- 525
- Brazil
Assetto Corsa PC Mods General DiscussionPC
- Thread starter Paiky
- 134,759 comments
- 35,718,911 views
- 146
- Canada
It's release Friday again!
IMOLA 1972 release (only here)
This track was made by Reiza for Automobilista. It was converted to Assetto Corsa by Terra21. Later is was updated by third. This is a overhaul done by Rainmaker in 2024.
v2.0 changelog:
-shader overhaul
-new loading screens
-new AI
-fixed trees
-new UI and data
-new overlays for Time Attack mode
-fixed double sided objects
-added new sections file by Fanapryde
-added vintage spectators
-deleted some double objects that made mismatches
-debug for key objects
-fixed some lods
-moved spectators on pit building to correct position
-added geo location
-fixed walls
-fixed some normals
-wider starting grid for better starts
-added option to removed 2d crowds: open the ext_config.ini in the extension folder scroll down to last ";remove 2d crowds" and set ACTIVE = 1
Get always the latest version here:
Imola 1972 v2.1 by Rainmaker
MediaFire is a simple to use free service that lets you put all your photos, documents, music, and video in a single place so you can access them anywhere and share them everywhere.www.mediafire.com
View attachment 1345874
View attachment 1345875
View attachment 1345876
For some reason I can run with only one opponent.. it doesn't matter if I try race, weekend or trackday. Is this a known limit right now?
- 143
- Italy
Hi, for 2008 the textures of the internal views could also be improved; many sponsors seen from the inside seem grainy and even the internal labels...maybe even reach the 2007 level...thank you always for your workYeah + updated shaders and mclaren
No it isn't, but depending on how things goes, we might have a big surprise for the 2008 mod
- 409
- Pizza
Speaking of showrooms, does anyone know if there is something similar, if not this one, for AC?
- 1,180
- Arrakis
I'd also like to see that De Tomaso Mangusta in my AC garage!
- 108
- United States
@Teddie Nice job figuring it out independently...I needed a lot of help.
Glad it also fixed your TAA issue. Specifying ALPHA_BLEND may not be necessary; the key, I think, is just ensuring that the shader for the internal glass is ksWindscreen.I know exactly what you're talking about with the frameless windscreens that are so clear they just "disappear." I've just been messing with some properties to see if I could come up with something, but no luck. But I'm no modder...I'm sure somebody on here could put their finger on the solution pretty easily.
- 745
- United States
Totally appreciate you taking a stab at it, brother. If I find a solution to the 'tinting' thing, I'll definitely share it with you.@Teddie Nice job figuring it out independently...I needed a lot of help.
I know exactly what you're talking about with the frameless windscreens that are so clear they just "disappear." I've just been messing with some properties to see if I could come up with something, but no luck. But I'm no modder...I'm sure somebody on here could put their finger on the solution pretty easily.
- 18
- United Kingdom
Looks exactly like Ex Mods Peugeot CD SP66, i would assume you used the free 3d model on the internet for it.?
Either way Ex Mods has some questionable Physics from what i've heard, if you could fix that it would be sick to see, or a short tail version of the car would be cool too
Last edited:
- 1,385
- Sherbrooke, Québec,
- MastrFocus
- 2
- United States
love the mod! but is there a addon mod for this that add realistic ai and car performances....really ruins the emersion when lotus or those lower teams battle for a top 5/win...thanks!
- 21
- United States
With the recent release of the '88 Corvette GTP, was there ever an '88 GTP version of the 962c? Specifically with the big rear decklid scoop and front "dive planes"? With the Corvette addition to the Nissan GTP, and some XJR-9s, there is almost a full high quality 1988 IMSA GTP grid. Would still love to see the PCARS2 Castrol high downforce Jaguar XJR-9 make it over to AC
https://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1988/Road_America-1988-07-17-014.jpg
https://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1988/Watkins_Glen-1988-07-03-086.jpg
https://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1988/Road_America-1988-07-17-014.jpg
https://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1988/Watkins_Glen-1988-07-03-086.jpg
Last edited:
- 256
- Germany
- 900
- Montserrat
I converted it from GTR2 eons ago but yeah, being a GTR2 model it looks like peepeepoopoo.
All I have are those screenshots; the mods are on my dead PC so can't retrieve these POS.
If ya want them so much I could start all over again tho. But it's huge - there's, like, a gazillion body variants.
Last edited:
- 256
- Germany
But the main differences in this pictures is NOT LCS. This has more to do with postprocessing and a different taste. If this is the same time/date, why should it be so bright in nighttimes.
