Lets' face it, the Countach is as brash as the '70s decade in which it was born. Where its predecessor (the Miura) was as sexy as a Parisian
waitress (or waiter), the Countach is as sexy as Jason King. Yep, the '60s was a tough act to follow.
The first Countach appeared on Bertone's stand at the Geneva Show in 1971 - the same year that "Hot pants" were invented, yuk. All the exciting
bits were squeezed into the rear end and difficult to get at - just like the car. Gandini styled the Countach and it was called the LP500 (Longitudinale Posteriore 5-litre). Only one was built and it had a 5-litre 440bhp engine.
Production did not get underway until 1974. The production LP 400 Countach was now fitted with the smaller 4-cam, 4-litre, 375 bhp engine. Later Countach milestones were the 1978 LP 400S, the 1981 LP 500S and in the 1985 the 5.2-litre Quatrovalvole (455bhp). Here we test an early LP 400 Countach.
That very first Countach LP 500 had a semi-monocoque chassis but the production LP 400 cars had an intricate tubular steel spaceframe. This is an immensely strong structure with dozens of steel tubes welded together in such a way that they only have to deal with compression and tension loads; tricky bending moments are at a minimum. On this main chassis, a lightweight steel superstructure supports the handmade aluminium body panels.
The upward opening doors are hand-fitted to each car. I don't know how to describe the styling. The Miura was an impossible act to follow but whether the design anarchy of the Countach was the way to go, I know not.
From any angle it looks mad, only to look madder as the later cars evolved big arches and spoilers.
Ideally the Countach should be radio-controlled. It is when you install a human being that the problems arise. With the door open and looking into the car you notice that the two seats are very narrow and low between the immense door sills and broadbeamed transmission tunnel. Compared with today's curvy, roundy, friendly designs, the Countach - inside or out - assaults
the eye with coarse angles and poor ergonomics. From the driver's seat you can see forward with the usual limitations of a 3ft 6in high car. Rear
vision is by interior mirror only. Originally this gave a narrow field of vision through a recess in the roof. On this car it has been replaced by a mirror glued on to the screen which obscures some of the driver's forward field of vision. Anything not directly behind the car is unseen.
Rear three-quarter view? Forget it. Even side view is awkward, the door glass horizontal mid-frame coincides nicely with your eye level. Unless you have a head the size of a tennis ball, you can't lean out of the window. Exterior mirrors? Not on this car.
Exactly!