http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2005/10/07/145041.htmlsome articleBesting a 600 HP Nissan Skyline and nitrous-charged Volkswagen Jetta
BUTTONWILLOW, California - Timing is everything, and the timing of the new Cobalt SS Supercharged's introduction couldn't be better. As Chevy's new sport compact performance car debuts in dealer showrooms, it already has a record-setting pedigree. Driver John Heinricy piloted a race-prepared Cobalt SS Supercharged on a challenging road course at the Buttonwillow Raceway Park, besting both the legendary Nissan Skyline and the new Volkswagen Jetta by more than seven seconds. The Cobalt SS, which is based on Chevy's new factory-built front-wheel-drive Super Sport, posted a time of 1:58 around Buttonwillow's #13 track configuration, which was fast enough to eclipse the marks set by the All-Wheel-Drive, twin-turbo Skyline (2:05) and the nitrous-charged Jetta (2:07).
"It was an absolute blast to run the Cobalt SS flat-out on the Buttonwillow track," said Heinricy, current SCCA driving champion and GM Performance Division's Director of High Performance Vehicle Operations. "GM Performance Division and the Powell Motorsports crew gave me a perfectly prepared car, and the Ecotec engine ran flawlessly."
A television crew from Speed Channel's Street Tuner Challenge was on hand to direct the day's competition at the track. The Street Tuner Challenge chose three vehicle makes representing North America (Chevrolet Cobalt SS), Europe (Volkswagen Jetta) and Asia (Nissan Skyline) and followed each team throughout a 13 week build competition. The Cobalt build team was comprised of engineers and designers from the GM Performance Division and Powell Motorsports, while the Nissan Skyline was built by XS Engineering and the Jetta was assembled by Autobahn Designs. The final time attack race served as the build completion and the culmination of pee Channel's taping. .
The production Cobalt SS Supercharged has strong performance credentials in factory trim. Powered by a supercharged and intercooled 205-horsepower, 2.0-liter Ecotec DOHC four-cylinder engine and equipped with a tenacious suspension developed on Germany's famed Nurburgring race track, the production Cobalt SS Supercharged will bring more heat to the already red-hot sport compact segment.
GM Performance Division created the Cobalt SS for this time attack competition to demonstrate the ultimate capabilities of the four-cylinder, supercharged Ecotec engine and Chevy's new front-wheel-drive "tuner" car. The program was led by the GM Performance Division, in collaboration with Chevrolet, GM Powertrain, GM Performance Parts, and GM Design. Powell Motorsports, in Blackstock, Ontario, Canada provided vehicle preparation and logistical support for the successful assault on the time attack.
"The Cobalt SS surpassed every expectation we had going into this competition," said GM Performance Division Executive Director Mark Reuss. "We came to Buttonwillow to demonstrate the performance and reliability of the Ecotec engine on one of the most demanding tracks in the world. The Cobalt SS, driver John Heinricy, and the entire team performed to the highest standards. We're out here to be the best, and today we proved that Chevy and GM race to win."
Enthusiasts will be able to catch a live glimpse of the Time Attack Cobalt SS Supercharged this November at the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA) show in Las Vegas. It will also run on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 in Super Street magazine's Time Attack at Buttonwillow Raceway Park.
Time Attack Cobalt SS Supercharged Specifications
Body/chassis structure:
Uni-body
Body material:
Two sided galvanized steel, carbon fiber doors, hood, decklid, rear wing, front splitter, roof
Chassis material:
Two sided galvanized steel, carbon fiber roof
Suspension
Front:
Macpherson strut, no front bar, increased spring rates, Ohlins adjustable struts
Rear:
Twisting beam with adjustable sway bar, increased spring rate, Ohlins adjustable shocks
Wheels:
9.5 x 18, 9.5 x 17
Tire size
Front:
245 40 17
Rear:
Same as front
Tire brand:
Hoosier DOT
Brakes:
111.6 / 296 x 1.02 / 26; vented discs front 0.6 / 270 x .55 / 14; solid discs
Powertrain
Engine:
ECOTEC LSJ Supercharged
With Stage 2 Kit:
Larger injectors, 77.9 mm pulley
Engine displacement (cu. in / cc):
2000 cc
Horsepower maximum (hp / kw):
265 hp (SAE)
Torque maximum (lbs-ft / Nm)
270 lb-ft
Transmission:
F35 5 spd mt with 4.45 final drive
Dimensions
Height (in / mm):
55.7
Length (in / mm):
180.3
Width (in / mm):
67.9
Wheelbase (in / mm):
103.3
Track
Front/rear (in / mm):
57.1/58.1 nominal
Weight (lbs / kg):
2300 lbs
skip0110Driftster has the actual press release, sorry Blazin, but here it is from GM directly:
http://media.gm.com/servlet/Gateway...monthlyreleasedetail.do?domain=13&docid=19340
JNasty4G63Seems to me, with the season now over, the Mazda's did the hurtin. They won the ST manufacturers championship, with BMW coming in 2nd, and Chevy in 3rd. In fact, the Cobalts only won 3 times, with the Mazdas and BMWs winning the other 7. Aside from the events they won, they never really placed much higher than 4th or 5th in the races, getting beat by some RSX in the process as well. So, again, the Cobalt did well. But, didn't do much hurting.
