In terms of what? NFS is advertised to a much larger level than GT has ever been & has a gigantic market in the racing genre.
That's an opinion.
Put it this way, GT is only on game number 5. The first one on PS1 successfully buried
every racing game on any console at the time. Quality-wise, it outshines everything. Each one has been brilliant.
NFS games' quality has been very inconsistent. A brief word on each NFS game (my opinion):
NFS1: Good
NFS2: Poor
NFS Hot pursuit: Good. Best one on PS1.
NFS4: Average, should have been better.
NFS Porsche Challenge: Average at best. Poor developer (Eden Studios)
NFS Hot Pursuit 2: Not bad, but I expected more for the series first PS2 outing.
NFS Underground/Underground 2: Both very poor. A wrong direction for the franchise.
NFS Most wanted: Entertaining for a short while, but average game overall.
NFS Carbon: Like Underground. ie
terrible.
NFS Pro Street: Erm....the worst in the series. Again, a wrong direction.
NFS Undercover: Sequel to Most Wanted, so like that game it was fun for a while, then got boring. Only thing that held my attention was the fact that it had Maggie Cheung.....
NFS Shift: Had it's problems, but it was easily the best one on PS3, and the best NFS since Most Wanted.
So, 13 games, but only around 4 were any good. The biggest racing series? I don't think so. It may have bigger advertising etc, but that's driven by EA's money-men. Advertise a turkey properly and people will foolishly buy it. When
I'm talking about the biggest racing series, I'm talking solid quality. Something the NFS series certainly hasn't been consitent with.
I would hope in this day and age, people will be smarter and not be fooled by multi-million pound advertising.
Only an idiot would buy a game without first renting it, playing a demo, or reading multiple reviews. I certainly don't buy a game that gets less than 8/10 or an 85-95% score.