Here is a current comparison between a MATCHED gamma and lcs integration:
With the next Pure version you can test this, but only for daytimes. There are thousands of little problems to be solved and as you see in the picture also in CSP the shaders will also need many work. But we should actually see it as a techdemo, BUT the differences are on shader level and NOT postprocessing. Gamms vs. LCS is not a brighter or more contrast picture or what so ever. The differences are a different math when calculating color / lights in the shader. So the overall picture should look the same in terms of brightness and contrast.
So here you can see a good example of how colors are differently calcualted:
And this results in a different presentation when you have many structures with different lights and shadows in the view. That is where LCS shines. Also the fog algorithm was changed with the LCS shaders:
- 24
- Cornwall
Hi Peter, i rarely post on here but soak up everything on this forum daily.But the main differences in this pictures is NOT LCS. This has more to do with postprocessing and a different taste. If this is the same time/date, why should it be so bright in nighttimes.
Here is a current comparison between a MATCHED gamma and lcs integration:
With the next Pure version you can test this, but only for daytimes. There are thousands of little problems to be solved and as you see in the picture also in CSP the shaders will also need many work. But we should actually see it as a techdemo, BUT the differences are on shader level and NOT postprocessing. Gamms vs. LCS is not a brighter or more contrast picture or what so ever. The differences are a different math when calculating color / lights in the shader. So the overall picture should look the same in terms of brightness and contrast.
So here you can see a good example of how colors are differently calcualted:
And this results in a different presentation when you have many structures with different lights and shadows in the view. That is where LCS shines. Also the fog algorithm was changed with the LCS shaders:
Personaly, i cannot see that much difference. To throw away years of Pure dev. and to start again rebuilding features as and when you can seems like a pain in the butt for you and everyone else for what appears small gain in quality if any.
Surely, with ACE around the next corner would it not be better to wait and see what it offers in terms of if or not everyone dumps on AC overnight (which i doubt).
If as i suspect, the new version does not replace AC then yeah, give it the future development.
Heck, i am looking forward to the mist option which may or maybe not be put on the shelf because of this LCS readjustment.
Anyway, i love what you have always done to raise the level of this sim.
- 376
- @home
It’s tricky to judge on a screen shot and I do not know if it’s at the cost of FPS nor it’s prone to decrease dynamic visual defects like shimmer, blurring or jaggies.
Could be I have to experience this in my own headset, only hope it’s not one of those “magnifier” improvements, prefer to have the real direct to notice improvements, like some of the aliasing techniques and Nvidia VRS in CM.
Could be I have to experience this in my own headset, only hope it’s not one of those “magnifier” improvements, prefer to have the real direct to notice improvements, like some of the aliasing techniques and Nvidia VRS in CM.
Last edited:
- 438
- Philippines
Hopefully, these 962s will be released in the future.
- 813
- Belgium
thanks Peter!
I'm not gonna go that radical for now, as apart from that 2nd GUI entry all works fine (afaik).
these 2 locations you gave did contain files called GUI_copy.ini , which I deleted and the problem is solved for me...
Bless you and thanks a million for your efforts on LCS and Pure! 👍
EDIT: in the blind poll I did last Tuesday (here ), it's now 20 to 1 in favor of pic B (which was with ... LCS)
Last edited:
- 577
- Germany
Masscot
(Banned)
- 6,566
- The Bunker
Thanks. There's also an issue with the wiper, part of it is not included in the group, so it gets left behind during the sweep animation.uncryptedf302_corvette_gtp
MediaFire is a simple to use free service that lets you put all your photos, documents, music, and video in a single place so you can access them anywhere and share them everywhere.www.mediafire.com
yep i change this
Can this be fixed too please?
Edit: Also, shifting is currently set up as h-pattern, but shouldn't this car be sequential?
Should perhaps be SUPPORTS_SHIFTER=0 in drivetrain.ini?
Last edited:
- 813
- Belgium
can you share your preview settings pls ? I tried w defaults from Opperslang, and it comes out with too little reflections:
compared to my go-to atm:
this level of reflection is much closer to the one in-game ...
also note that the reflectiveness slider doesn't seem to impact any of the previews when rendered with CSP:
can you pls share a link? ( can't find anything on racedepartment for "MCG" under Assetto Corsa ... )
- 143
- Italy
To you...this is what I notice above all from the internal view with which I am used to driving....thank you very much
Attachments
Similar threads
