Did PD intentionally nerf the G27 to artificially favor the T500?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Devedander
  • 267 comments
  • 27,720 views
Messages
4,323
There were quite a few posts in the T500 thread involving the logitech wheels and since they were off topic, I figured I would bring it up here and see if interest in the subject continues.

A little basic info on the subject: the Logitech G27 is misssing some features in GT5 that appear conspicuously like an intentional nerf of the product.

The L3 and R3 (outside red buttons on the shifter) do not work at all but they did in GT5P. They simply don't respond in GT5. Button that USED to work have been effectively "turned off" leaving the G27 somewhaht tight on buttons.

The bottom 4 buttons oon the wheel don't work at all, they did in GT5P albeit they were repeates (ie all 6 buttons only counted as L2 or and R2 on respective sides of the wheel). This proves that the PS3 (and thus any games running on it) can detect those buttons.

You cannot access the RA menu from a G27 but you can from a G25. When assigned to any button, the RA Menu function does nothing.

So basically the G25 works as it should across the board, the G27 is crippled on a few fronts.

PD have said that isues with Logitech are due to firmware operations or otherwise pointed the fimger at Logitech for G25/G27 however none of that seems to hold up as the only specific issue ever brought up was shifting which ahs somehow been fixed despite Logitech not releasing any fimware to fix it. The rest of the issue is simply button functionality and the buttons on the G27 work in other games (including GT5P) so it isn't like the PS3 just can't see the buttons or anything.

With the upcoming Thrustmaster wheel it seems awfully coincidental that the G27 is missing some very strange functionality, but it seems very convenient that it nerfs arguably the T500's biggest competitor in a non critical but quite annoying way...

Add on top of this that the T500 H shifter won't be out for a few months after the wheel/pedals will and the wheel seems to be kind of shy on buttons by itself and it seems perhaps nerfing some buttons avoid the G27 from actually being better than the T500 right out of the box.

One might wonder why the G25 wouldn't get a nerf also but since it's not manufactured anymore, it's not really a marketplace competitor for the T500 and actually the fact that it works kind of strenghthens my belief that it's an intentional hit from PD on the G27 as it's obviously possible to get a wheel with less buttons and functions completely supported.

This is all considering that the wheel works fine in other games on the PS3 and on the PC (so it's again not just a case of the PS3 can't use certain buttons) and logitechs own staff have said that button mapping (and what's available) is up to the game devs:

http://forums.logitech.com/t5/PLAYSTATION-3-READ-ONLY-ARCHIVE/G27-Button-Map/td-p/404863

And it really seems like PD have played some dirty poker here with the G27...

There were some ideas thrown around but I think a lot of them were from people who don't really understand the sitaution or the technology. For instance:

How do you know it's not logitechs fault some buttons don't work?

Because these buttons work in other games. This proves the PS3 can read these buttons and they are then accessible to all games, if a certain game chooses to ignore a button, that means the game was programmed this way.

It's Logitechs fault for releasing a wheel that was not compatible with GT5P AFTER GT5P was released

This isn't really anybodies fault per se as much as it is the fact that a standard can't be accounted for before it's put into use. GT5P was designed to work with what was out there and didn't/couldn't know what was coming down the pipes in the future so was not coded to use some future peripherals. The G27 was released to a standard that GT5P was not programmed to and it was just a timing issue. Why GT5P was never patched to fully support G27 is another question entirely and this has nothing to do with why things don't work in GT5.

It's not on purpose, it's just how things worked out, PD made the game work with G25 logitech made the G27 a little different causing problems

This is a two fold issue, 1 it in no way explains what happened to the L3 and R3 buttons on the G27 between GT5P and GT5 - it's one thing to believe it just hasn't ever been fixed, but it DID work and now doesn't... that excludes the explanation it was just an oversite in the progression of hardware.

2 The way peripherals work is each button is assigned a name (Button1 Button2 Button3 for example) and each analogue is assigned an axis (Z axis, Y axis etc for example) it's possible button names were changed (maybe it's changed form Button5 to Hat1) between hardware but it's not at all a hard thing to simply include these changes in button names and start accepting them. This also goes against the fact that functionality was lost from GT5P to GT5 when nothing about the wheel (and thus nothing about the button names) changed. And again, we know the PS3 can "see" all the buttons and analogue inputs becuase they work in other games.

