Same..
It makes perfect sense that the improved/added features, along with bug fixes would be free. However..., when it comes to the DLC.., I'm not too sure as to whether it'll be paid or not.
The reason I'm on the fence is because 11 cars are NASCAR. I'm curious as to why they focused so much on NASCAR. Did PD's research show that NASCAR is being used in the game more than they had anticipated? I would only speculate that it is being used more for them to add 11 new cars specific to that style of racing.
I think people would be willing to pay as well. Especially considering how long users have been pushing the issue of DLC.
If its paid, the DLC will have to have trading limits to prevent duping right, so the cars will have to be >1million.
If it's free, this doesn't become an issue.
If paid means you get some real quality, new tracks being the most prominent in my mind, then I'm all for paid. Nothing to me matters more than new tracks, I have plenty of cars I've never driven or raced although of course I wouldn't refuse new cars. Give me 10 new, world class tracks, good racing tracks not novelty tracks, even tracks from previous games I don't care, and I'd be happy to fork over $20 to Kaz any time.
If it's what they say, Actually 3 DLC (racecars,tracks, and suits/helmets),
then what happens in online lobbies when some have the track pack and some dont?
I'd rather pay for it.
If it's what they say, Actually 3 DLC (racecars,tracks, and suits/helmets),
then what happens in online lobbies when some have the track pack and some dont?