Would you rather?

  • Thread starter Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,273,977 views
"4WD hyper wagons"

Mercedes E63 AMG S 4Matic Wagon
2014-Mercedes-Benz-E63-AMG-S-Model-4Matic-Wagon-front-three-quarters-02.jpg


OR​

Mercedes CLS63 AMG S 4Matic Shooting Brake
2014-Mercedes-Benz-CLS-63-AMG-4MATIC-S-Model-Shooting-Brake-02.jpg


OR​

Audi RS6 Avant
audi-rs6-avant-c7-c183110082013115141_6.jpg
 
Naff Looking Thing vs Naff Looking Thing vs So Called Audi

I'll take the so called Audi.
 
I would take the CLS, as it's the sexiest of them.

But, we don't get it, nor do we get the E63 in AWD, so I have to have the RS6 by default.

It's still a good car, nonetheless.
 
so I have to have the RS6 by default.

It's still a good car, nonetheless.

This. We only get RWD versions of the Mercedes' and nor do we get the E63 S estate, so the RS6 it is.
 
Jaguar, Charger, Neither (the 90s were ugly!), Citroen, CLS.
 
E63 AMG Wagon for me! I'm probably one of the only people that likes the look of the new E-Class.
 
2002 Dodge M80 Concept

Engine: 3.7L EKG V6
Horsepower: 210
Torque: 235 lb-ft
Transmission: 5 speed manual

Dodge-M80_Concept_2002_1600x1200_wallpaper_05.jpg


vs

1988 Pontiac Banshee IV

Engine: 4.0L SOHC V8
Horsepower: 230
Torque: 325 lb-ft
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual

1988-pontiac-banshee-concept-car-1.jpg
 
CRZ, Audi, Lexus, and the Pontiac.
 
CLS wagon that is hot.
Lexus
Banshee IV
 
Nissan Maxima vs Lexus ES300; I don't like any of the older Toyota Camrys and that includes the Lexus version, so I pick the Maxima.

2002 Dodge M80 Concept vs 1988 Pontiac Banshee IV; I'm choosing the Pontiac based on looks & performance.
 
Toyota Aygo, the VW Up is my alternate choice though.
 
Mid-Engined Corvette vs. Ford GT90 - Corvette, it doesn't look like a piece of crap.

Honda CR-Z vs. Ferrari Mondial vs. Citroen SM - SM because headturner. I really don't care for the Mondial, and the CR-Z is okay.

Results:
1. Citroen SM
2. Honda CR-Z
3. Ferrari Mondial

Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG 4MATIC Wagon vs. Mercedes-Benz CLS63 AMG 4MATIC Shooting Brake vs. Audi RS6 Avant - RS6, I love RS Audis a loooot. The E63 isn't bad though, but I hate the CLS Shooting Brake.

Results:
1. Audi RS6 Avant
2. Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG 4MATIC Wagon
3. Mercedes-Benz CLS63 AMG 4MATIC Shooting Brake

Nissan Maxima vs. Lexus ES300 - ES, because it's not a 90s Maxima.

Dodge M80 Concept vs. Pontiac Banshee IV - Banshee, I hate anything that has to do with the Dodge Nitro.

Opel Adam vs. Toyota Aygo vs. Volkswagen Up! vs. Nissan Cube - Up!, because it won the 2012 WCOTY.

Results:
1. Volkswagen Up!
2. Toyota Aygo
3. Nissan Cube
4. Opel Adam

Callaway Corvette AeroWagon vs. Cadillac CTS-V Wagon This was really hard, but I'm going to go with the AeroWagon. If the CTS-V was a coupe or sedan, I'd take it.
 
Last edited:
-> I'll make it short...

"4WD hyper wagons"

Mercedes E63 AMG S 4Matic Wagon

OR

Mercedes CLS63 AMG S 4Matic Shooting Brake

OR

Audi RS6 Avant
^ I'd pick the RS6, Audi knows AWD better than MBZ. Plus an AMG non-CUV 4-Matic seems so wrong...


Nissan Maxima

or

Lexus ES300
^ I'd take the Maxima, as long it's an SE model with M/T! :dopey:

-> But, it should've been the I30 v ES300...


2002 Dodge M80 Concept

Engine: 3.7L EKG V6
Horsepower: 210
Torque: 235 lb-ft
Transmission: 5 speed manual

vs

1988 Pontiac Banshee IV

Engine: 4.0L SOHC V8
Horsepower: 230
Torque: 325 lb-ft
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
^ I like the M80 better, it's more of a toy for the dirty stuff than a regular pickup truck.


Opel Adam

or

Toyota Aygo

or

VW Up!

or

Nissan cube
^ I'd take the Up! especially the upcoming Up GT! ;)


Callaway C20 Aerovette

or

Cadillac CTS-V Sportswagon
^ Very, very, very, very tough!!! :scared:

-> I would say both easily, but everyone would hate me for it. So in a very narrow margin, I'd pick the C20...how could you say no to a Corvette Nomad!?
 
Last edited:
Lexus, VW, Corvette.
 
I'll take the Lexus ES, the Pontiac Banshee IV, the Volkswagen Up!, and the Cadillac CTS-V Wagon.


An actual, mid-engined Ferrari with unruly handling, or a "poor man's Ferrari" that is more drivable?


Ferrari 348 TB

ferrari-348-tb-02.jpg


or

Toyota MR2 Turbo (W20)

1347546060.jpg
 
I'm not sure you can call the MR2 more drivable, aside from its lighter steering. Many a SW20 have been spun with lift off oversteer like a classic 911.

In any case I'd have the Ferrari simply because I can't stand the SW20s interior and that wonderful Ferrari 3 spoke wheel with a gated shifter.
 
Superminis; I'll take the Aygo so I can play car soccer with it. The Adam is a mess, the Up is dull and the Cube is awful.

Corvette AeroWagon vs CTS-V Wagon: Corvette easily.

Ferrari 348 vs MR2: I'll go with the 348 since it's a proper Ferrari and not a poor man's attempt to look like a Ferrari.
 
Mercedes-Benz E63 Wagon vs. Mercedes-Benz CLS63 SB vs. Audi RS6: No questions asked: RS6. So good looking car and good performance
Very easy bceause I am a bit of Audi fanboy...
 
Ferrari 348 for me. Similar scenario as the Maybach from earlier; mess with it for a month or 2 until I get sick of it and sell it to some rich person. Use the Money to buy the MR2 as well as any other cars.
 
Last edited:
MR2. Because as far as Ferraris are concerned I wouldn't want to live with the stigma of owning a 348.

Besides, the MR2 Turbo isn't that much slower than the 348, is quite easily tunable, and reliable.
 
In a 1/4 mile situation:

1970 Dodge Charger with a 426 and 4 speed.

Dodge-Charger-1970-RT-426-Hemi-2nd-generation.jpg


or

Tango EV

Tango-T600-Feature-1211.jpg
 
Back