RA menu doesn't work because there is no dial on a G27

RA menu doens't need a dial and it works on the G25. Even when programmed to a button that work for other stuff on the G27 the RA menu doesn't work. This is proof that PD are EXCLUDING it from working on the G27... the button ID that works for "look back" does nothing for RA. This means the game has been intentionally prgorammed to recognize that it's a G27 and then ignore the RA menu command entirely and there isn't really any explanation that could be made as to how this isn't intentional.

Why wasn't the G25 nerfedf also then?

The G25 is no longer in production and the G27 is the closest mainstream competitor to the T500. Honestly when people look at a higher end wheel most will be considering the T500 or G27 a their options.

Why not nerf something big like the gas pedal then?

Totally breaking functionality would draw a lot of heat on PD and ruin their plausible deniability. They would not be able to point the finger so easily at logitech and get away with it and it would draw a lot of ire from G27 owners who were now entirely out in the cold. Nerfing non critical fucntions and leaving the wheel still technically working but a less desireable option is what PD would be shooting for... it gives the consumer a place to make a choice and the hope would be the choice is to pay more for the 100% one than risk that the 90% wheels missing functions would ultimately be regretted. Most people work that way and will pay extra to hedge their fears.

What about the Fanatec wheels?

The Fanatec wheel use a dongle which is customizeable and essentially emulates other controllers, it would be hard if not impossible to nerf the Fanatec wheels without nerfing the legit controllers as well as the Fanatec can simply be update to mimic any other controller type with it's inputs.

This is all opinion, there is no fact behind it.

I beg to differ.. there is a lot of fact. The facts of what worked in GT5P and GT5 respectively between the wheels is not arguable, it just is. And if you understand how peripherals work and interact with the OS as well as how a program access peripheral inputs via the OS you can see that there are no explanations for these issues other than that they were intentional.

Why don't you blame logitech for not releasing a firmware update to fix the issue?

Because Logitech shouldn't have to and I am not even sure the G27 is user FW upgradeable.

But more to the point, if PD has done something non standard that means a standard wheel won't work with GT5, then that means any changes to "fix" the wheel would render it non standard and likely break it for other games. Imagine if you bought a TV with a non standard plug and the company said "well just change the plugs in your house to fit our non standard plug" obviously not a desireable solution.

But these aren't official GT5 wheels, PD never promised anything.

True and it's pretty sad that it's come down to "but I didn't promise" as a legitimate reasoning tactic...

But the point isn't whether anything was promised, but rather if PD DID nerf the G27 on purpose, it's arguably a pretty dirty thing to do and I doubt many could honestly say they feel it's something a "good" company like PD is often protrayed to be would do.

You can assign RA to the controller and use it with the G27.

True, this is a workaround however it does not mean the wheel wasn't nerfed. It also stands to be a check mark favoring the T500 assuming it CAN access the RA menu. Also worth noting, setting up RA menu on your controller makes it difficult to swap using the controller to race instead of a wheel as your buttons are now probably messed up.

For those who find this interesting, here is an easy to read starter on perpheral connections
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_interface_device

And if you are a real masochist and want a HUGE WOT, here is a more detailed explanation of the generalities of mapping inputs.
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?p=4454089&posted=1#post4453402

So that's my long winded post and what I think... what do you all think?
 
Last edited:
I think it's pretty much a given there is an element of this being deliberate. Even if there are genuine issues, PD and Logitech could resolve them but they both have a head in the sand approach to the issue. I suspect Logitech are knarked they didn't get the official contract and PD are not making any efforts to improve support for a peripheral they are getting no licensing from.

But it's the paying customer who really loses.
 
I wasn't surprised about the lack of G27 support when the T500 was announced a few days afterwards. Of course they want their official wheel to be the best supported, which they could have done by adding extra features - not taking them away from competing wheels. I also think it was done on purpose.
 
I think it's pretty much a given there is an element of this being deliberate. Even if there are genuine issues, PD and Logitech could resolve them but they both have a head in the sand approach to the issue. I suspect Logitech are knarked they didn't get the official contract and PD are not making any efforts to improve support for a peripheral they are getting no licensing from.

But it's the paying customer who really loses.

I am not sure what (reasonable) action logitech could have taken though? I mean this wheel works in some of the most highly regarded sims just fine... if it was a hardware problem you would think the iRacing crowd would be all over it.

Also any changes to the G27 would need to be via firmware upgrade, which on something like the G27 I am not sure is even possible let alone a risk a company wants to take (and it requires user intervention to accomplish).

I have to say that honestly in this case, I don't see the ball being in Logitech corner at all... the hardware is functional and the PS3 can fully support all it's inputs. It seems any issues must be on PDs end.

