2016 NASCAR Discussion ThreadNASCAR 

  • Thread starter Thread starter MustangRyan
  • 10,093 comments
  • 427,198 views
I think my biggest problem with Gen 6 in general is that the aerodynamics are far to uniform and impactful, the splitter should be removed, and the spoiler needs to be adjustable
 


Will be a primary at Atlanta and The dover chase race

EDIT:

Screenshot_2016-01-12-16-05-27-1.png


Screenshot_2016-01-12-16-06-22-1.png
 
Last edited:
Ricky Stenhouse will put it to good use as a crash test dummy.

No wonder they simplified the nose. They had to remake so many of them, they figured they could get them out for Ricky to crash with quicker by making it simpler and cost effective!
 
Engines are the same. Chassis setups are not.

If this new nose provides better downforce/aero, it could help RFR gain speed.

If we're honest, there is a lot more things needed for RFR to gain speed.

The question is, if the new nose does help them, can any of the drivers actually put it to good use?

I'm positive only Penske's drivers may put it to any use.
 
http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/rockingham-speedway-could-turn-center-veterans/njrT7/
http://yourdailyjournal.com/top-stories/20663/rockingham-speedway-plans-accelerating

That track needs a lot of work to get back into proper racing condition. I just don't see how it's going to happen.

Edit: Apparently, Rico Abreu will be in the #98 for Thorsport Racing in the CWTS.
What did they do to the track before the trucks visited for a year besides adding safer barrier? That seems like a huge waste of money now considering only one race was held...
 
The gold number just kinda blends in. I can barely see it. It may be alright when the lights reflect off it during night races (if he runs the scheme at any night races), but otherwise it's just ehh.
 
I actually don't mind the livery. The gold numbers are completely terrible in every way though. Who in their right mind thought that was a good idea? :yuck:
 
Back