Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,100,793 views
Mazdaspeed Protege vs. Dodge SRT4 - Mazda, I hate Neons.

Acura Legend LS Coupe vs. Lexus SC300 vs. Acura 3.0CL Premium - Legend with the manual. Although I'm biased on the Acuras, so the Lexus was out of the question.
 
1970 Ford Mustang Boss 302

1970BOSS302Mustang.jpg


1969 Chevrolet Camaro RS/SS

75383_Front_3-4_Web.jpg
 
1970 Ford Mustang Boss 302 vs. 1969 Chevrolet Camaro RS/SS

I'd be happy with either car but I'd rather have the Camaro especially if it comes with the 396.
 
Legend vs. SC300 vs. CL

Not very keen on the CL's or Lexus' styling, and the Legend's silky smooth V6 seems too good to miss.

Boss vs. RS/SS


Boss by far. The Camaro looks quite ugly with those headlights, much prefer the earlier model Camaros headlights (IMO).
 
Q50
Cayman
Neon
Doog
Cadenza VS Q50 VS 328i

Interesting, a full size car, a midsize car (albeit borderline, really), and a compact car here, in that respective order. The 328i is out, because while I'm a fan of the F30 3-Series, I'd prefer the six cylinder 335i. The Kia's a pretty nice car, even with that odd grille it has. The interior's very nice as well, while definitely a conservative design compared to other modern interiors, actually reminds me of an Infiniti interior. Funnily enough, the Q50's interior reminds me of that of a Hyundai Sonata's, which isn't good because I don't like the styling of the Sonata's interior. Sure the Q50's a pretty attractive car exterior-wise, but I'm gonna be sitting inside the car most of the time, not looking at it from a distance, and as such, I want a nice interior. For that reason I'd take the Cadenza, with its nicer interior and classy exterior. Sure it's not as interesting to drive, but as a daily driver, it'd do very well.

Cayman VS 911 Turbo

The 911 would be hella fun to drive, but it's just not a very exciting car outside, or inside as far as looks go. The new Cayman is very strong in the looks department, and like any new Porsche, it has a beautiful interior. Combine this with a mid engined layout that's sure to make things more lively, as well as steering that's regarded as the best in the business by more than a few, and you've got yourself a very attractive sports car.

Mazdaspeed Protege VS Neon SRT-4

I like the first generation Dodge Neon. Safe, luxurious and refined it was not, but if you're looking for a quirky, fun to drive little runabout, the original Neon was and still is (albeit for much less money now) a great choice. Much like the Ford Focus, the Neon lost its original flare and became more muted in its second iteration. Sure it was safer, more luxurious (relatively), and more refined, but you don't see car guys looking back all misty eyed on second generation Neons. You could say that the SRT-4 brought back the fun to drive factor, but it was a much faster, much more serious car in a way that the original wasn't intended to be. Unlike the old Neon R/T, the SRT-4 looked downright ricey from the factory. The Protege's never been a car that I've looked at and said "hey, that's cool", but it's also not something I've ever wanted to point and laugh at in the streets. I have a very neutral opinion of it. Neutral's always better than negative, so I'll take the Protege.

1995 Acura Legend LS Coupe (3.2 V6, 230 horsepower, 206 lb-ft, 6-Speed M/T or 4-Speed A/T, ~3500 lbs, FWD)

1995 Lexus SC300 (3.0 I6, 225 horsepower, 210 lb-ft, 5-Speed M/T or 4-Speed A/T, ~3500 lbs, RWD)

1997 Acura CL 3.0 Premium (3.0 V6, 200 horsepower, 195 lb-ft, 4-Speed A/T, ~3200 lbs, FWD)
Lexus SC300
Slashfan
1970 Ford Mustang Boss 302

1969 Chevrolet Camaro RS/SS
'Stang.. 'cause 'Maro is too mainstream.
 
SC300, I just prefer it over the rest. It also has the engine of my favorite car =).

