 
Dodge Neon
dodge-neon-1.jpg


vs

Pontiac Sunfire
pontiac-sunfire-01.jpg


vs

Chevrolet Cavalier
Chevrolet-model-Chevrolet_Cavalier_Coupe_J.jpg
 
Neon I guess with the 5 speed and the Magnum 150hp engine.
 
BMW because it looks sweet

Cavalier because my dad had one, good on gas, underrated to.
 
Back