Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,099,198 views
Chevrolet Corvair vs. Volkswagen Karmann Ghia - Ghia, way too easy.

Results:
1. Volkswagen Karmann Ghia
2. Chevrolet Corvair
___
The Audi RS4 won the previous comparo.

2008 Audi RS4
Audi_rs4.jpg


vs.

2012 BMW M3 (E92)
BMW_M3_E92_02_China_2012-04-15.jpg
 
Karmann Ghia and M3, please. The RS4 looks much better, I have to say, and the M3 is quite common around here. But there's a reason for that...
 
RS4 vs M3 - Sorry but I don't have a love for BMWs, unlike the majority of car enthusiasts. Audis have always interested me, though, and the RS4 is no exception. I'd prefer an RS5, of course, but the RS4 is not a bad car. I'll take the RS4 in either silver or blue, I'm still deciding :lol:
 
BMW M3 e92 Coupe for me; 1; I already declared that I love BMWs more than the other German manufactures. 2; It's the faster car around the track and drag strip. 3; I prefer the look of it.
 
The E92 M3 has always been the car I remember most for being the best experience behind the wheel I've ever had. Granted, I haven't driven the B7 RS4 but I can imagine that it isn't quite up to snuff as the M3. So I will take the BMW.
 
I'll take James Dean's Porsche 550, but I would have to do some mods to it so it doesn't try to kill me.
 
Last edited:
Custom878
Chevrolet Camaro

or

Ford Mustang

I'll take the Camaro, because ghost car.

The Camaro easily.

I actually almost bought one two years ago from Ebay Motors. It was red (Iroc-Z version). Only had 29k miles (if I remember correctly). Perfect condition too. Only reason I didn't get it was because my loan didn't come through till the next day.

It sold for 3,400, my loan was for 3,600. So I was a little upset.
 
M3 (don't fool yourself)

Porsche (despite the curse, the classic roadster).

Ferrari 250 Lusso.
The Jag was a racer that couldn't sell, the ferrari was the best of it's kind.
On top of all that...

Rock star Eric Clapton owned one, and an example that had been owned by Steve McQueen was sold at auction for $2.3 million on 16 August 2007.

Wikipedia.

Sorry but Clapton and McQueen. :bowdown:

Basically Zeus and Jesus decided to buy the same car.
Meanwhile you are asking what's the better pick? :lol:


:sly:
 
Jaguar, the curves are astonishing. Plus it's got a real racecar vibe to it, the Lusso seems more like a GT.

Really?
The Ferrari is a race car.
The Jag...
A race car bad enough that at the time Jag couldn't sell them all.
Likewise, "GT" isn't a bad thing. GT means it carries two and the luggage for both.

Pictures can make all the difference.
What if the 250 was this?

1962_ferrari_250_gto-pic-49027.jpeg


or this...

01-ferrari-250-gt-swb-rm-2012.jpg


The 250 was the heart of many variants because it genuinely was an epic car- the jag wasn't.

There is a reason for this...
pdvd_318.2.jpg
 
Ferrari 250 Lusso, and the 250 GTO, I think the replica that he drove was converted to a Automatic because he couldn't drive a manual.
 
Really?
The Ferrari is a race car.
The Jag...
A race car bad enough that at the time Jag couldn't sell them all.
Likewise, "GT" isn't a bad thing. GT means it carries two and the luggage for both.

Pictures can make all the difference.
What if the 250 was this?

or this...

The 250 was the heart of many variants because it genuinely was an epic car- the jag wasn't.

There is a reason for this...

Calm your opinionated tits.

1) Im only saying the Jag looks racier than the Ferrari to my eyes, courtesy of a lower, swoopier body.

2) I know what the term GT means and never said it was bad.

3) I just prefer the Jaguar.

4) Im going by that variant of the 250 because that's what he posted. Problem?

So why are you so insistently defensive? Go shove your opinion down someone else's throat.

Don't get ticked off just because someone chooses something different otherwise this isn't the place for you.
 
Calm your opinionated tits.

1) Im only saying the Jag looks racier than the Ferrari to my eyes, courtesy of a lower, swoopier body.

2) I know what the term GT means and never said it was bad.

3) I just prefer the Jaguar.

4) Im going by that variant of the 250 because that's what he posted. Problem?

So why are you so insistently defensive? Go shove your opinion down someone else's throat.

Don't get ticked off just because someone chooses something different otherwise this isn't the place for you.

:lol: You have a point.
 
Someone in the GT6 wishlist thread did the same thing to me. :lol:
I had an opinion on the car and I got responded with a lot of links and text in order for the guy to prove me otherwise.

Anyway, I'll also pick the Jaguar.
 
Calm your opinionated tits.

1) Im only saying the Jag looks racier than the Ferrari to my eyes, courtesy of a lower, swoopier body.

2) I know what the term GT means and never said it was bad.

3) I just prefer the Jaguar.

4) Im going by that variant of the 250 because that's what he posted. Problem?

So why are you so insistently defensive? Go shove your opinion down someone else's throat.

Don't get ticked off just because someone chooses something different otherwise this isn't the place for you.

So you think that's an appropriate response simply because I posted a few pictures and mentioned that the Jag wasn't a good seller. Figured the pictures would be well received honestly.
That said, it seems to me you are the one who's acting nasty about the whole thing.
Fact is, if you can't handle someone disagreeing with you this might not be the place for you. :dunce:
 
Kent
So you think that's an appropriate response simply because I posted a few pictures and mentioned that the Jag was such a bad racer they couldn't sell them all. Figured the pictures would be well received honestly.
That said, it seems to me you are the one who's acting nasty about the whole thing.
Fact is, if you can't handle someone disagreeing with you this might not be the place for you. :dunce:

I'm sorry, but that is the most hypercritical thing you could have possibly said.. just try to keep the arguing to a minimum, guys.... everyone is entitled to their own opinion, even if you highly disagree.
 
Back