AMG VGT PD getting lazy ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghostrider135
  • 132 comments
  • 9,352 views
And the 4-series has been out for a while so it's not like the M4 cockpit will be much different save for a few tacky M-badges.

Anyway, as pointed out PD will probably get round to updating it all. They came good on GT5 eventually.
 
SPORTVAN
It is possible to model from your imagination.. most 3d guys will model from pictures including sketches.. if your good with 3D
Click to expand...

Then you get the results that Forza gets! lol, PD model to perfection using original CAD data. (recently anyway)
 
the question is : they are spending their time modeling cars that even have a interior view ! it is like creating standard cars. a waste of time !
 
The next VGT Should be lump of clay. At least it will be an accurate model of a concept car in pre concept form.
 
LMSCorvetteGT2
As I said though who knows exactly, it could be they are lazy or extremely busy when it comes to this, I really can't pick sides based on the info. However with that said I am disappointed, when we all heard these specialized cars exclusive to this game were coming I'm sure many thought they'd be fully detailed in and out.
Click to expand...
I was referring to Mercedes, not Polyphony. If people say the interior isn't finished yet in the real model, PD has not fault.
 
Snake1405
I was referring to Mercedes, not Polyphony. If people say the interior isn't finished yet in the real model, PD has not fault.
Click to expand...

It's still not an excuse considering they've had fictional cars done by themselves without an outside company as far as we know and they had an interior though perhaps not functional.
 
I don't why get butthurt over the fact that it does not have an interior. But I think they did not "bother" modelling it since maybe the designers told them that they are working on a proper interior. So why should PD model an interior to the car that could possibly not even be the final/real interior?

Bacuse it would be waste of time say I.

The interior Freeman_Cruz posted on first page is most likely a sketch/design the designers gave PD to put there to give an idea how it could possibly look once finished.

/thread.
 
LMSCorvetteGT2
It's still not an excuse considering they've had fictional cars done by themselves without an outside company as far as we know and they had an interior though perhaps not functional.
Click to expand...
What cars? In GT5?

I'm still thinking that an interior like the drawing is asking too much to PD.
 
Snake1405
What cars? In GT5?

I'm still thinking that an interior like the drawing is asking too much to PD.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure we're talking about GT6, and GT5 had all the open top cars with a non functioning interior for example the GT40 and so on. Then you bring in the cars that were their own design e.g. FGT, it's quite the cop out to say that the task to design an interior is too much for them. Considering the other things they've been able to design and what not outside of GT, and yet they can't make a single interior on their own. Hell I can do that with freakin auto cad in a a couple days and so could many other on here...it's a bit insulting to say it's too much to ask.
 
jimipitbull
If you don't like it, don't drive it.

I blame the parents who raised all these whiners and criers.
Click to expand...

I'm probably older than you for one, the cop out comments that you continually make aren't needed and you might want to read the AUP if all you plan to do is non-contributory comments.

Sorry that the bubble of your fragile world is being poked though, and if you really want to be brave, quote me or tag me so I can't promptly respond to you.
 
Laziness no. Oversight or rushed to get it out and left some holes in things; Yes! Made concious effort to just get it out and update with patches when those things are ready; YES! My beef with that? I think the GT fans who play the game can live with it. I think as big as they've made this VISION thing (I think it's great) you GOTTA come with your A game for them if you want them to continue doing it in the future. I think PD should be highly embarrased and the manufacturers a little ticked off that the (curent) two jewls of the game have been made the focal point of a laughable glitch (20 mil glitch). That being the AMG VST and the BMW M4.
 
LMSCorvetteGT2
I'm probably older than you for one, the cop out comments that you continually make aren't needed and you might want to read the AUP if all you plan to do is non-contributory comments.

Sorry that the bubble of your fragile world is being poked though, and if you really want to be brave, quote me or tag me so I can't promptly respond to you.
Click to expand...

What has your age got to do with any of this? Not sure about this bubble you speak of, please elaborate.
 
Falango
I don't even think the real version has a motor. Can't imagine what the OP would rant on about if the game version was missing that. Take your pick I guess.



People are whining about the M4 as well in terms of the interior. Guess what? You JUST got a car in a game that the public won't be able to drive for at least another 6 months, and it was revealed in game as it was revealed to the public. Exactly what part of that isn't good enough?
Click to expand...

We got an interior in the C7. Both in the masked version and the final prototype.
 
jimipitbull
What has your age got to do with any of this? Not sure about this bubble you speak of, please elaborate.
Click to expand...

The bubble that GT is infallible and it's sacrilege to say otherwise, or challenging the dogma of GT. Also you talk about parent's raising people as if they are still kids so...
 
I promise you, PD didn't build the body off of sketches - sketches are not the final idea. They are VERY early parts of a design, far from final.

Make an analogy to this BMW concept, taken from a 4-year old child:

bmw-four-year.jpg


This was model made in-house by BMW, from a sketch by a 4-year old, one of the company's designers' children. MB wouldn't just hand PD their first-draft drawings, they'd finalize it, and give something more akin to this design to PD, who would only then get involved with the project - I don't really see how else they'd do it. Otherwise, it'd be a joint project, like what Subaru and Toyota (Toyobaru) have been doing, and (unless I'm mistaken somewhere), the "GT Vision" name wouldn't make as much sense...

I'm pretty sure MB would have designed an official full 3-D model before having PD get their hands on it. So it really isn't PD's fault if MB didn't send/didn't build full schematics for the interior. In fact, as many have said, MB may not have wanted PD to even do an interior, as it is a concept car, which, to my knowledge, is supposed to be something made up of pure creativity, with no physical limitations. Often the interior would be seen as unimportant - I believe there have been concepts and designs where people have no way to get into or even fit into the vehicle at hand.
 
