Car Reviewing on GT5

  • Thread starter counter345
  • 95 comments
  • 11,446 views

What would you like me to review next?

  • Nissan Fairlady Z32 v Nissan Fairlady Z33 v Nissan Fairlady Z34

    Votes: 9 17.0%
  • Old V new- R34 Skyline vs Skyline Coupe

    Votes: 6 11.3%
  • Supercar battle- Ferrari 458 Italia v Mercedes SLS AMG

    Votes: 7 13.2%
  • Raving Rivals- 2010 Subaru Impreza Sedan v Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X

    Votes: 13 24.5%
  • Single Review- Audi R8 4.2 FSI

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • Spicy Hot Hatch Review- RenaultSport Clio V6

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • Volkswagen Sambabus Review

    Votes: 5 9.4%
  • Volkswagen Golf GTI battle- old V new

    Votes: 6 11.3%
  • Other (please post comment!)

    Votes: 3 5.7%

  • Total voters
    53
664
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
counter345
Hi guys, I'm going to start reviewing some ROAD cars, relevant to GT5.

What I mean by relevant to GT5, is that I will focus more on drive control, interior visibility etc. rather than things like tax cost and fuel costs (both which aren't included in the game). I will review them on their first impressions, their cost, their cornering skills, their looks (exterior and interior as well as visibility), function (e.g if wipers and headlamps work, etc.), it's usefulness (what events it can be used in, how good it is in these events) and the power and other specs, and finally I will give it an overall rating, lap times (planning to do on Tsukuba and Le Sarthe for cornering and acceleration, respectively), and what it's opponents would be and how they compare to them.

So, what car would you like me to review? Remember, ROAD cars only. 👍

Suzuki Cervo SR '07

Ford GT '06 VS Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (C6) '06

HONDA NSX TYPE R '02 VS MAZDA RX-7 SPIRIT R TYPE A (FD)'02

Ferrari 458 Italia '09 VS Mercedes AMG SLS '10

Ferrari Enzo '02
 
Last edited:
No offence dude, but most of the active members on here pretty much have all the cars in their GT5 garage, and have therefore driven them all too, so you wouldn't be telling us anything we haven't known for months.

Just saving you time and effort 👍
 
Suzuki CERVO SR '07

TsukubaCircuit.jpg


COST AND FIRST IMPRESSIONS

This is the Suzuki Cervo SR. On your first glance, it isn't very exciting to look at. It's very simple and quite dull, and even in lively colours it's still not a looker. It's not ugly, but it's very discreet, with no flares or dents or scoops on the front, with that small and simple mid-placed grill, with that simple silver 'S' badge. It's slightly sleek, but it still isn't a looker.

It's the same inside. Everything's black, the speedos are normal (but very visible) and it's rather dull. It's got all the functions of a premium car (headlights- low/main beam, foglights, horn, wipers, cockpit), but the GT Auto Aero Modifications are really cheesy and make it very ugly. Not only this, but you've only got two front choices and two wing choices.

However, this machine is cheap, in fact THE cheapest premium car in the New Dealership, costing just 14,180 credits. So, is this bargain bang for your buck, or a slow hauler?

PERFORMANCE

Good news. This little bug is a blast to drive, take it to the Nurburg and be prepared to fall in deep love. Despite being a front-wheeled drive mini-car, it has very little bodyroll and very little understeer, despite being stock on Comfort Mediums. This is partly because of the very low weight of 820 kilos, which makes it very light. I was surprised to see that I was only braking for the really tight corners, and simply just gliding around the others.

MAIN SPECS

This is a K-car, with 63 horsepower (max) and 9kg/fm of Torque, coming from a turbocharged 658CC, 3 cylinder engine. Despite the low power, with a bit of a struggle it can reach 100mph on a long straight, in a slipstream it can reach over 120. Not bad for a car which only has the worst part of 60 horsepower. Though it is quite sluggish in the straights.

GEARING

This thing shifts. Literally. It has a 7-speed CVT transmission, and there is NO power loss when you change gear. It's almost as if it changes gear at the speed of light. However, I do not see the point of a 7 speed gearbox. On a 700hp group C LM car, yes, but on a 60hp k-car? I just don't see the point, and I think it would have been more beneficial with 6 gears.

MISCELLANEOUS

This thing has bright headlights and fast windscreen wipers, so it is cockpit-user-friendly. It also has a huge window, which means visibility is high, and you can actually see what's behind you thanks to no massive rear wing getting in the way.

