Direction of the Shadow at Suzuka - Does GT get it right?

  • Thread starter Earth
  • 62 comments
  • 6,036 views
I think you all might be over complicating the shadow/time of day. If the map compass is correct, on the Forza shot at the end of the straight, the Sun appears to be in the north, so no matter what the time of day, it's wrong.
 
Peeps who think this is no big deal think like Forza devs, and that's why they will always be two steps behind PD
 
Can't they divide this forum into categories?

Category 1: sensible, usefull topics
Category 2: the biggest load of ... you've ever heard


Honestly, do you have nothing else to do until TGS or GT5 release date?

And where are the mods?

The frontpage of the GT5 forum has 35 post (without stickies) and 7 of them are usefull to me. 7.
Lock this please. And delete my comment, whatever you want.
 
By the way, I don't think any game is as slow as any of the Forzas. Load a track, start a race, restart a race, change the freaking car in a replay! Everything is more of a hassle in Forza.

What you are basically saying is that, if Forza took two hours to load a menu, and GT only one hour and a half, then everything would be okay?

Because that's what it sounds like for what you are saying. Forza is such a piece of 🤬 judging for what you are saying, that GT isn't so different to it in my eyes, if you keep comparing it to Forza. 👎

"We are better than that piece of 🤬, HURRAY! :cheers:"


EDIT: damez, I love your signature. 👍 :lol:
 
Opened a can of worms, Dancardesigner,Deve and a few others won't like that :nervous:
It won't take long... oh look!

What you are basically saying is that, if Forza took two hours to load a menu, and GT only one hour and a half, then everything would be okay?
What I'm saying is it's funny that only one game can receive criticism here, when supporters of the other game don't say much of anything about that other game's faults, especially when they're sometimes much worse. And then some of them use words like "hypocrit" and "fanboy" rather liberally. True? ;)
 
What I'm saying is it's funny that only one game can receive criticism here, when supporters of the other game don't say much of anything about that other game's faults, especially when they're sometimes much worse. And then some of them use words like "hypocrit" and "fanboy" rather liberally. True? ;)

See and THIS is where I think the fact that this is a GT forum should come into play...

It makes sense to say positive things about GT here (it's a GT forum) and if referencing comparisons from other games... well that can be solid backup for an argument.

It makes sense to say negative thigns about GT here (it's a GT forum) and if referencing comparisons from other games... well that can be solid backup for an argument.

It DOESN'T make sense to go dissing other games here... then you are talking about other games, you aren't using them for reference anymroe, you are judging them and discussing them... positive or negative that should be saved for whatever forum bears the name of that game.

So bearing that in mind, the fact only one game can recieve criticism makes sense as long as that game is GT as that's what we are talking about. Just like this shouldn't be a forum about praising other games accomplishments either.

So if a GT forum really is about GT, you should see two basic things:

Praising GT.

Pointing out negative comments about GT.

Those follow the guidelines of being a GT forum... but you will notice only one game gets negative mention here, it's GT... that's not becuase it's a hate on GT forum... that's because the only thing that should be criticized here is the subject of the forum.

Examples:

GT car models are superb! <- This is about GT
Look at these other car models from other games and see how much better GT models are. <- This is still about GT, just using something else as a reference point.

GT track textures are poor. <- This is about GT
Look at these other track textures from othe games and see how much poorer GT textures are. <- While negative, it's still about GT.

Look at this video of XXXX game and how crappy it looks! <- This is not about GT, this is about how bad some other game is.
 
Devedander, you took the words (although much better expressed) straight out of my mouth. I agree with everything you have said in that post. +rep
 
The direction of the shadow at suzuka, Really ???? Wow this is almost worst than the thread about trees.:lol: We really need GT5 before we run out of interesting topics.
 
Watch out guys, sooner or later we're gonna have a thread about the direction of the wind at Suzuka.:crazy:

Well, call me a stickler but wouldn't that be more important than the topic of this thread? I mean, you're delving into aerodynamics now. :P
 
Should we drive the lawn mower to mow the grass at Suzuka? Gotta admit, it's gonna be an important factor in the game.
 
