Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,097,151 views
Diablo, looks much better than the 512, never really cared for the Testarossa and it's variants. The Diablo also has the old Lambo charm of being hard to drive but, more exciting than the 512 by a mile.
 
RS4:
RS5 Coupe:
S6:
S7:
A8:
I'd take the RS5 out of all those but I'm not entirely sure why.

Okay, would you rather have the Ford Escort RS Cosworth or Audi RS2?

I'll take the Cosworth but leave it completely standard. Any modifications would be a big no-no.


1993 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning 5.8L
vs
1990 Chevrolet Silverado 454 SS 7.5L

Lightning. Hands down.


1990 Lamborghini Diablo

OR

1991 Ferrari 512 TR

Diablo. No explanation required.
 
Diablo vs 512 -
I'm afraid I'm going to have to take the Ferrari. As a little kid, I adored Lamborghinis, especially the Diablo, but I've moved on since then. The Diablo, in my opinion, does not look nearly as good as the 512 and I'm sure won't have as nice of an interior. I think I've recently grown a soft spot to these old Ferraris, to be honest.
And Josh, I love supercars and speed, but the Diablo will be what causes my death, which is not something I want just yet. I'd rather take the still fast but luxurious Ferrari in order to still be able to live.
 
The Ferrari doesn't handle great either, despite the boxer 12 I've read the CG at the rear is still fairly high because its mounted on top of the gearbox.
 
2013 Infiniti JX35 3.5L V6, AWD, MSRP: $42,650
2013_infiniti_jx_4dr-suv_jx35_fq_oem_2_500.jpg


OR

2013 Toyota Sequoia SR5 5.7L V8, RWD, MSRP: $42,455
2013_toyota_sequoia_4dr-suv_sr5_fq_oem_1_500.jpg
 
2013 Infiniti JX35 3.5L V6, AWD, MSRP: $42,650
2013_infiniti_jx_4dr-suv_jx35_fq_oem_2_500.jpg


OR

2013 Toyota Sequoia SR5 5.7L V8, RWD, MSRP: $42,455
2013_toyota_sequoia_4dr-suv_sr5_fq_oem_1_500.jpg

I usually judge a car on more than looks before making a choice, but wow that Toyota is ugly! I just would not be able to bring myself to drive it, no matter how well it handled or how much power it had. A car needs to have character for me to be attracted to it and that car is just a dull people mover, not an entertaining machine.
 
Let's see...

NSX v 355: NSX, specifically an NA1 in red with the black roof. That or a Zanardi edition.
Audis: S7, thanks. The RS4, especially in Avant form, is tempting, but the S7 can pull the classy shuttle use way better than it, with more ample torque thanks to those turbos.
Cossie v RS2: A Porsche-fettled turbo wagon? Easy choice.
90's Supercars: El Diablo.
The I've-Given-Up-On-Fun Choices: The Infiniti, as it's car based and wouldn't ruin my wallet quite as much as the hideous Toyota.
 
Okay, here's my next one:

Mercedes-Benz C 63 AMG Coupe or BMW M3 e92 Coupe

For me, it would be the BMW. I love BMW cars.

Mercedes_Benz-C63_AMG_Coupe_mp35_pic_84570.jpg


2013bmwm3coupelimerock-05.jpg
 
Last edited:
Infiniti JX35 vs. Toyota Sequoia SR5 - JX35 by a mile.

Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG vs. BMW M3 - C63, the E92 is kind of boring. The E90 I don't mind, though.
 
@SlipZtrEm, come on man I thought it would be a good idea to mix things up...lol

Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG vs. BMW M3

Battle of the German muscle cars. I like both cars but I'd rather have the C63 AMG (even if it were the sedan). Nothing against the M3 but I feel like the C63 has more personality (if a car can actually have one)... lol
 
I personally don't care for either of those SUVS and I would probably have Ford Explorer, BMW X5, or a Range Rover if I even considered buying a SUV. If I had to choose from those 2 though; it would be the infiniti.
 
Last edited:
@SlipZtrEm, come on man I thought it would be a good idea to mix things up...lol

Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG vs. BMW M3

Battle of the German muscle cars. I like both cars but I'd rather have the C63 AMG (even if it were the sedan). Nothing against the M3 but I feel like the C63 has more personality (if a car can actually have one)... lol

The people who buy the M3 expecting a muscle car really should have bought a C63, as the M3 has less torque than a 335, but oh how fun it is to get it up in the rev range
 
Xavier2342
2013 Infiniti JX35 3.5L V6, AWD, MSRP: $42,650

OR

2013 Toyota Sequoia SR5 5.7L V8, RWD, MSRP: $42,455
Infiniti
RandomCarGuy17
Okay, here's my next one:

Mercedes-Benz C 63 AMG Coupe or BMW M3 e92 Coupe

For me, it would be the BMW. I love BMW cars.
As much as I love that E92, I'll go with the C63 for torque....

Here's one,

BMW S1000RR HP4

03-s1000rr-hp4.jpg


Or

Ducati 1199 Panigale S Tricolore

ducati-1199-panigale-s-tricolore-eicma-16.jpg
 
Last edited:
Ford Escort RS Cosworth vs. Audi RS2: As much as i love Audis, i would still choose the Cossie.


1993 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning 5.8L vs. 1990 Chevrolet Silverado 454 SS 7.5L: Hmm, this one is pretty hard....i think i would take the Chevrolet.
Those 454 SS trucks are a complete joke stock super slow, I used to beat them with a stock 96 Mustang GT convertible in automatic, yep one of the slowest modern mustangs and it would MURDER those trucks. The Lightning was a way better all around performance package.
 
motortrend
I couldn't handle any of those two but if I could I'd probably go with the beemer

Good choice... the Beemer has semi-active suspension, which means you won't be s:censored:g your pants during the whole ride.
 
SUVs: I'll have the Infiniti JX.

C63 AMG W204 vs. M3 E92: Tough choice here, since they are my favorite...I'll take the C63, because AMG. ;)
 
Bopop4
P-P-P-Panigale.

A BMW vs THE flagship Ducati. There is a tricolore at the local KTM/Ducati dealership, and it is a work of art. It also sounds insane as well.

It could also enter more classes at the track. :lol:

True, true... BUT, does the Panigale have a semi-active suspension system? With four settings: rain, road, sport, and slick? That is why I prefer the '13 S1000RR over the '12 S1000RR and the '13 1199 Panigale.
 
C 63 AMG vs M3 E92 -
Oooh, I am so glad this exact comparo came up. The C 63 AMG has been and will always be in my top 5 cars, so there is no competition here. In my opinion, it beats the M3 in everything, from looks, to sound, to power, to torque and it looks like it would dish out plenty of fun while you drive it. It is also tuned by AMG, my favourite tuning company bar none, so the "M" tuned BMW could never compare.

BMW Bike vs Ducati Bike -
I know nothing about bikes, but I'm glad that the BMW has semi-active suspension 👍. I prefer the looks of the BMW to the Ducati, but only slightly. Also, I've always been intrigued by BMW's bikes, so I think I would choose it over the Ducati. The Ducati may be able to enter more track events, but I think I would be scared :censored:less if I ever got it above 80mph, so I couldn't really care less about track competitions in bikes.
 

Latest Posts

Back