I definitely agree though, the customer looses ultimately which is one of the reasons I hate the "they never promised" argument... it seems many consumers are not willing to stand up for themselves anymore and are more interested in finding a way the corporations have a technical way out.
 
Well done.

I think you should be a lawyer...

You bring up lots of interesting food for thought. I don't see anything to refute the claims either.
 
Well, see, the G25 and G27 are NOT official GT wheels, meaning they were not made for GT5, nor were they marketed with GT5. The Thrustmaster is, and so was the DFGT and DFP. That shouldn't stop them from making it fully compatible though.
 
Well, see, the G25 and G27 are NOT official GT wheels, meaning they were not made for GT5, nor were they marketed with GT5. The Thrustmaster is, and so was the DFGT and DFP. That shouldn't stop them from making it fully compatible though.

He addressed this in the post, but it is a very true reality. I guess it's time for me to either get a Fanatec GT2 or TM T500RS.
 
He addressed this in the post, but it is a very true reality. I guess it's time for me to either get a Fanatec GT2 or TM T500RS.

And THAT would be exactly the marketing edge PD would be looking for in doing something like nerfing the G27 :)

They essentially turned a 3 item choice into a 2 item choice (that's ignoring the limited availability of the Fanatec option in many cases) which doesn't take a math genious to figure out helps the bottom line even if it's at cost to consumer.

Competition is always best for the consumer, what PD looks to have done is to reduce the competition.

Use a controller when you need buttons and wheel to drive?

Yes this is an option, however it's a workaround and the fact remain that the functionality appears very much to have been removed from the wheel on purpose.

When comparing options, a benefit of the T500 would (now) be that you don't have to setup a controller to access RA functions.

BTW do note, I sometimes use my controller to race instead of a wheel, putting RA menu on the controller messes up button mapping for controller based racing.

This isn't really a counter to the argument that G27 is nerfed, but it's a good point anyway so I will add it to the OP.
 
Well, see, the G25 and G27 are NOT official GT wheels, meaning they were not made for GT5, nor were they marketed with GT5. The Thrustmaster is, and so was the DFGT and DFP. That shouldn't stop them from making it fully compatible though.

Exactly.
 
And THAT would be exactly the marketing edge PD would be looking for in doing something like nerfing the G27 :)

They essentially turned a 3 item choice into a 2 item choice (that's ignoring the limited availability of the Fanatec option in many cases) which doesn't take a math genious to figure out helps the bottom line even if it's at cost to consumer.

Competition is always best for the consumer, what PD looks to have done is to reduce the competition.

And since PD decided to resort to this marketing, I refuse to support them and will buy a Fanatec! :sly:
 
And since PD decided to resort to this marketing, I refuse to support them and will buy a Fanatec! :sly:

Ultimately I would like to see more consumers thinking this way and acting to stand up for themselves 👍... I think this dirty poker marketing style (that basically tries to abuse the customer as much as you can without driving them fully away) is something we shoudln't be happy about...
 
There is one official wheel for GT5, branded and all. And I highly doubt the same people doing the (PR) deal are the ones actually programming the game.

I assume putting the official GT tag on said wheel came with a hefty price tag, so it is common business sense wanting to have something exclusive.

As with Fanatec, on the other hand, they seem to "borrow" some USB vendor ID or other to make their wheels compatible. This has been frowned upon and could lead to revoking any official USB vendor IDs.

Now Logitech couldn't afford to lose its IDs because of violation of the usage terms. I don't assume Fanatec would care that much.

The G27 works for the most part, shame and all it doesn't a 100 %. But that's the way it is.
 
There is one official wheel for GT5, branded and all. And I highly doubt the same people doing the (PR) deal are the ones actually programming the game.

I assume putting the official GT tag on said wheel came with a hefty price tag, so it is common business sense wanting to have something exclusive.

As with Fanatec, on the other hand, they seem to "borrow" some USB vendor ID or other to make their wheels compatible. This has been frowned upon and could lead to revoking any official USB vendor IDs.

Now Logitech couldn't afford to lose its IDs because of violation of the usage terms. I don't assume Fanatec would care that much.

The G27 works for the most part, shame and all it doesn't a 100 %. But that's the way it is.

While it's true that "That's the way it is" the question is, WHY is it that way?

If it's just unfortunately happenstance, then that's just the way it is... but if it's an intentional nerfing of the product by PD, it's a money grab move and it's dirty poker in my book.
 