I think GT5 is going to miss one really important element in Suzuka, and that is the hot dog guy in the stands. How will the virtual audience stay fed when they watch us race!?:scared:
 
Will they virtually die and then need to stop the race because the virtual "bambalance", then give the whole virtual crowd virtual donuts just like Jimmy Fallon did?
 
Peeps who think this is no big deal think like Forza devs, and that's why they will always be two steps behind PD

OK, can you highlight in detail why Forza Devs have got it all wrong, and PD devs have got it so right?

I think both have valid shadows, depending on time of day/year..

But, I'm not expert, but would love to know the level of detail PD had to go to to get these 2 steps better details then any other game?

:)
 
See and THIS is where I think the fact that this is a GT forum should come into play...

It makes sense to say positive things about GT here (it's a GT forum) and if referencing comparisons from other games... well that can be solid backup for an argument.

It makes sense to say negative thigns about GT here (it's a GT forum) and if referencing comparisons from other games... well that can be solid backup for an argument.

It DOESN'T make sense to go dissing other games here... then you are talking about other games, you aren't using them for reference anymroe, you are judging them and discussing them... positive or negative that should be saved for whatever forum bears the name of that game.

So bearing that in mind, the fact only one game can recieve criticism makes sense as long as that game is GT as that's what we are talking about. Just like this shouldn't be a forum about praising other games accomplishments either.

So if a GT forum really is about GT, you should see two basic things:

Praising GT.

Pointing out negative comments about GT.

Those follow the guidelines of being a GT forum... but you will notice only one game gets negative mention here, it's GT... that's not becuase it's a hate on GT forum... that's because the only thing that should be criticized here is the subject of the forum.

Examples:

GT car models are superb! <- This is about GT
Look at these other car models from other games and see how much better GT models are. <- This is still about GT, just using something else as a reference point.

GT track textures are poor. <- This is about GT
Look at these other track textures from othe games and see how much poorer GT textures are. <- While negative, it's still about GT.

Look at this video of XXXX game and how crappy it looks! <- This is not about GT, this is about how bad some other game is.
While I very much agree with the idea, I think it is not applicable. Since this forum is open to everyone, it is impossible to introduce the necessary discipline to pull the above thought through.
 
While I very much agree with the idea, I think it is not applicable. Since this forum is open to everyone, it is impossible to introduce the necessary discipline to pull the above thought through.

Well the idea though... it was in large part to explain why you see so much negative about GT and not about other games though... it's not necessarily becuase someone is seeing it skewed, it may just be that GT is the game most talked about here so it makes sense it would be the game with the most negative comments.
 
Seriously, how starved of information must we be to start this type of comparison..

Well, for the moment at least, we are awfully starved of information regarding GT5... people are starting to get edgy :scared: and their thoughts are all starting to go fuzzy as their brains delapidate :drool: !!! :lol:

Seen as we have nothing new to talk about, at the moment, people are just looking into the most minute of things, to form a topic of conversation that assures them that GT5 will not only be good, but better than the rest! :lol:
 
This thread is the biggest joke.


Obviously not enjoying racing if you are looking that closely at the shadows. Don't you understand that shadows move with the sun anyways?
 
Well the idea though... it was in large part to explain why you see so much negative about GT and not about other games though... it's not necessarily becuase someone is seeing it skewed, it may just be that GT is the game most talked about here so it makes sense it would be the game with the most negative comments.
Agreed! Also, it is kind of natural, if sad at the same time, that people tend to raise their voice when they want to complain, as opposed to when they don't if they are happy with the product.
 
I think both have valid shadows, depending on time of day/year..

But, I'm not expert, but would love to know the level of detail PD had to go to to get these 2 steps better details then any other game? :)
You need to read my post.
 
trackdetails.jpg

Silly thread imo, and I'm going off topic with it - The two models doesn't look to have the same shape of the same car. The car on the left looks strange.

Isn't that more important than shadow directions :P
 
Back