- 4,578

- Houston, TX
- astrosdude91
Click of the heels!
should have pitted right after Vettel came out in front of him.
The bloody chap should've been penalized for weaving over the track at least 3 times when Petrov was challenging him. The rules clearly state that weaving will be penalized with a drive-through penalty.
Lol, did you guys see Vettel signal that he would start champagne? It looked like he was wanking it.![]()
The bloody chap should've been penalized for weaving over the track at least 3 times when Petrov was challenging him. The rules clearly state that weaving will be penalized with a drive-through penalty.
Ferrari_TifosoMaybe some of you should remove your anti-rosso glasses.
I mean, three blown engines and one buggered gearbox. LOL at Ferrari reliability one one one one.
I agree, Hamilton should've been penalized, that was evident illegal weaving
FamineYou're allowed one move when challenging for position or in a braking zone. Hamilton wasn't doing either. But it was extremely naughty of him and most unsportsmanlike.
astrosdude - What's with all the double-posting? I mean, really. For a start, we're all watching the race with professional sports commentators, so another one is kinda redundant, but if you're going to go ahead with it anyway EDIT YOUR POSTS.
What was the issue with Schuey's car boys??
My bad Famine, I was just getting excited! Won't happen again.
👍
For reference, though I think your commentary is redundant, that's not an instruction not to do it again. There's nothing in the AUP that says you shouldn't do it and, as a moderator, I'd neither suggest nor insist that you do. If you like doing it, you keep right on doing it.
Wheel nut failure. Not as in "wasn't done up properly and fell off" - this was before the pitstops. It failed. Literally.
You're allowed one move when challenging for position
A rule that he clearly broke.
Petrov wasn't challenging him for position. He was behind, having just been passed and not gaining on Hamilton. Hamilton's moves were intended to break the slipstream and not block a pass - which is the intent of the rule.
i hate vettel
i hate vettel
Ignore this comment. I got graped by one of my stupid friends!
Hamilton's moves were intended to break the slipstream and not block a pass - which is the intent of the rule.
But it was very rude, very unsportsmanlike and very unnecessary. Your car is faster, make it stick.