Hilg
Are they thinking of rallying it or something? It's going to be hard to gain alleigance without some sort of racing history. (Even Ford Europe can justify the Focus RS with the older Cosworths...) Personally I'd like to see the supercharger on the AWD car (for the low-end torque).BlazinXtremeYa and there is supposed to be AWD added to the SS in 2008 which is going to be sweet I must say. And possibly a turboed 2.2L puting out 265ish horsepower.
Again, I'm not knocking the Cobalt, or its racing prowess. But, I really don't see what it did in this series a "hurtin" so to speak. Aside from the 3 races it won, and the one 2nd it got, the other races were a few 5ths, a 6th, a 7th, and a 9th. Yes, as you said, for a maiden year program, that is a decent first step. But, not what I personally would call dominant or worthy of any "hurtin" comments.Layla's KeeperBut that the Cobalt SS's could come in out of left field in their first year and run to the front the way they have is putting a hurtin' on established teams.
skip0110Are they thinking of rallying it or something? It's going to be hard to gain alleigance without some sort of racing history. (Even Ford Europe can justify the Focus RS with the older Cosworths...) Personally I'd like to see the supercharger on the AWD car (for the low-end torque).
265 hp would slot it between the $25K 230 hp WRX and $33K 300 hp WRX STi, so can we expect a price of $29,000 or so?
Now that I wouldn't mind buying. AWD would be a very welcome improvement, and it would definitley be directly compared to the Subaru WRX; a car vitrually in a class of its own (small AWD sedan). It would definitley improve sales in Canada, where AWD is a very welcome feature during the winter months (For the record, I don't think I've seen a single Cobalt SS on the road yet).BlazinXtremeYa and there is supposed to be AWD added to the SS in 2008 which is going to be sweet I must say. And possibly a turboed 2.2L puting out 265ish horsepower.
Actually, aside from the 3 wins and the 2nd, the RSX beat the Cobalts everytime. So thats 6-4 on better finishes for the Acura. And, Acura only finished 3 points behind them in the final manufacturer's points. And, thats basically because they had less cars scoring points.LeadSlead#2....didnt they beat RSX's in this cup? i'd also say they beat all FF cars as well--yes they put a hurtin out there
Um, yea, I'd have to agree with Blazin on that one as well. The Daimler/Mercedes brand has been making and racing cars for as long as cars have been around. And, if not them, I still have to say Porsche is ahead of Chevy. Porsche races in so many series, and wins VERY often. Chevy does good here in the states with Cup. But, aside from that, they don't do much to speak of in any big numbers.LeadSlead#2.....but that's what GM does----need we remember that Chevy is the winningest nameplate in racing's history?
BlazinXtremeI doubt Chevy is the winningest name plate in racing history, I would think Mercedes Benz is.
Ev0Now that I wouldn't mind buying. AWD would be a very welcome improvement, and it would definitley be directly compared to the Subaru WRX; a car vitrually in a class of its own (small AWD sedan). It would definitley improve sales in Canada, where AWD is a very welcome feature during the winter months (For the record, I don't think I've seen a single Cobalt SS on the road yet).
Young_WarriorAudi aka Auto union pretty much won every competition they ever entered so their contenders aswell.
Wolfe2x7Looks to me like the time attack was just a poorly-done publicity stunt. A tricked out Skyline, a nitroused Jetta, and a race-ready Cobalt? WTF kinda competition is that?
Now, before someone leaps down my throat, I'm not calling the Cobalt a ****ty or slow car; I'm just not impressed by this time attack thing, and I don't think the Cobalt is a class-leader in any category.
I'd bet on Ferrari before I would Chevy, as well...
LeadSlead#2ok you guys need mental help. you suppose mercedes & auto union? holy crap guys, seriously, auto union hasnt even raced in what? 40-60 years? im sure they won more races than chevy---mercedes would have a chance---if they started racing in more forms of racing despite only turning left, NASCAR series Does count---you guys in these car forums really, really need to check your facts before you run off about these things-----fart
so you can keep betting on whoever & thinking maybe these guys, or, go get an actual solid fact-based opinion!
Then, oh master of all that is automotive, show us some real facts that back up your "Chevy is the winningest manufacturer ever" claim. You're just spouting crap so far. Show some real facts, otherwise your doing nothing more than anyone else.LeadSlead#2.....so you can keep betting on whoever & thinking maybe these guys, or, go get an actual solid fact-based opinion!