- 5,204
- Finland
It was stop and go.Except this wasn't a stop 'n go.
It was stop and go.Except this wasn't a stop 'n go.
it's meant to be an extended pit stop as a minor penalty so yes its appropriate.A stop and go penalty of 5 seconds translates into just 5 seconds on the track if ignored. Seems appropriate. Good job F1 👎.
Read the rules.A stop and go penalty of 5 seconds translates into just 5 seconds on the track if ignored. Seems appropriate. Good job F1 👎.
Not in the sense you mean.It was stop and go.
Read the rules.
A 5 second penalty gets taken at the driver's next pitstop. The driver stops, 5 seconds is timed, then they can change tyres or whatever they need to do. If the driver does not stop again, 5 seconds is added to his time.
I understand it was 5 seconds longer pit stop penalty, but race officials call it as a stop and go penalty.Not in the sense you mean.
Here's F1 official rule about this, which is the "a" scenario:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
16.3 The stewards may impose any one of the penalties below on any driver involved in an
Incident:
a) A five second time penalty. The driver must enter the pit lane, stop at his pit for at least
five seconds and then re-join the race. The relevant driver may however elect not to
stop, provided he carries out no further pit stop before the end of the race. In such
cases five seconds will be added to the elapsed race time of the driver concerned.
b) A drive-through penalty. The driver must enter the pit lane and re-join the race without
stopping.
c) A ten second time penalty. The driver must enter the pit lane, stop at his pit for at least
ten seconds and then re-join the race.
If either of the three penalties above are imposed during the last three laps, or after the end
of a race, Article 16.4b) below will not apply and five seconds will be added to the elapsed
race time of the driver concerned in the case of a) above, 20 seconds in the case of b) and 30
seconds in the case of c).
d) A time penalty.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
10 second stop & go still exists, but they seem to prefer the 5 second one as it's not as severe. It also means that 5 seconds is 5 seconds, instead of the possible 30 seconds* lost from a "10" second penalty.Thank you for the clarification. I assumed it was similar to other racing S/G's.
There's a reason Montoya calls the FIA "Ferrari Internal Affairs".The FIA really needs to stop with this bias towards Ferrari. Alonso gained an advantage at the first corner, but he got no penalty. Vergne was getting pushed wide, and he got penalties.
And the media called it the Ferrari International Assistance after Spa 2008.There's a reason Montoya calls the FIA "Ferrari Internal Affairs".
I too think the Vergne penalty was hard (a very similar case than Massa-Grosjean on Hungaroring last year ).The FIA really needs to stop with this bias towards Ferrari. Alonso gained an advantage at the first corner, but he got no penalty. Vergne was getting pushed wide, and he got penalties.
It's just Vergne, last e has to almost be ignored when saying it.DOTD is Jean Eric Vergné. I hope he gets a drive next year.
Was absolutely gutted for Rosberg when he came off those jacks and the clutch simply wouldn't engage. In a championship this close, you don't want gremlins to decide it. Really thought he'd do another gung ho job of it and bring the car in for some points.
Also... Forza Alonso! Gotta feel for Seb... he's doing great in wheel-to-wheel battles, but he simply can't seem to keep up the pace over race distance.
Good scrap between the RBRs and Alonso... shame about Nico's weekend... I really wanted to see a scrap on track.
Autosport saying that Magnussen has had to go to the medical center due to burns sustained during the Grand Prix.
I imagine it would have been an improvement from previous GPs but Alonso was only 4th even with his controversial start.I can't stop thinking what would Raikkonen done, if he had no trouble in Q3.