- 9,554

- Vermont
- catamount39
I love it!
It's insane, and it got rid of the fugly sidepods!

Literally 2nd to top thread.Don't see a 2015 thread yet
I really like the new aero kits (bar the rear wheel covers being attached to the rear wing), just wondering though, do all Chevy teams have to use the same kit or do the teams get to fine tune/change some of the parts?
Chevrolet renderings of road/street aero kit
![]()
Sorry for not updating GT Planet's IndyCar thread. I've been busy with work, school, family, and training.
I've updated the first post with this year's schedule and the new 2015 Chevrolet IndyCar! Now we wait for the new 2015 Honda IndyCar. We also have their new speedway aero kits to look forward to in May. And as a gamer and sim racer, I also hope we get to race these new IndyCars in Forza Motorsport 6 and Gran Turismo 7.
Don't forget that Project Cars has the 2015 Indianapolis 500 license that includes all cars and drivers of the 2015 season
Here is more information if you or anyone else is interested:
http://www.wmdportal.com/projectnews/experience-the-indianapolis-500-in-project-cars/
But this thread has been GT Planet's official IndyCar thread since 2006.But we have this thread already established...
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/threads/2015-indycar-series.319052/

If he was proven innocent, then there shouldn't be an issue.Even if he did get a license to race in Indycar, I can't think of a single team owner that would want to court the bad publicity Kurt could bring to each race weekend, news report or series article.
He wasn't proven innocent.If he was proven innocent, then there shouldn't be an issue.
He wasn't proven innocent.
It wasn't a criminal case.. there was no guilty/innocent, just "did he do it" or "did he not" and with the evidence the court had, it leaned towards "he did it".He wasn't proven guilty either, which is what is supposed to happen.
It wasn't a criminal case.. there was no guilty/innocent, just "did he do it" or "did he not" and with the evidence the court had, it leaned towards "he did it".
It wasn't a criminal case.. there was no guilty/innocent, just "did he do it" or "did he not" and with the evidence the court had, it leaned towards "he did it".
It still doesn't change the fact they didn't prove he was guilty though, which makes me think this suspension is rather harsh.