SUITABLE OPPONENTS AND COMPARISONS

The Fiat 500 is a suitable contender for an 'opponent'. It has a tad bit more torque and 5 more horsepower but also weights a great deal more as well. There's also more good news for the Cervo. The Fiat 500 costs 23,300 credits- a whopping 9,120 credits more than the Cervo. Although it has a more interesting cockpit and looks cooler- the Cervo is more nimble and has snappier gear changes, and wins in a drag race.

The lap times speak for themselves. They both have the same tyres, and both were best, clean laps with only ABS on.

Cervo at Tsukuba- 1.20.626
Fiat at Tsukuba- 1.22.772

That's over 2 seconds difference.

Cervo at Sarthe- 6.34.242
Fiat at Sarthe- 6.46.731

That's over 12 seconds faster.

the Daihatsu Copen is also a good contender, with VERY similar specs and a good price match, too.

The Cervo can enter the Sunday Cup and the K-car cup, which it is quite good at, and also the FF challenge, but you will need something more powerful for the FF challenge.

Overall, the Cervo is a brilliant nippy car, though has a few niggles, like the annoying engine whine and it's strange body shape, though don't let these tiny oddities stop you from buying a great car for the money.
 
Last edited:
No offence dude, but most of the active members on here pretty much have all the cars in their GT5 garage, and have therefore driven them all too, so you wouldn't be telling us anything we haven't known for months.

Just saving you time and effort 👍

👍 I'll just do it for fun then :D But thanks for the heads up anyway!
 
No offence dude, but most of the active members on here pretty much have all the cars in their GT5 garage, and have therefore driven them all too, so you wouldn't be telling us anything we haven't known for months.

Just saving you time and effort 👍

On the other hand, little Johnny has bought the game yet, so when he picks it up tomorrow he might want a review for some cars.

OP, review away.
 
On the other hand, little Johnny has bought the game yet, so when he picks it up tomorrow he might want a review for some cars.

OP, review away.

Can't deny that mate. I was just remarking about the majority of his audience. If he'd had this idea on launch day however.... a sure-fire winner!
 
No offence dude, but most of the active members on here pretty much have all the cars in their GT5 garage, and have therefore driven them all too, so you wouldn't be telling us anything we haven't known for months.

Just saving you time and effort 👍

I wouldn't say it matters and it's cool other people are doing the idea I started whether knowing or not. Besides, those people are collectors with no care to drive what they have.

As a writer myself of comparison tests, you have a good first crack at this counter345, tips I'd prefer to give is keep the audience entertained. What I noticed is, is that you should go for the funny. And it has to be a subject you can stick with. Case in point is the late 80's comparo I did about a week ago, I continued blathering about raves and cocaine and stuff. Harmless, but it's funny.

Also, be descriptive. More words that provide more reading, the better. Full-length paragraphs take time, but the readers like 'em. And I don't want to be a whiner or stuck-up, but I need more about the way it feels. How's the steering, or the brake feel. Is the power delivery good or not? And just how fun is the drive, which to me is factor #1, and just how does it create fun? And how's it fun for you? Remember, you're the driver- tell them how you like to have fun with it.

Just throwing in my insight here. Cool work, hope I have a competitor here. :D
 
1st review was very good to be honest, cant wait for the next one! :) I didnt even know this car "Suzuki Cervo SR" existed in GT5 :D
I did like how you pointed out alot of great stuff, new to me, and that you used Standart tyres (original stock) and no tuning, very good job!

How about review this:

Mazda RX-7 GT-X (FC) &#8216;90, (premium) << this is very good car, I use it for dual drifts with friends, never had it for racing, will be interesting read.
Jaguar E-TYPE Coupe &#8216;61, (standart) << Im sure this will be best review, and you will have alot of fun!
Ford GT &#8216;06, (premium) << I have one, never drove it, Im afraid of it to be honest (I remember it from GT4, and now I have a wheel, so its even more challange for me) :)

PS. I do collect cars and I do drive them all (at least try), but still this review was very interesting to read.
 
Last edited:
Why do people like these crap econo boxes so much? maybe if GT fans stopped liking them so much PD wouldn't load the game with all those garbage Honda Beat type cars.
 
1st review was very good to be honest, cant wait for the next one! :) I didnt even know this car "Suzuki Cervo SR" existed in GT5 :D
I did like how you pointed out alot of great stuff, new to me, and that you used Standart tyres (original stock) and no tuning, very good job!

How about review this:

Mazda RX-7 GT-X (FC) ‘90, (premium) << this is very good car, I use it for dual drifts with friends, never had it for racing, will be interesting read.
Jaguar E-TYPE Coupe ‘61, (standart) << Im sure this will be best review, and you will have alot of fun!
Ford GT ‘06, (premium) << I have one, never drove it, Im afraid of it to be honest (I remember it from GT4, and now I have a wheel, so its even more challange for me) :)

PS. I do collect cars and I do drive them all (at least try), but still this review was very interesting to read.

