- 29,909
- Glasgow
- GTP_Mars
Your version is a cover version...
Anybody know why they always play "America" whenever a British driver wins an F1 race? Uggghhhhhhhh.
The coverage of the parliamentary vote and some of the notes has been incredibly frustrating when the question has been raised as to why the vote doesn't include action in Syria.
It's incredibly simple. Iraq has asked us to intervene. And so we are legally allowed to act.
We have not been asked to fight in Syria. Therefore we would be attacking a sovereign nation. And after all the criticisms of previous legality of war, why is it even a discussion! ?
Since I mostly follow a realist line I have to ask. Who cares about legality of conflict? All states are selfish.legally
If I felt it was a conflict that threatened the UK then the legal system can wait. But it doesn't. This is a conflict for the region that can only be settled by the region. If we are participating then we should do so in a way that is welcomed by the international community and not justified after the fact.Since I mostly follow a realist line I have to ask. Who cares about legality of conflict? All states are selfish.
Who cares about legality of conflict?
I hate war, it's nothing more than a contest to see who has the biggest d**k or whose god has the biggest d**k. Which gives me problems because we live in a world where there already are wars and already is violence. Pacifism alone cannot solve it. It makes me very uncomfortable.
The Hague?The Hague.
The illegality of conflict has resulted in pretty much any war before 1945. Think of any British war, conflict and battle in earlier periods of history and you'll find something which did not have the consent of the people. There might also be a correlation between British engagements and levels of aristocracy power.
I hate war, it's nothing more than a contest to see who has the biggest d**k or whose god has the biggest d**k. Which gives me problems because we live in a world where there already are wars and already is violence. Pacifism alone cannot solve it. It makes me very uncomfortable.
That is all UN based. Following a strict realist principle the UN is useless.
Well he does have a track record of making stuff up so on the face of it they should make a good fit.
Buffoon.
Yet the dangerous thing is that he is shrewder than his genial, P G Wodehouse public persona lets on.
"You have permission to purr, Dave..."![]()
Yet the dangerous thing is that he is shrewder than his genial, P G Wodehouse public persona lets on.
I'll see your Boris Johnson, and raise you a Clive Palmer. He's Boris without brains.London would have fallen apart by now if he truly was the man he appears to be
BNP leader turns out to be an arse. I bet nobody saw that coming.
Does appear to have Zachary Disease though.Depends which side it approached him from, of course...