You guys do realize that the person who made this topic has not made one single post in it since he created it, right? It's textbook baiting and you've all been nibbling on the hook. Make topic with ridiculous claim and/or controversial subject, sit back and enjoy the show. Should have been pretty obvious.
 
Broseph
You guys do realize that the person who made this topic has not made one single post in it since he created it, right? It's textbook baiting and you've all been nibbling on the hook. Make topic with ridiculous claim and/or controversial subject, sit back and enjoy the show. Should have been pretty obvious.
Click to expand...

Baiting huh that's a new one on me, The topic is aimed to get people talking, Now for whatever reason it is that the car isn't complete I don't claim to know but hey atleast by creating the topic I had something to say on the subject, Unlike yourself who decides to post but has the sweet sum of bugger all to add to the discussion.
 
Last edited:
Broseph
You guys do realize that the person who made this topic has not made one single post in it since he created it, right? It's textbook baiting and you've all been nibbling on the hook. Make topic with ridiculous claim and/or controversial subject, sit back and enjoy the show. Should have been pretty obvious.
Click to expand...

Some of us do tend to just discuss just because we want to, we didn't join up because of a potential troll. Someone else would have done this for legitimate reasons or not other than the OP, hell how do we know you're not the OP under a different name just trying to fan the flames. Trust me people don't care who the OP is or what the arguments will happen and the troll will go unnoticed or not cared for, but good try.
 
The M4 is getting an interior very soon. There are constant updates to the game, every few days in fact. What is not to say the same will happen with the Merc VGT? They have a lot of other VGT cars to work on. Would you not rather they release them when they can and then wait a week or two for them to implement an interior?
 
LMSCorvetteGT2
The bubble that GT is infallible and it's sacrilege to say otherwise, or challenging the dogma of GT. Also you talk about parent's raising people as if they are still kids so
Click to expand...

Constructive criticism is fine. Barking dogma over non issues is hardly constructive.
 
jimipitbull
Constructive criticism is fine. Barking dogma over non issues is hardly constructive.
Click to expand...

And who made you moral arbiter of what is constructive and not in regards to what PD does? Because it's funny how you say this yet the double standard is every comment for you is non-constructive. This to you may be a non-issue, but to others it isn't. Also if you read my earlier comments you'd know that I wasn't whinging but you don't do that you just shoot from the hip.

Simply trying to defend and say PD can't possibly do this (the other users), doesn't sound realistic to all the great stuff people say PD can do.
 
LMSCorvetteGT2
And who made you moral arbiter of what is constructive and not in regards to what PD does? Because it's funny how you say this yet the double standard is every comment for you is non-constructive. This to you may be a non-issue, but to others it isn't. Also if you read my earlier comments you'd know that I wasn't whinging but you don't do that you just shoot from the hip.

Simply trying to defend and say PD can't possibly do this (the other users), doesn't sound realistic to all the great stuff people say PD can do.
Click to expand...

The constructive part was where I said if you don't like it, don't drive it. It was the first line of my first post in this thread.

Quite ironic, that you call me out for not reading posts. Can you quote the part where I defend PD?
 
This remains a non issue since they can always update the car once an actual interior is available.

Obviously Mercedes-Benz agreed to have the car like this, so i don't see why people need to be bothered by this. I'd rather have the car then not have it...
 
jimipitbull
The constructive part was where I said if you don't like it, don't drive it. It was the first line of my first post in this thread.

Quite ironic, that you call me out for not reading posts. Can you quote the part where I defend PD?
Click to expand...

If telling someone "don't like it don't drive it" is supposed to be constructive I'd hate to hear what the opposite of that is, That's like saying "don't like a prostate exam don't have it" we all know where that can get you.
 
jimipitbull
The constructive part was where I said if you don't like it, don't drive it. It was the first line of my first post in this thread.

Quite ironic, that you call me out for not reading posts. Can you quote the part where I defend PD?
Click to expand...

Which thread would you like me to do, or do you claim that speaking out against all negative things toward PD isn't defending, since you don't specifically say it. I guess it isn't alluded to or that doesn't exist. Since that is what I was talking about, basically calling out about it on the forum in general not this thread but you've seemed to let that slip past.

So your bit of irony toward me was misinterpreted and limited to this thread which isn't what I was talking about.
 
ghostrider135
If telling someone "don't like it don't drive it" is supposed to be constructive I'd hate to hear what the opposite of that is, That's like saying "don't like a prostate exam don't have it" we all know where that can get you.
Click to expand...

Offering an alternative solution to someone's perceived issue. That is being constructive. The opposite of that would be destructive......

LMSCorvetteGT2
Which thread would you like me to do, or do you claim that speaking out against all negative things toward PD isn't defending, since you don't specifically say it. I guess it isn't alluded to or that doesn't exist. Since that is what I was talking about, basically calling out about it on the forum in general not this thread but you've seemed to let that slip past.

So your bit of irony toward me was misinterpreted and limited to this thread which isn't what I was talking about.
Click to expand...

Shifting the goal posts doesn't reduce the irony. I think responding to the post(s) that you quote is preferable, makes it easier for the people playing along at home to follow.
 
jimipitbull
Shifting the goal posts doesn't reduce the irony. I think responding to the post(s) that you quote is preferable, makes it easier for the people playing along at home to follow.
Click to expand...

How did I move the goal post the post originally implied that you normally defend GT through out the forum you construed it to this thread alone. now you're pushing it because it's easier to say this one time perhaps you weren't - though you are based on what you usually do- only to save face.

Point is this doesn't change the fact that rushed products are obviously going to produce negativity.
 

Latest Posts

Back