Thanks for the ideas!
 
Why do people like these crap econo boxes so much? maybe if GT fans stopped liking them so much PD wouldn't load the game with all those garbage Honda Beat type cars.

They're fun to drive and a blast through the corners. Or at least, this one is. GT5 is about variety. You don't want to get rid of variety.
 
They're fun to drive and a blast through the corners. Or at least, this one is. GT5 is about variety. You don't want to get rid of variety.

My advice to you would be to review the more expensive cars. Reason? Anybody can afford to buy one of these cheapies, so it won't really matter if it's crap or not. But you'd be doing a handy service by telling people whether the more expensive cars are worth it.
 
The premium Civic Type R (EK) '97, Corvette ZR1 (C6) '09, 458 Italia and Gallardo are very popular purchases that can take players a long way through the game.

It would be interesting to see reviews (and comparisons) of alternatives with similar potential and could be useful to people just starting out or considering starting over.
 
Can't deny that mate. I was just remarking about the majority of his audience. If he'd had this idea on launch day however.... a sure-fire winner!

Which changes everyday on here. Have you been following the "counter" on how many registered users sign up everyday?
 
Hi guys, I'm going to start reviewing some ROAD cars, relevant to GT5.

What I mean by relevant to GT5, is that I will focus more on drive control, interior visibility etc. rather than things like tax cost and fuel costs (both which aren't included in the game). I will review them on their first impressions, their cost, their cornering skills, their looks (exterior and interior as well as visibility), function (e.g if wipers and headlamps work, etc.), it's usefulness (what events it can be used in, how good it is in these events) and the power and other specs, and finally I will give it an overall rating, lap times (planning to do on Tsukuba and Le Sarthe for cornering and acceleration, respectively), and what it's opponents would be and how they compare to them.

So, what car would you like me to review? Remember, ROAD cars only. 👍

Do what you want to do mate! Someone will be reading it! (ME)!
 
The premium Civic Type R (EK) '97, Corvette ZR1 (C6) '09, 458 Italia and Gallardo are very popular purchases that can take players a long way through the game.

It would be interesting to see reviews (and comparisons) of alternatives with similar potential and could be useful to people just starting out or considering starting over.

What I will do, is start off with the little cars, then the sort of japanese mid-sized speeders, and then the supercars. 👍
 
Ford GT '06 VS Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (C6) '06

Ford GT '06

CircuitdelaSarthe2009.jpg


COST AND FIRST IMPRESSIONS

Hmm. A midship, american supercar with a muscle car engine. Interesting. ON your first glance in the Ford dealership, you will be 'ood' and 'aahd' by the many potholes punched in the bonnet, and the side skirts, as well as that swooping rear with a slightly lifted spoiler-type thing, as well as those circular rear lights and those sticky-outty exhausts slap bang in the middle. Definitely looks tasty.

On the other hand, 149,880 credits is a LOT for an american horse. So, will it be worth your precious credits?

PERFORMANCE

This american abomination has a SUPERCHARGED v8 engine mounted mid-ship, spitting out 550 horsepower and having almost 70kg/fm of torque at maximum. Of course, it's easy to get carried away with the numbers, but those are pretty big, even for the hefty price. But numbers only tell half the story, so I took it to Nurburg, to see what's what.

When you start driving, you will be hypnotized by that familiar V8 growl at 5,000 RPM, and you can feel that massive power hammering the car forward. But that's where the good news ends.

The Ford GT weighs in at about 1 and a half tonnes, which makes it quite a heavy hauler for a mid-ship supercar, which means it has a tendency to oversteer and understeer. With this car, it doesn't seem to go where you want it to go- its soft suspension, and high weight means that it's not that snappy or sharp and you don't quite feel connected with it, like it's floating on invisible ice. On the Special Stage Route 7, I managed to top 210 mph, which is very good for a stock supercar.

But it has the X factor I look for in a high-performance supercar, which is it's fun to drive and master, because of it's uncertainty, and it will keep you entertained.

GEARING

Stock, the Ford GT has 6 gears, set to about 250 MPH- but it simply does not have enough oomph to get there on its own. It will need tuning and/or slipstreaming to reach that speed. The 6 gears is good, but the 6th gear is useless because it's got no power, aka it's like a 'cruising gear'. Basically, for top speed, keep it in fifth. It's also got a very high 60 mph 1st gear, which is useful for drag racing and makes the most out of early power.

