The LFA is just an overpriced Toyota.
Park Avenue VS Bonneville VS Impala VS Aurora VS Seville
The Impala's immediately out because it's just not a very good car. Meh interior, meh exterior, and meh quality. Even if its faster than the prized '96, a front wheel drive Impala SS is just weird. The Bonneville's out because it just looks bad. The Buick's a pretty nice looking car, but the interior's kinda meh, so...yeah. The Aurora's cool, but it to has a kinda dissappointing interior. The Seville is a car I'd actually consider owning if it weren't for the issues with the Northstar engine. It looks nice outside, it looks better than the rest inside, it's faster, and it's probably the comfiest. So I guess that means I'll take the Seville, even though I wouldn't. Huh.
Torino VS Firebird
Holy unfair comparison, Batman. Regardless, I'll still take the Firebird, even with that ugly mug, because of reasons.
LFA VS Gallardo VS F430 VS GT3
The Gallardo's not as nice looking as the last one; they really effed up that update. It's a nice supercar, but it's a little too common as far as supercars go. The Ferrari's also pretty nice, but the looks are just too boring for me. The Porsche is probably a real hoot, but the problem here is that the LFA exists. The LFA's just a masterpiece in workmanship and engineering. It's one of the few current cars you can say is overengineered, like an old Mercedes. It sounds good and apparently it drives pretty good too, so I'll take it.
F1 VS Veyron
Neither are too interesting to me (I have weird tastes), but I'd choose the F1. Though the Veyron's much more livable, quieter and more comfortable, I really wouldn't want a car of its caliber to feel so normal. The F1 will have more rattles, vibrations and noise, but it'll all enhance the experience of driving it. The unique seating position will also help to create a more memorable driving experience.
ZL1 VS IS-F
Tough one. The ZL1's a badass car, has a meatier exhaust note and looks a whole lot more menacing than the IS-F. But the IS-F's a Lexus, which means it'll be more comfortable, quiet and luxurious. It's not a particularly interesting car to look at, but I found the interior to be alright when I sat in one. But I have to take the Camaro. Bunker-like visibility aside, it's just a cooler, more exciting car.
Escape VS CR-V VS Outlander VS Forester
I'm assuming you're talking about the new for 2013 Forester, even though you've got a '12 model pictured. Anyways, the Outlander is immediately out, because it's a Mitsubishi, and there's just something inherently unappealing about a Mitsubishi. The Honda's out because it's kinda boring. The new Forester's a pretty sharp looking thing, but it has a CVT. The Escape's a really nice looking little crossover, and the interior looks and feels great. The 2.5 liter engine may be a snoozer, but its no worse than any of the other base models here, except maybe the Forester. Boxer engines are always interesting.
428i VS A5
The Audi's a very good looking car, but the design's kinda getting stale now. The interior, like any Audi, is kinda blah, though good quality. The new 4-Series is a beautiful car, and it has a nice interior to match. It's also rear wheel drive, which is always more interesting than the Audi's four wheel drive.