Camaro, I only like 2 model mustangs. The rest are just ugly to me.
 
Legend vs. SC300 vs. 3.2 CL

I like to think of these cars as a sort of more responsible, Japanese take on the American personal coupes of the 1970s. Less heavy, smaller, more efficient, and with a greater emphasis on sport. The CL's not a bad looking car at all, but it just doesn't compare to the clean, classy lines of the Legend that preceded it. The Legend, while not as modern, does look better inside, and does have the benefit of a six(!)-speed manual transmission. For those reasons, the CL is out, because the two door Legend is just a better choice. The Lexus SC is one of my favorite designs, and one of my favorite Lexuses. The sleek, curvy design can still be called modern today, and its interior has aged remarkably well for a car, that in its oldest iteration, is now old enough to buy you a beer. It's not the sportiest coupe out there, but it's a nice, comfortable, quiet personal coupe. Notice I never mentioned the specific SC300, which is why I wouldn't choose this. I'd prefer the brawnier, more powerful V8 SC400, even if the SC300 does indeed have more potential, being a descendant of the 2JZ engine family. But straight out of the box, the SC400's the faster car, and I've always wanted to supe up an SC400 into a sort of loud, proud V8 muscle-luxury coupe. But since the choice here is the SC300, I'll take the Legend.

Boss 302 vs. RS/SS

The 1970 Mustang, while not my favorite of the first generation Mustangs, is still a pretty macho looking car, maybe a little too much so. The Camaro's got the cleaner, simpler lines that just look better compared to the Mustang's busier styling. For that reason alone I'd choose the Camaro. I'm sure it's plenty fast for me.
 
-> ...

1995 Acura Legend LS Coupe (3.2 V6, 230 horsepower, 206 lb-ft, 6-Speed M/T or 4-Speed A/T, ~3500 lbs, FWD)

1995 Lexus SC300 (3.0 I6, 225 horsepower, 210 lb-ft, 5-Speed M/T or 4-Speed A/T, ~3500 lbs, RWD)

1997 Acura CL 3.0 Premium (3.0 V6, 200 horsepower, 195 lb-ft, 4-Speed A/T, ~3200 lbs, FWD)
^ I take both the Legend & the SC300! Two of the '90s JDM greats! The CL is like an after thought inn this comparo.


Would You rather Get a

2013 Dodge Grand Caravan RT.

2013 Chrysler Town & County S
^ Town & Country for sure! Then I'll convert it into a Lancia Voyager to piss people off!

lancia-voyager_1228_1.jpg


lancia-voyager_1228_2.jpg


111019_l_voyager_37.jpg


:sly:
 
There's really no reason you'd take the Dodge over the Chrysler. It's like taking a Crown Victoria over a Lincoln Town Car.
 
Dodge Grand Caravan R/T vs. Chrysler Town & Country S - Aren't these the same car? I'll take the Dodge, I like the styling better.
 
Supposedly the Chrysler model is a bit more luxurious, but that doesn't matter to me in this case. I guess I'll take the Caravan.
 
Toyota. Because it's not a Chrysler. (Yes, I'm aware that the Chrysler is actually a slightly better minivan)
 
Toyota because it's Japanese (I like Japanese cars) and because it has nearly Lexus quality interior (for obvious reasons).
 
Chrysler Town & County S - looks better for me.

These two cost $1,400 each. What would you rather spend this money on?

1985 VW Golf II 1.6D
54 hp, FF, MT, mileage 92,000 km
329b80b2.jpg

f3b2426a.jpg

f443fa74.jpg


or

1982 GAZ 24-02 Volga
100 hp, FR, MT, mileage 68,687 km
424776700.jpg

424776712.jpg

426947916.jpg


The interior condition is... errr... moderate. :crazy:
 
I'd have the GAZ Volga, because it's a car I'm not familiar with, so I find it very interesting. Also, it has much more power, RWD, and more space.
 
Back