- 10,620
- gtp_jimprower
Willys "MB" Jeep
Willys Jeepster
AMC "CJ" Jeep
Chrysler "TJ" Wrangler
Ford Bronco '70
Land Rover Defender 90
Toyota FJ40
Willys Jeepster
AMC "CJ" Jeep
Chrysler "TJ" Wrangler
Ford Bronco '70
Land Rover Defender 90
Toyota FJ40
Oh deary me...
Is that the replacement for the Aviator? Because I really liked that.
The G-wagen was an Army transport car as well. So was the VW Kübelsitzwagen and Beetle; not to mention the Willy's Jeep.The US Armys workhorses do not make good civilian transport.
The G-wagen was an Army transport car as well. So was the VW Kübelsitzwagen and Beetle; not to mention the Willy's Jeep.
Thank you for that. Now why don't you take a cruise in your Lincoln Navigator and get stuck in a puddle, whilst I take any one of the cars I posted (except the Saturn) and proceed to kick the ass off-road of almost every other "SUV" posted in this thread (which means evey other car that isn't the Defender 90, G-Wagen, Range Rover and (in most cases) the Cayenne).Why would you like the VehiCross, what are you smoking and where can I get some?
I don't like you, you like ALL of the ugly, no FUGLY SUVs
Thank you for that. Now why don't you take a cruise in your Lincoln Navigator and get stuck in a puddle, whilst I take any one of the cars I posted (except the Saturn) and proceed to kick the ass off-road of almost every other "SUV" posted in this thread (which means evey other car that isn't the Defender 90, G-Wagen, Range Rover and (in most cases) the Cayenne).
BTW, If i wanted to go offroad I would get a wrangler Rubicon, despite how primitive they are.
Well, technically I'm sure the VehiCROSS, G-wagen, K-wagen and FJ40 could also go just as far....The only 4X4 that I can see matching the Wrangler these days is the Defender, and even then, that must be "primitive" by your definition, correct?
while it would seem the Defender would do best in the mud and other "British" off-road situations... I think of the Top Gear test of the LR3/Disco in that situation, and I'm not sure why.
If the Forester STi had 150hp and still looked like that you guys wouldn't like it. The only reason you guys think it's attractive is because you know its power rating. Sorry - put that aside, and it's a soccer mom's car. And a poor soccer mom at that.
Note that I think it's better looking because of the unique alloys, intake and bodykit, not the horsepower.
Do you really think those things change it enough to make it that good-looking?! I'm on the fence. For the record I actually like how the Forester looks - facelifted more than non - but I'm not sure if the bodykit is enough to push the STi into "best-looking" category.