- 33,150

- Hammerhead Garage
It's too long, but it would be pretty easy to shorten it by turning left at the war memorial and rejoining at the top of the Esplanade Bridge.The Singapore circuit doesn't look half bad during sunset.
It's too long, but it would be pretty easy to shorten it by turning left at the war memorial and rejoining at the top of the Esplanade Bridge.The Singapore circuit doesn't look half bad during sunset.
It keeps the first corner and the end of Raffles Boulevard, but it removes the one at the top of the Esplanade Bridge. If the chicane under the grandstand could be removed, it could create an extra opportunity into the final complex.As long as those passing opportunities remain, I think it could work.
They were introduced too late to make a 2017 start viable.the new car regs have (for now) have failed completely to attract new manufacturers (barring Nissan)
Because they're boring. I seriously doubt NGTC cars could survive a race as long as ours - we do more racing in a single race than the BTCC does in an entire meeting.So why not switch to a tweaked version of the NGTC formula?
Especially in endurance races. Bathurst is around 7 Hours normally, I can't imagine how long it would be with slower cars.NGTC is a good regulation but I don't think people here would accept cars losing that much speed.
I don't think the series is dying, it's just manufacturer interest is, next Year is a new regulation though so i would wait to see how that goes first.
NGTC is a good regulation but I don't think people here would accept cars losing that much speed.
Another problem is the Australian market. Don't think many manufacturer companies who weren't interested before would suddenly be interested in making cars for Australian racing.
Especially in endurance races. Bathurst is around 7 Hours normally, I can't imagine how long it would be with slower cars.
They were introduced too late to make a 2017 start viable.
Because they're boring. I seriously doubt NGTC cars could survive a race as long as ours - we do more racing in a single race than the BTCC does in an entire meeting.
About a little quicker than Super Tourers?
The Group A cars were doing 2minute 13s at Bathurst. 6hours 20minutes.
VASC can do 2m 5s.
MARC Cars would be the closest to a VASC program. Any engine can fit and any body shape.
Wouldn't bigger engines just increase the weight of the car making it redundant?Hence why I said allow bigger engines. Cars are slightly lighter as well under those regs so improving tyre wear and cornering speed and Super Tourers raced at Bathurst....
Wouldn't bigger engines just increase the weight of the car making it redundant?
No, I obviously don't watch the series anymore if I think it's boring. The races are over before they have even had a chance to begin.you obviously don't watch the series if you think it is boring
I'm surprised as well. Runs good at the 12H when it's not punted into the dirt.I've discussed with fellow aussies as well, MARC goes down well there certainly. Surprised that hasn't taken off more in all honestly.
No, I obviously don't watch the series anymore if I think it's boring. The races are over before they have even had a chance to begin.
I'm surprised as well. Runs good at the 12H when it's not punted into the dirt.
It would certainly be a stepping stone below the DVS and side by side with Carrera Cup. Could be a fork in the road to go Supercars or GT racing.
It's hard to say V8s are dying when only Volvo is leaving and the 2 cars they have will be replaced by 2 other cars.
with the more open regulation next year I suspect more manufacturers will be interested.
In terms of manufacturer competition, the current regulations have been a failure. This was promoted as the end of the era of Holden vs. Ford, however it sure doesn't feel like it with only 1 Volvo threat and the rest aren't putting any challenges to the current 2 rulers.
The "problem" is the 20 year head start Holden and Ford have had.In terms of manufacturer competition, the current regulations have been a failure. This was promoted as the end of the era of Holden vs. Ford, however it sure doesn't feel like it with only 1 Volvo threat and the rest aren't putting any challenges to the current 2 rulers.
That's because last regulation pretty much banned any manufacturer outside Holden and Ford.we had more manufactures with it than before it.
IMO, it'll depend if they can keep up with Holden and Ford once Gen2 hits. If they don't then I don't see any other manufacturers wishing to join in the competition.I think Nissan with the Super Girls team feels they can promote more interest and PR outside of the Aussie domestic market with their cars.
Right, because the amount of overtaking is the only measure of quality racing.That is no way related to on track overtaking.
That's because last regulation pretty much banned any manufacturer outside Holden and Ford.
IMO, it'll depend if they can keep up with Holden and Ford once Gen2 hits. If they don't then I don't see any other manufacturers wishing to join in the competition.
Volvo was probably the best pioneer but they absolutely won't be any help anymore.