BRAKING

Braking is easily one of the worst parts of the Ford GT. The brakes are rather slow and are similar to the Suzuki CERVO I reviewed earlier- good for a small car, bad for a supercar.

MISCELLANEOUS

The Ford GT has sidelights, low beam, high beam, and fog lights. It's lights are average (sidelights are a cool, orange glow though) and the cockpit isn't optimistic because it hasn't got very high visibility, front or back. The cockpit itself is cool though, you have a simple tachometer right in front of you and a speedometer to your right. The oil pressure also works (small dial to the right of the tacho) which is a nifty little feature.

SUITABLE OPPONENTS

The Corvette is a pretty close opponent. It has similar specs and also has a supercharged V8 as the main oomph. However, the SLS AMG is also fairly close, but weighs 150KG more. Ironically, both were made in 2006, which also the song "Speed of Sound" was placed on iTunes. Just goes to show how much power these things really have!

Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (C6) '06

Corvette.jpg


COST AND FIRST IMPRESSIONS

Like the Ford GT, the Vette has special shapes in its bonnet and scoops on the side. The corvette also has four exhaust pipes, slap-bang in the middle, but unlike the Ford, it costs an amazing over 50,000 cheaper, at just under 100 grand. So, what is the Corvette like as a cheap alternative?

PERFORMANCE

The Corvette is slightly under-performing in terms of power, compared to the mighty Ford GT. It's 7 litre V8 engine is mounted in the front, and creates 503 horse power and 64.90 kg/fm of torque at best, so it isn't as fast as the Ford GT when we look at the specification. It is slightly lighter though, as 30 kilos less. It isn't just the maximum power though- it's how the Corvette utilises these horsies on the track. I took it to the Nurburgring like the Ford GT to see how it handled with less power.

As soon as I started driving, I had the same bass from that V8 under the bonnet, and the subtle whine treble of that supercharger. You can feel all of those torques lunging the car forward, like the Ford GT, but there was a huge difference. In the corners, it behaved like a different animal. It had more oversteer, and controllable oversteer, and very little understeer, which meant I could pull off a drift. It felt much more responsive, much more connected to the road. The back end was lunging out of place telling me "You're pushing me too hard!" and it was a brilliant feeling. You just seem to have more grip and you get a sense of achievement and relief when you drift around a corner successfully. The body was beautifully composed, sliding round each corner, making mincemeat of the apex. It was an agile little mouse, whipping through each corner. More importantly though, it was even more fun to drive and master than the Ford GT. In pursuit for a top speed, I managed 203 mph- not bad, but was outdone by the more powerful Ford GT.

GEARING

The Vette gears reasonably, and, like the Ford GT, has 6 gears. And also like the Ford GT, has a useless, really tall 6th gear for cruising. With the gearing, it could reach 260+ MPH... but without enough power, it won't reach that stock. It also has a high 1st gear at about 56 MPH like the Ford GT.

BRAKING

Unfortunately, it's the same story with the Ford GT and Corvette; braking is still very poor and takes a long time to slow down.

MISCELLANEOUS

Like the Ford GT, sidelights, low beam, high beam and fog lights are present and functional, horn is included, and a cockpit view is included. Unlike the Ford GT, thanks to the engine being up in the front, visibility in the rear is better, as is the front view. You have a miles-per-hour head-up display so you know how fast you are going without having to squint at that hard-to-read speedometer. Overall though, the cockpit is uninteresting and nothing fascinating.

LAP TIMES

Here are the lap times for the Vette and the Ford GT on the Tsukuba Circuit and Curcuit de la Sarthe, resectively.

Corvette:
Tsukuba- 1.03.748
Sarthe- 4.30.051

Ford GT:
Tsukuba- 1.04.463
Sarthe- 4.30.579

CONCLUSION AND OTHER RIVALS

In conclusion, I think the Corvette is the one to go for because it feels so much more active to drive and much more frisky. And it's 50,000 credits cheaper.

Other rivals may include the Nissan GT-R '07, or the Mercedes SLS AMG '10, or the Ferrari 458 Italia '09.
 
I like that you're grading the cars' braking when they all have the same brakes. :lol:
 
Great stuff there. Read through all of it. I like how it's not all numbers or a very long essay. Short and snappy which gets the reader involved. Good work, keep it up.
 
I like that you're grading the cars' braking when they all have the same brakes. :lol:

Actually, to me different cars seem to have different brakes. I don't know if it's just me.

E: It would be great if you could review the Honda NSX-R.
 
Nice reviews couter345, keep 'em coming :) Just a small note: The Corvette Z06 is Naturally aspirated, not supercharged. The ZR1 is the supercharged model!
 

Latest Posts

Back