And since PD decided to resort to this marketing, I refuse to support them and will buy a Fanatec! :sly:

And possibly by doing so the the crap doesn't go to the right direction. It's not thrustmaster here playing dirty games (if someone is) but pd. The "right way" is to buy forza3 or 4 instead of gt5.
 
And possibly by doing so the the crap doesn't go to the right direction. It's not thrustmaster here playing dirty games (if someone is) but pd. The "right way" is to buy forza3 or 4 instead of gt5.

I should reword that:

I refuse to support the partnership between PD and TM so i will not buy the TM wheel. Since i already bought GT5, i might as well not sell it but I might delay buying any purchasable DLC for a while (when that stuff comes).

That way TM doesn't get my money and PD gets much less of it. Win-Lose situation :). I win. PD and Thrustmaster lose :).
 
WHY is it that way?

Because the development of GT5 has cost Sony a great deal of money, 50 million USD is a conservative bet, they own the trademark on the GT brand and it is their good right to do any deal they want with 3rd parties selling branded products.

As far as I can tell no G27 owner is worse off than a G25 owner, and it really isn't a great deal mapping some buttons on a DS controller.

There's a lot of drama for little reason. And everyone can fix this "problem" easily and with minimum fuzz.
 
This whole situation is really unfortunate. The T500 looks like a solid wheel, no doubt. But, $600? The Logitech G27 is by far the wheel I'd most like to have. PD really gave us a low blow, nerfing it like they have. I refuse to buy something I can't use to it's full potential. In this case, the G27. If PD updated it with full support, I'd get it without hesitation. But, what good would that do them?

Look at it from a business standpoint:
Smart? Yes
Dirty? Did someone say money?
 
Last edited:
Than you OP. This is an issue worth knowing about to anybody thinking of buying the G27 like myself.
The TM wheel is so costly and the DFGT is without a H-patten box. What to do!
This is a kick in the nuts from PD and/or TM. It has destroyed a lot of my respect for them.
 
But T500 isn't G27 competitor neither DF GT is. Looking at price tag, T500 is twice the prize of G27. When asked Kaz said on twitter the support for G27 is coming.
 
im just glad i have a G25, if i had got a G27 instead i would have binned my GT5 game because it was so obvious the tactics they were using were dodgy.

anyone with half a brain can see they did it on purpose.
 
Shouldn't Polyphony/ Thrustmaster rely on superior quality to make sales rather than cheap, school yard tactics? If the T500 is the be all and end all of sim wheels, it will sell. Ofcourse, limiting other wheels would also increase T500 sales.But it begs the questions - if a quality wheel will sell, why resort to limiting the genres current top wheels?

Should we assume the T500 is not quality?
 
I've been kicking this idea around in my head ever since the Thrustbuster was anounced. Thanks for articulating it so nicely.
 
In a way the pd/tm scam is perfectly planned. Provide some support for g27 which is quite popular wheel so pd doesn't lose gt5 sales. But make it still crippled enough so people would consider getting the tm wheel. The only loser being logitech who has difficulties to sell g27s to gt5 players.

Although if the tm wheel is crap fanatec will probably sell few wheels ;)

:tinfoilhat:

(the only problem with this theory is that fanatec wheels still function 100%... Why not eliminate all opposition if you are going that way?)
 
I think the whole official wheels thing is a symptom of what is beginning to become the norm. Codemaster also had quite a few threads when F1 came out about wheel support, although obviously the G27 was supported by that game.

The problem is a large number of wheel owning players play many different sim racing games, I-Racing, Sim Bin titles, R-Factor and other console racing games. These wheels are expensive and the owners look at purchasing something that will cover as many titles as possible (a G27 in Aust is currently between $400 and $600AU, luckily I purchased mine a bit cheaper prior to GT coming out but did so based on what a popular wheel it is and supported by every game and new game out there). I believe the very popular, proven products should be supported by default, by production studios.

There is no way I would buy the T500, as for the high price I have no idea what future racing games it may support, and that is a huge $ outlay for possibly one game.

I think it is a shame that whoever is responsible, could not have some kind of anti competitive action taken up against them.
 
I think it is a shame that whoever is responsible, could not have some kind of anti competitive action taken up against them.

You mean the way they sued Microsoft for not supporting any wheel on the 360 other than their own? (<- this did not happen)

PD never supported officially any 3rd party wheels.

Don't blame economic reason for making a too hasty buying decission.

Gosh folks, really, it seems it's never asking nor wishing for a feature but always demanding. Like spending money gives anyone the right to force others into doing something.
 

Latest Posts

Back